Social Turns out Imane Khelif Really Was a Man

Dude is a male… he has a rare genetic disorder that messed up his penis.



The key word here is disorder, ie, something went wrong.



He has male chromosomes and can’t have children because he doesn’t have the female parts for it



Doesn’t give him the right to dominate and beat up women much weaker than him



Sucks for him I guess. I can’t enter women’s boxing matches either if I cut off my penis





I answer only because she's not a dude, it's disrespectful to call her that. She's a female who may have a disorder.

First of all I'm 110% opposed to trans people competing against biological women. It need to be totally banned. And I don't even say that Khelif should compete or that it doesn't need to be investigated. Maybe she has a disorder and it becomes unfair both for her opponents and for her. Maybe she shouldn't compete because she has a DSD. But no one knows factually yet.

Second "having an SRY gene" doesn't mean anything because all females have one but it's normally inhibited in XX individuals. It can also be inactive, mutated, partially expressed, or overridden by other biological mechanisms.

But I read French and I wanted to get to the bottom of it and know if that clickbait tweet conclusion are true. Thus I took the time to click on the link given in the alarmist tweet. The link quotes exactly two sentences :

"INTERVIEWER: So that we understand correctly, you have a female phenotype but have the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity.

KHELF: Yes, and it’s natural."

Link: https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/imane-khelif-finally-admits-the-truthand

That's not much. Especially given it's natural for all females to have SRY inhibited gene.

So it's said it's taken from the journal L'Équipe - the one who gives the Ballon d'Or - si I again clicked on the link and read the interview in french. The quote is way longer when you don't conveniently cut it, here it is :

"Pour qu'on comprenne bien, vous avez un phénotype féminin mais possédez le gène SRY, indicateur de masculinité.
Oui, et c'est naturel. J'ai des hormones féminines. Et les gens ne le savent pas, mais j'ai déjà baissé mon taux de testostérone pour des compétitions. Je suis entourée de médecins, un professeur me suit, et j'ai pris des traitements hormonaux pour faire baisser mon taux de testostérone. Pour le tournoi de qualification aux Jeux de Paris, qui se déroulait à Dakar, j'ai baissé mon taux de testostérone à zéro (le taux moyen se situe entre 0,3 et 3 nanomoles par litre de sang chez la femme). Et j'ai gagné la médaille d'or là-bas."

Translation is :
"So that we understand clearly, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity.
Yes, and that is natural. I have female hormones. And people don’t know this, but I have already lowered my testosterone levels for competitions. I am surrounded by doctors, a professor follows my case, and I have taken hormonal treatments to reduce my testosterone levels. For the qualification tournament for the Paris Games, which took place in Dakar, I lowered my testosterone level to zero (the average level in women is between 0.3 and 3 nanomoles per liter of blood). And I won the gold medal there."

Source: https://archive.ph/PXW4z

So here is what we factually know about Imane Khelif’s case:

- She has a female phenotype
- She states she has female hormone levels
- She says she possesses the SRY gene
- She medically lowered her testosterone, even to 0 nmol/L for competition
- She is medically supervised

This information is compatible with some DSD conditions, but it does not prove which condition she may or may not have or even that she has one at all. Without an official karyotype or published medical diagnosis, no firm conclusion can be drawn.

Conclusion nonetheless: should Imane khelif ne allowed to compete ?

Yes if she meets the sport’s eligibility criteria.
No if she demonstrably retains an unfair, male-typical performance advantage that the rules are designed to prevent.

Everything hinges on measurable competitive advantage, not labels.

The principled framework of how this should be decided in odern sport does not classify athletes by: chromosomes genes (including SRY).

It classifies them by performance-relevant variables, mainly: testosterone exposure, hormonal suppression compliance, observable competitive outcomes.

That's the thing. She's not a trans person. She's most probably a female with a DSD - still uncertain but the most probable - and if since she is biologically female since birth she is for now allowed to compete as long as she suppres her testosterone levels.

EDIT: seems like SRY is not automatically present in inhibited form in females, refer to message #332 from @Soggust for the correction.
 
Last edited:
SUMMARY OF MY ANSWER FROM CHATGPT BECAUSE I KNOW IT'S LONG:

I’m answering because Imane Khelif is not a man. She is a biological female who may have a disorder of sex development (DSD).
I am strictly opposed to trans women competing against biological women. That is not what this case is about.

Whether Khelif should compete is still uncertain. If she has a DSD that creates an unfair advantage, then it should absolutely be investigated and regulated. But right now, no one has definitive medical proof.

The viral claim about the SRY gene is misleading.
Having SRY does not automatically mean “male”: all XX females carry SRY in an inhibited form SRY can be inactive, mutated, partially expressed, or overridden. The alarmist tweet selectively quoted two sentences from L’Équipe and cut the rest.

The full interview shows she said:
she has a female phenotype female hormone levels, she medically lowered her testosterone, even to 0 nmol/L, she is medically supervised.

What we factually know:
•female phenotype
•claims female hormones
•testosterone suppression
√medical monitoring

This is compatible with some DSDs, but proves nothing definitive. Without a published diagnosis or karyotype, no firm conclusion can be drawn.

Bottom line:

She should be allowed to compete if she meets eligibility rules.

She should NOT be allowed to compete only if she retains a measurable, male-typical performance advantage.

Sport regulates performance variables (especially testosterone).

And crucially: she is not trans. She is most likely a biological female with a possible DSD, and under current rules, eligibility depends on hormonal compliance
 
The evidence is Khelif failed a gender test on two separate occasions.

And if Khelif does end up having an intersex condition (which there is no evidence of this yet - just pure speculation), simple logic can tell you which one it is since he tested for high testosterone as well. It's the same one most intersex athletes have that compete in the female category - 5α-Reductase 2 deficiency.

People with 5-ard have testes that produce testosterone and micro-penises often mistaken for a huge clit.




Plenty of countries cheat in the Olympics. Alegria in all it's history only has 20 gold medals, 7 of which came in 2024.

Russia and Eastern Europe were cheating for decades. Olympic cheating is nothing new.



So you have zero evidence that Khelif has female reproductive organs? That's what you said.

Yes I'm saying Khelif is a man. Because the lab tests says it's so. Pretty simple.

If after the test it is proven she has an unfair advantage then she should not compete.

If after the test it is proven that she doesn't hold an unfair then she should be allowed to compete.

It's that simple. It shouldn't be based on how she looks because let's be real, for the majority they took a look at her and had an irrevocable judgment.

What irks me is that you guys are turning that as a woke vs conservative debate when all my entire life I was against trans people competing against women and I also was a unicorn on the left for the last 10 years because I don't believe in gender fluid ideology and find it cringe and ridiculous.

But now we're going after DSD people with pitchforks when they didn't chose anything to begin with ?

It seems like being cautious and waiting due process and differentiating clearly between a WOMAN who has a DSD and someone who has transitioned is seen as being picky.

It's not a conservative Vs woke debate. It's a debate that needs details and precision, not just sentiment. That the thing that makes me uncomfortable with all that witch hunt.

One thing I agree with : Khelif should take all the necessary tests so we put that debate to rest.

One other thing I firmly believe : you guys won't put it to rest if the test results are not what you want.
 
If after the test it is proven she has an unfair advantage then she should not compete.

If after the test it is proven that she doesn't hold an unfair then she should be allowed to compete.

It's that simple. It shouldn't be based on how she looks because let's be real, for the majority they took a look at her and had an irrevocable judgment.

What irks me is that you guys are turning that as a woke vs conservative debate when all my entire life I was against trans people competing against women and I also was a unicorn on the left for the last 10 years because I don't believe in gender fluid ideology and find it cringe and ridiculous.

But now we're going after DSD people with pitchforks when they didn't chose anything to begin with ?

It seems like being cautious and waiting due process and differentiating clearly between a WOMAN who has a DSD and someone who has transitioned is seen as being picky.

It's not a conservative Vs woke debate. It's a debate that needs details and precision, not just sentiment. That the thing that makes me uncomfortable with all that witch hunt.

One thing I agree with : Khelif should take all the necessary tests so we put that debate to rest.

One other thing I firmly believe : you guys won't put it to rest if the test results are not what you want.
Holy ChatGPT , XY makes them a biological man category even with DSD and also not 100% woman. The problem was the defending that she was a woman and should be allowed to compete. They have an unfair advantage because due to their natural production of elevated testosterone (and potentially other androgens) driven by male biology
 
Holy ChatGPT , XY makes them a biological man category even with DSD and also not 100% woman. The problem was the defending that she was a woman and should be allowed to compete. They have an unfair advantage because due to their natural production of elevated testosterone (and potentially other androgens) driven by male biology
Simpletons always wish that the world was as simple as they are.
 
I answer only because she's not a dude, it's disrespectful to call her that. She's a female who may have a disorder.

First of all I'm 110% opposed to trans people competing against biological women. It need to be totally banned. And I don't even say that Khelif should compete or that it doesn't need to be investigated. Maybe she has a disorder and it becomes unfair both for her opponents and for her. Maybe she shouldn't compete because she has a DSD. But no one knows factually yet.

Fair take imo

Second "having an SRY gene" doesn't mean anything because all females have one but it's normally inhibited in XX individuals. It can also be inactive, mutated, partially expressed, or overridden by other biological mechanisms.

I don't think this is true. It is true that XX individuals CAN have an SRY gene (which could also be inactive, mutated, etc.), but I don't think all or even most have the gene.

Sources:
The statement that all XX females carry the SRY gene in an inhibited form is factually incorrect; most females with XX chromosomes do not possess the SRY gene. While the presence of a functional SRY gene is typically the primary trigger for male development, it does not automatically guarantee a male phenotype, as the gene can be inactive, mutated, or overridden by other factors, potentially resulting in female development in individuals with SRY (e.g., Swyer Syndrome).
This is not accurate. Here's a clear fact-check based on established genetics:


  • Typical XX females do not have the SRY gene at all.The SRY (Sex-determining Region Y) gene is normally located exclusively on the Y chromosome. Standard 46,XX females (the typical female karyotype) lack a Y chromosome and therefore do not possess the SRY gene. Reliable sources like MedlinePlus Genetics confirm: "The SRY gene is found on the Y chromosome," and typical females have two X chromosomes (46,XX) with no SRY present.
  • The claim that "all females have one" is false.There are extremely rare exceptions where SRY can be present in an XX individual (e.g., via translocation from the Y chromosome to an X during sperm formation in the father). In most such cases, this leads to male development (46,XX testicular difference of sex development, or XX male syndrome), not female. However, there are very rare documented cases of SRY-positive 46,XX individuals developing as typical or apparently typical females, often due to mechanisms like preferential X-inactivation (silencing the translocated chromosome), mutations, or other overrides that prevent SRY function. These are exceptional, not the norm, and do not mean "all females" have SRY.
  • SRY is not "normally inhibited" in XX individuals.Since it's absent in typical XX females, there's nothing to inhibit. In XY males, SRY is expressed briefly in early embryonic gonadal cells to trigger testis development by upregulating genes like SOX9. In the absence of SRY (as in typical XX), the default pathway leads to ovarian development. No routine "inhibition" of SRY occurs in females because the gene isn't there to begin with.
  • The rest of the claim has partial truth but is misleading in context.Yes, SRY can be inactive, mutated (e.g., in some Swyer syndrome cases where XY individuals develop as females due to non-functional SRY), partially expressed, or overridden by other mechanisms (e.g., downstream gene disruptions, translocations with silencing). These are known causes of differences of sex development (DSDs). But this doesn't support the idea that "having an SRY gene doesn't mean anything" or that all females normally have it suppressed.

Overall verdict: The statement is incorrect and overgeneralizes rare exceptions to imply something universal about females and SRY. In typical biology, the presence of a functional SRY gene (usually on the Y chromosome) is a key trigger for male development, while its absence leads to female development. The idea that "all females have one but it's inhibited" is not supported by scientific consensus.
 
Fair take imo



I don't think this is true. It is true that XX individuals CAN have an SRY gene (which could also be inactive, mutated, etc.), but I don't think all or even most have the gene.

Sources:
The statement that all XX females carry the SRY gene in an inhibited form is factually incorrect; most females with XX chromosomes do not possess the SRY gene. While the presence of a functional SRY gene is typically the primary trigger for male development, it does not automatically guarantee a male phenotype, as the gene can be inactive, mutated, or overridden by other factors, potentially resulting in female development in individuals with SRY (e.g., Swyer Syndrome).
This is not accurate. Here's a clear fact-check based on established genetics:


  • Typical XX females do not have the SRY gene at all.The SRY (Sex-determining Region Y) gene is normally located exclusively on the Y chromosome. Standard 46,XX females (the typical female karyotype) lack a Y chromosome and therefore do not possess the SRY gene. Reliable sources like MedlinePlus Genetics confirm: "The SRY gene is found on the Y chromosome," and typical females have two X chromosomes (46,XX) with no SRY present.
  • The claim that "all females have one" is false.There are extremely rare exceptions where SRY can be present in an XX individual (e.g., via translocation from the Y chromosome to an X during sperm formation in the father). In most such cases, this leads to male development (46,XX testicular difference of sex development, or XX male syndrome), not female. However, there are very rare documented cases of SRY-positive 46,XX individuals developing as typical or apparently typical females, often due to mechanisms like preferential X-inactivation (silencing the translocated chromosome), mutations, or other overrides that prevent SRY function. These are exceptional, not the norm, and do not mean "all females" have SRY.
  • SRY is not "normally inhibited" in XX individuals.Since it's absent in typical XX females, there's nothing to inhibit. In XY males, SRY is expressed briefly in early embryonic gonadal cells to trigger testis development by upregulating genes like SOX9. In the absence of SRY (as in typical XX), the default pathway leads to ovarian development. No routine "inhibition" of SRY occurs in females because the gene isn't there to begin with.
  • The rest of the claim has partial truth but is misleading in context.Yes, SRY can be inactive, mutated (e.g., in some Swyer syndrome cases where XY individuals develop as females due to non-functional SRY), partially expressed, or overridden by other mechanisms (e.g., downstream gene disruptions, translocations with silencing). These are known causes of differences of sex development (DSDs). But this doesn't support the idea that "having an SRY gene doesn't mean anything" or that all females normally have it suppressed.

Overall verdict: The statement is incorrect and overgeneralizes rare exceptions to imply something universal about females and SRY. In typical biology, the presence of a functional SRY gene (usually on the Y chromosome) is a key trigger for male development, while its absence leads to female development. The idea that "all females have one but it's inhibited" is not supported by scientific consensus.

I see seems like I read wrong information. It was based on Wikipedia and ChatGPT but fair enough I'll correct the message above. Thanks for the scrutiny.
 
Holy ChatGPT , XY makes them a biological man category even with DSD and also not 100% woman. The problem was the defending that she was a woman and should be allowed to compete. They have an unfair advantage because due to their natural production of elevated testosterone (and potentially other androgens) driven by male biology

She doesn't have XY tho. That's the thing. If it was that simple there would be no debate and I would 100% agree with you on the spot.

So there should be no problem calling her a woman until it's proven otherwise.

Also if it was only about testosterone levels then her testosterone levels are at literally zero for some competitions because she's on testosterone suppressant. So if it's about, and I quote you, "production of elevated testosterone" then she suppressed it totally. So what's the problem ?

Hey listen I am all for her being banned if it is proven she has an unfair advantage. I don't have an ideological dog in that fight.

Hell I think the boxing federation and IOC should FORCE her to undertake all the tests that are possible to take so we can put that debate to rest.

Of her biology gives her an unfair advantage then ban her. But if it doesn't then she should be allowed to compete.

The thing is I feel you guys want to make a scapegoat out of her case because of the craziness of the last 10 years gender fluid wokeness - which I also find cringe and ridiculous - when her situation is totally different from all that stuff.
 
She doesn't have XY tho. That's the thing. If it was that simple there would be no debate and I would 100% agree with you on the spot.

So there should be no problem calling her a woman until it's proven otherwise.

Also if it was only about testosterone levels then her testosterone levels are at literally zero for some competitions because she's on testosterone suppressant. So if it's about, and I quote you, "production of elevated testosterone" then she suppressed it totally. So what's the problem ?

Hey listen I am all for her being banned if it is proven she has an unfair advantage. I don't have an ideological dog in that fight.

Hell I think the boxing federation and IOC should FORCE her to undertake all the tests that are possible to take so we can put that debate to rest.

Of her biology gives her an unfair advantage then ban her. But if it doesn't then she should be allowed to compete.

The thing is I feel you guys want to make a scapegoat out of her case because of the craziness of the last 10 years gender fluid wokeness - which I also find cringe and ridiculous - when her situation is totally different from all that stuff.

He does have XY tho

No female parts. Misgendered at birth due to genetic defect that prevented male genetialia development. He's male

A June 2023 medical report found Khelif has a difference in sexual development — it’s formally called ‘alpha-5 reductase type-2 deficiency’ — with XY chromosomes, internal testes and a “micropenis.”

A hormone test showed a “male-type testosterone level of 14.7,” the French story says, “while the female gender does not exceed the maximum level of 3.”

Its why he would refuse to take genetic testing for competitions requiring it.

Women's sports activists react after boxer Imane Khelif makes confession about biological sex​

The Independent Council on Women's Sports released a statement addressing Khelif's admission​

The Independent Council on Women's Sports (ICONS) released a statement addressing Khelif's admission.

"Algerian Olympic women’s gold medalist Imane Khelif has now confirmed he is male. With men no longer eligible for Olympic women’s boxing under World Boxing rules, Khelif reportedly plans to box professionally in Europe, though he inexplicably says he will still undergo sex screening for the LA 2028 Games in hopes of competing," the statement said.



IOC pressured to rescind boxer’s women’s gold medal after male chromosome disclosure​

Algerian boxer Imane Khelif stunned the sports world by admitting last week to having the SRY [Sex-determining Region Y] gene needed for male development, even as the athlete made the case for reentering the women’s ring at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.


This was from last year. World Boxing announced in May it would start requiring genetic testing in order to compete.

Imane Khelif fighting World Boxing's genetic sex testing rule​

LAUSANNE, Switzerland -- Olympic champion Imane Khelif has appealed a World Boxing decision barring her from upcoming events unless she undergoes genetic sex testing.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport said Monday that the Algerian boxer filed the appeal last month.

Khelif was bidding to compete in the world boxing championships, which start Thursday, but CAS said it dismissed a request to suspend the World Boxing decision until the case was heard.



Khelif's trainer even admitted he was too strong to train with females. He was always hurting them. He went through puberty will all the advantages of having male chromozones, including the muscular development. And that will never change despite going on blockers recently.

It's extremely dangerous to allow Khelif to compete against women. Someone will eventually be seriously injured. The IOC allowed Khelif to compete because they don't do any testing for women boxers, even testosterone. All you hadto do is "Identify" as female. That changed in 2025.

Imane Khelif's trainer admits 'problem with chromosomes' after boxer took gold: 'This poor young girl was devastated'​


Now Spanish national coach Rafa Lozano has revealed that Khelif was considered too dangerous to pair with women at a boxing retreat in Madrid ahead of the Olympics.

'They were doing a retreat at Blume and we couldn't put her with anyone,' he told Radio Marca.

'We put her with Jennifer Fernandez and she hurt her. Whoever we put her with was injured.'

He said coaches only found a match for her after pairing her up with Jose Quiles, one of Spain's leading male boxers.

'I don't see it as fair,' he said. 'Everyone can think what they want, but that's how I see it.'

But the success of Khelif, and of Taiwan's Gold medalist Lin Yu-Ting, has brought intense pressure on the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to tighten up who can compete in its women's categories.

The organization has not conducted chromosomal tests since 1999, and stopped testing for elevated testosterone levels in 2021 after concluding that they prevented 'fairness, inclusion and non-discrimination on the basis of gender identify and sex variation'.

Mexican boxer Brianda Tamara Cruz said she was lucky to escape with her life after sharing a ring with the Algerian at the Golden Belt Series Finals in Guadalajara in 2022.

'When I fought her, I felt it was very out of my reach, I was hurt a lot by the punches,' she said.

'I think I had never in my 13 years as a boxer felt like this, not even in my sparring with men.
 
He does have XY tho

No female parts. Misgendered at birth due to genetic defect that prevented male genetialia development. He's male

A June 2023 medical report found Khelif has a difference in sexual development — it’s formally called ‘alpha-5 reductase type-2 deficiency’ — with XY chromosomes, internal testes and a “micropenis.”

A hormone test showed a “male-type testosterone level of 14.7,” the French story says, “while the female gender does not exceed the maximum level of 3.”

Its why he would refuse to take genetic testing for competitions requiring it.

Women's sports activists react after boxer Imane Khelif makes confession about biological sex​

The Independent Council on Women's Sports released a statement addressing Khelif's admission​

The Independent Council on Women's Sports (ICONS) released a statement addressing Khelif's admission.

"Algerian Olympic women’s gold medalist Imane Khelif has now confirmed he is male. With men no longer eligible for Olympic women’s boxing under World Boxing rules, Khelif reportedly plans to box professionally in Europe, though he inexplicably says he will still undergo sex screening for the LA 2028 Games in hopes of competing," the statement said.



IOC pressured to rescind boxer’s women’s gold medal after male chromosome disclosure​

Algerian boxer Imane Khelif stunned the sports world by admitting last week to having the SRY [Sex-determining Region Y] gene needed for male development, even as the athlete made the case for reentering the women’s ring at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.


This was from last year. World Boxing announced in May it would start requiring genetic testing in order to compete.

Imane Khelif fighting World Boxing's genetic sex testing rule​

LAUSANNE, Switzerland -- Olympic champion Imane Khelif has appealed a World Boxing decision barring her from upcoming events unless she undergoes genetic sex testing.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport said Monday that the Algerian boxer filed the appeal last month.

Khelif was bidding to compete in the world boxing championships, which start Thursday, but CAS said it dismissed a request to suspend the World Boxing decision until the case was heard.



Khelif's trainer even admitted he was too strong to train with females. He was always hurting them. He went through puberty will all the advantages of having male chromozones, including the muscular development. And that will never change despite going on blockers recently.

It's extremely dangerous to allow Khelif to compete against women. Someone will eventually be seriously injured. The IOC allowed Khelif to compete because they don't do any testing for women boxers, even testosterone. All you hadto do is "Identify" as female. That changed in 2025.

Imane Khelif's trainer admits 'problem with chromosomes' after boxer took gold: 'This poor young girl was devastated'​


Now Spanish national coach Rafa Lozano has revealed that Khelif was considered too dangerous to pair with women at a boxing retreat in Madrid ahead of the Olympics.

'They were doing a retreat at Blume and we couldn't put her with anyone,' he told Radio Marca.

'We put her with Jennifer Fernandez and she hurt her. Whoever we put her with was injured.'

He said coaches only found a match for her after pairing her up with Jose Quiles, one of Spain's leading male boxers.

'I don't see it as fair,' he said. 'Everyone can think what they want, but that's how I see it.'

But the success of Khelif, and of Taiwan's Gold medalist Lin Yu-Ting, has brought intense pressure on the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to tighten up who can compete in its women's categories.

The organization has not conducted chromosomal tests since 1999, and stopped testing for elevated testosterone levels in 2021 after concluding that they prevented 'fairness, inclusion and non-discrimination on the basis of gender identify and sex variation'.

Mexican boxer Brianda Tamara Cruz said she was lucky to escape with her life after sharing a ring with the Algerian at the Golden Belt Series Finals in Guadalajara in 2022.

'When I fought her, I felt it was very out of my reach, I was hurt a lot by the punches,' she said.

'I think I had never in my 13 years as a boxer felt like this, not even in my sparring with men.
You are sharing a bunch of literal propaganda and pretending it's a valid source.
 
If after the test it is proven she has an unfair advantage then she should not compete.

If after the test it is proven that she doesn't hold an unfair then she should be allowed to compete.

It's that simple. It shouldn't be based on how she looks because let's be real, for the majority they took a look at her and had an irrevocable judgment.

Bro - she failed two lab tests that said she has XY AND male testosterone levels. WTF are you on about? This has nothing to do with how Khelif looks. There are plenty of butch-ass, man looking women in the Olympics.

What irks me is that you guys are turning that as a woke vs conservative debate when all my entire life I was against trans people competing against women and I also was a unicorn on the left for the last 10 years because I don't believe in gender fluid ideology and find it cringe and ridiculous.

No you are. We're going by the scientific lab tests. You guys are going by ideology.

But now we're going after DSD people with pitchforks when they didn't chose anything to begin with ?

It seems like being cautious and waiting due process and differentiating clearly between a WOMAN who has a DSD and someone who has transitioned is seen as being picky.

Khelif and the other Taiwanese boxer who got eliminated for the exact same thing did get due process. Failed a lab test, they made them take another just in case which they failed again.

Then they had plenty of chance of appeal to the third party Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Switzerland, but they didn't.

Now the new World Boxing rules say EVERY SINGLE competitor must submit to mandatory sex testing which Khelif is so far refusing to do (unless administered by the IOC - which makes zero sense.)

All of that is the epitome of "due process."

It's not a conservative Vs woke debate. It's a debate that needs details and precision, not just sentiment. That the thing that makes me uncomfortable with all that witch hunt.

One thing I agree with : Khelif should take all the necessary tests so we put that debate to rest.

One other thing I firmly believe : you guys won't put it to rest if the test results are not what you want.

Nah this is bullshit. We're going by administered lab tests. You guys are the ones that made it political and try to muddy the waters.
 
Bro - she failed two lab tests that said she has XY AND male testosterone levels.
According to who?
WTF are you on about? This has nothing to do with how Khelif looks. There are plenty of butch-ass, man looking women in the Olympics.
Yes, and this is the one the clowns decided to scapegoat.
No you are. We're going by the scientific lab tests. You guys are going by ideology.
No, you are going by propaganda and simplistically thinking.
Khelif and the other Taiwanese boxer who got eliminated for the exact same thing did get due process. Failed a lab test, they made them take another just in case which they failed again.
According to who?
Then they had plenty of chance of appeal to the third party Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Switzerland, but they didn't.

Now the new World Boxing rules say EVERY SINGLE competitor must submit to mandatory sex testing which Khelif is so far refusing to do (unless administered by the IOC - which makes zero sense.)

All of that is the epitome of "due process."
And Khelif is willing to undergo IOC testing. Weird.
Nah this is bullshit. We're going by administered lab tests. You guys are the ones that made it political and try to muddy the waters.
No, you're just dumb.
 
Back
Top