Trump's Travel Ban 2.0

[Grok]

According to this WaPo article, there have been 9 deadly terrorist attacks in America since 9/11, but none of the perpetrators were from the banned countries.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ouldnt-have-prevented/?utm_term=.0faa66e6c9f1

 

[Seano]

Compare the damage people from SA and Pakistan have done in the US to the damage done by people from countries on the list.

Thats not the point. Totally different topic. Make a thread about it and I'll share my view on that.

 

[Prutfis]

Thats not the point. Totally different topic. Make a thread about it and I'll share my view on that.

That is the point. SA and Pakistan should have been no 1 & 2 on that list. Had Killary done this Trumpsters would have been going apeshit with "Killary SA stooge".

Trump is doing this to "keep america safe", yet the 2 largest sponsors of terrorism and causes of domestic US deaths from terrorism are not on the list. And that´s not the point??????? Really?

 

[San Toki]

Goes into effect in 10days. Bans the previous nations except for Iraq...
Basically banning all nations fighting AlQaida and ISIS and exempting nations that support/fund and populate ISIS and AlQaida. Pathetic and stupid. The last terrorist attack in the US was a paki from saudi arabia.

Legal residents and visa holders will not be banned.

This thread

 

[Handsomebwonderfull]

From what?

the whole russian issue

 

[nac386]

Initiating a travel ban on countries that would not have prevented any acts of terror in the United States is a lot like creating gun control laws that would not have prevented any of the mass shootings.

But liberals are for the gun control, and against the travel ban. And conservatives are against gun control, but for the travel ban.

The logic is pretty much the same in both. While the laws would not have prevented any deaths, they are an attempt to lower the likelihood of future incidents.

 

[Grok]

54% of our refugees come from Somali, Afghnaistan and Syria. Who tops the list on the travel ban? Those countries. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are not on the list. We get very few refugees from those countries.

Do you people get this now? Or are you just going to keep asking what this has to do with 9/11? Its a ban to better improve the tracking of the masses of people trying to get in here.

What terror attacks in the US were done by people from those countries? Every attack has either been done by a US citizen or from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Pakistan or Kyrgyzstan.

 

[Seano]

Initiating a travel ban on countries that would not have prevented any acts of terror in the United States is a lot like creating gun control laws that would not have prevented any of the mass shootings.

But liberals are for the gun control, and against the travel ban. And conservatives are against gun control, but for the travel ban.

The logic is pretty much the same in both. While the laws would not have prevented any deaths, they are an attempt to lower the likelihood of future incidents.

One could argue that stricter gun control may have impeded those mass shootings, eh?

 

[SpawnOfNyarlathotep]

Goes into effect in 10days. Bans the previous nations except for Iraq...
Basically banning all nations fighting AlQaida and ISIS and exempting nations that support/fund and populate ISIS and AlQaida. Pathetic and stupid. The last terrorist attack in the US was a paki from saudi arabia.

Legal residents and visa holders will not be banned.

I think he should ban all Mohammedans, period.

 

[nac386]

One could argue that stricter gun control may have impeded those mass shootings, eh?

Is that your stance?

 

[Grok]

Is that your stance?

Apparently Seano hates the 2nd Amendment.

 

[Prutfis]

Apparently Seano hates the 2nd Amendment.

Gun control in the US is pretty much impossible at this point. Only the bad guys would be armed.. Hell my cousin in Texas has more than 50 weapons, not 1 registered in his own name, how do you "gun control" that?

 

[Toothless King]

Initiating a travel ban on countries that would not have prevented any acts of terror in the United States is a lot like creating gun control laws that would not have prevented any of the mass shootings.

But liberals are for the gun control, and against the travel ban. And conservatives are against gun control, but for the travel ban.

The logic is pretty much the same in both. While the laws would not have prevented any deaths, they are an attempt to lower the likelihood of future incidents.

agreed with all your points.

BUT gun control is unconstitutional while travel ban isn't

 

[Dramovitch]

Prince Al-Waleed of Saudi Arabia, part owner of FOX NEWS, gets his way again. Trump is such a puppet.

 

[electricfuneral]

Then why did his original order mention 9/11 three times?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pres...-nation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states

 

[Desdinova]

I wish he'd abandon the stupid travel ban. Its costs way too much political currency, for no benefit to him, or national security. Definitely one of Trump's dumbest policies.

Trump is squandering what little political currency he has.

 

[Hit-N-Run]

A completely stupid, ill-though out policy. The only purpose is to feed meat to the loony right-wing base.

Unfortunately, they are too stupid to realize this policy does absolutely nothing to further security.

 

[ripskater]

I'm glad Trump is doing something to slow Islamic immigration. I wish it went farther but at least it's something.

I'd ban all Muslims from crossing into our borders if I was president. Islam has a major jihad problem right now.

 

[ripskater]

It would have kept the Ohio State terrorist out and prevented 9 kids from getting run over by a car and stabbed with a butcher knife.

So you can't say it would've done nothing.

 

[CargoKing]

Sorry to interrupt your liberal circle jerk, but how quickly you forget your own Cuck Schumer helped a guy get past the ban, and he raped a kid three days later.


http://pamelageller.com/2017/03/schumers-muslim-rapist.html/

Awesome reflexive partisan bullshit. Did you even read the responses you framed as a "liberal circle jerk" before realizing the main issue is the ban not reaching far enough?

I'm glad Trump is doing something to slow Islamic immigration. I wish it went farther but at least it's something.

I'd ban all Muslims from crossing into our borders if I was president. Islam has a major jihad problem right now.

It's funny hearing this from a guy who believes the earth is flat and kids should be nuked, a guy who'd rape his dog everyday if his good book told him to.

You're as dangerous as ISIS, just weaker and lazier.