- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 74,910
- Reaction score
- 57,753
*sigh*No I agree with you that both sides think they are acting in common sense and me and you are both extremely partisan so we probably aren't the best judges of who is right. I would say right now most (albeit not an overwhelming majority) would agree with you whereas in 2021 most would have agreed with me.
I don't know what you mean about women's rights? The ones that republicans are campaigning to take away, like our right to bodily autonomy? Or? Sorry, just bugs me when conservatives frame the trans debate as being about being pro women or pro women sports when they go out of their way to hate both of those things. But I also don't know genuinely what you mean about the rights women have? I think trans people deserve the same rights as anyone else. If you are asking specifically about sports I believe there are over 500k women athletes in the NCAA and 10 or fewer are trans. Do I want to make legislation to eradicate them? No, I don't. For lower levels I think trans girls should be allowed to play with the gender they identity with.
Do I forsee a scenario where trans women competing in cisgendered women sports becomes a problem? Not really but if it did I would be happy to handle it now, but I'm going to start from a place of kindness and inclusion and until it becomes a problem I'll side with that. I'll side with reducing the rates of suicide for trans kids by not alienating them and making them feel like freaks. Now I want to say I recognize on this your opinion is the majority, not mine. It is very effective politics for the right to fear monger about trans people. America is generally not pro trans but I also don't think they would agree with some of the abject cruelty that the right spews at them, but maybe I am naive.
You're fighting an impossible fight.
No, because you actually can make an argument against those cases. You can't make one for the Earth being flat. Much like you can't for a man becoming a woman. Those aren't "controversial" issues, like climate change and vaccine dependency are.As for flat earth I think maybe a better analogy is like denying climate change and vax science.
It's not, but it is a niche subject that skews to the right(-wing nutjobs). If they ever have people in congress arguing for it, that will be their "men can become women" moment, and I will throw up my hands, become a some weird hermit who lives in a hollowed out tree in the forest, and lose all faith in humanity over it.Don't think flat earth is that popular but maybe I'm wrong. I hope I didn't say anything in this answer that was inflammatory, I'm really not trying to be hostile or fight.