• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Elections Trump's approval rating

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 592570
  • Start date Start date
Everything is biased if it doesn't confirm your narrow and isolated view of the world as a sweaty Canadian that wants to get annexed by my country. Got it..

Literally owned by Disney lmao

And now out of business
 
Pretty strong numbers in his first Fox poll.

CSmPjqE.png
 
Bad news war room goth kids and drama nerds, even CNN can't spin this. If you aren't on the Trump train, get on soon or get left behind! Choo choo, bitches! The Chads are back in town.



Here's the poll results they're citing in the video.


Screenshot-20250211-092633-Brave.jpg


Screenshot-20250211-092637-Brave.jpg


trump-job-rating.jpg


Trump's approval rating is ~20 points higher than Biden's was at the end of his term! Insane!

Screenshot-20250211-092332-Brave.jpg

Hey weirdo, time for an update
<lol>
 
It will go up, it will go down. It will still be higher than Democrat approval, which is what the lefties really need to focus on. You'll need Trump to hit sub 30's to start getting excited. That's how shit the Dems are right now, and I can't imagine that mocking a child cancer survivor is helping.

Dems are around 20%.

GoMWFqQWkAAQJHk


😵
 
It will go up, it will go down. It will still be higher than Democrat approval, which is what the lefties really need to focus on. You'll need Trump to hit sub 30's to start getting excited. That's how shit the Dems are right now, and I can't imagine that mocking a child cancer survivor is helping.

It blows my mind. It should be a slam dunk victory, but they can't help themselves.
 
Dems are around 20%.

GoMWFqQWkAAQJHk


😵
I’m honestly not sure what the public thinks congressional Dems should do. Thanks to our very wise and learned electorate, we don’t have the numbers to pass anything legislatively. If there was something in which we could get enough Republican backing, I am sure Dems would do it—although of course Trump would just veto it and that would be that.

Dems should be doing plenty of messaging, public speaking, town halls, shit like that to raise awareness. I am not all that sure what the public is mad about.
 
I honestly don't get it. They're living in an alternate universe. I knew they were selling an alternate universe, but when it fails they...double down? I didn't think the government side of these retards were all in. If they stay the course, they might actually kill the party. They might actually believe that they're at a point where a violent revolution is necessary. It would go about as well as expected.

These people watch too many movies.
Hahahahahaha

chunky-milk.gif
 
I’m honestly not sure what the public thinks congressional Dems should do. Thanks to our very wise and learned electorate, we don’t have the numbers to pass anything legislatively. If there was something in which we could get enough Republican backing, I am sure Dems would do it—although of course Trump would just veto it and that would be that.

Dems should be doing plenty of messaging, public speaking, town halls, shit like that to raise awareness. I am not all that sure what the public is mad about.
If I’m dem leader, you distance yourself from progressive culture ideology as quickly as possible. Focus on taxing the rich, increase tax credits on the middle class and jump on closing the border.

Trump is nuts, but the whole 80/20 position taking is absolutely true.

That’s why he won and why the dems are getting crushed in spite of Trump being horrible.
 
If I’m dem leader, you distance yourself from progressive culture ideology as quickly as possible. Focus on taxing the rich, increase tax credits on the middle class and jump on closing the border.

Trump is nuts, but the whole 80/20 position taking is absolutely true.

That’s why he won and why the dems are getting crushed in spite of Trump being horrible.

...stop attempting to molest the 2A, start believing in the territorial integrity of the nation-state they claim to represent, and offer something better than the status quo on public lands. In any case, it's utterly essential that they win back the House. I prefer the federal government in gridlock.
 
...stop attempting to molest the 2A, start believing in the territorial integrity of the nation-state they claim to represent, and offer something better than the status quo on public lands. In any case, it's utterly essential that they win back the House. I prefer the federal government in gridlock.
That would get YOU to vote for them. Me too, but probably not win the electorate.
 


I can't believe this 17 years ago! I feel old.
 
If I’m dem leader, you distance yourself from progressive culture ideology as quickly as possible. Focus on taxing the rich, increase tax credits on the middle class and jump on closing the border.

Trump is nuts, but the whole 80/20 position taking is absolutely true.

That’s why he won and why the dems are getting crushed in spite of Trump being horrible.
Yeah, that’s the big narrative, but to me it seemed like those things—I’m thinking of things like trans issues or DEI—was a huge part of right wing messaging about us, but not really a big part of what we ran on. Kamala ran a lot on the economy (tax plan, inflation, housing), we ran on protecting a woman’s right to choose, climate, and of course we tried to warn people about how dangerous Trump is.

I think there are things like trans athletes in school sports that we should leave alone, but otherwise I definitely don’t want us to back away from protecting minority rights or women’s rights. I do appreciate your answer and perspective though.

...stop attempting to molest the 2A, start believing in the territorial integrity of the nation-state they claim to represent, and offer something better than the status quo on public lands. In any case, it's utterly essential that they win back the House. I prefer the federal government in gridlock.
Oh sorry bud, that question was for actual voters.
<Selugi>

But I agree with the last thing you said. Every Trump supporter right now who also considers themselves a patriot in any sense should listen to what Scalia says here and take it to heart.

 
Yeah, that’s the big narrative, but to me it seemed like those things—I’m thinking of things like trans issues or DEI—was a huge part of right wing messaging about us, but not really a big part of what we ran on. Kamala ran a lot on the economy (tax plan, inflation, housing), we ran on protecting a woman’s right to choose, climate, and of course we tried to warn people about how dangerous Trump is.

I think there are things like trans athletes in school sports that we should leave alone, but otherwise I definitely don’t want us to back away from protecting minority rights or women’s rights. I do appreciate your answer and perspective though.


Oh sorry bud, that question was for actual voters.
<Selugi>

But I agree with the last thing you said. Every Trump supporter right now who also considers themselves a patriot in any sense should listen to what Scalia says here and take it to heart.


I think Kamala tried to walk the line. Wasn’t running on it, but didn’t distance herself from it. Newsome is trying to distance himself right now in prep for 2028.
 
I think Kamala tried to walk the line. Wasn’t running on it, but didn’t distance herself from it. Newsome is trying to distance himself right now in prep for 2028.
I can agree with that, although to an extent that’s just politics. Some of the responses that you and @Deorum gave would be things that would pull you in to vote, but lose me. It’s hard to find a good line where you can be in the middle.

I totally agree that Kamala didn’t distance herself from mistakes Biden made, and that’s a killer. Biden to me was one of the most successful one term presidents we’ve had, certainly in modern times, but he did make some major mistakes and she really fumbled in not being clear about that.
 
It’s kind of wild to see this, but I respect you and your opinion.
Well, I won’t harp on too much about it. I think history will look at him that way. Inflation Reduction Act, CHIPs and Science Act, Investment and Jobs Act, we had a level of corporate and government investment in this country relative to GDP that we hadn’t seen in this country since the early 1980s. Maybe you think he was dementia-ridden and other people ran the show—but whomever did, got quite a bit done.
 
Back
Top