- Joined
- Apr 18, 2015
- Messages
- 7,974
- Reaction score
- 0
That's just one of the reasons why his Presidency would be a far riskier thing than the Clinternative. All signs indicate he'd make the huge mistake you describe.
And his unfitness for office shows in the number of his own Party that rebuke him and wouldn't torpedo their political careers by getting aboard the Trump train to nowhere. The only people who'd be willing to take that risk are people who can't lose their base anyways.
Clinton has her faults but being unwilling to listen to wise counsel isn't one of them.
It's about intention.
I don't believe it is Hilarys intention to put the needs of the American people above her corporate globalist cronies.
There's a lifetime career that says otherwise to look at as proof.
She let Americans die in Benghazi in order to avoid offending their govt by sending our guys in right away and to avoid having to admit the real reason for the attack was her failure there.
She lied knowingly when asked if she sent any classified materials over her email in order to protect her image.
We have proof of this from the FBI directors own mouth.
She does not have honest intentions and never did.
I believe it is Trump's intention to actually put the needs of American citizens over those of the globalists.
He speaks out against them like no other politician has because he's not owned by them.
I mean jeez, the Koch Bros are considering voting for Hilary and hate Trump. Let that sink in.
Much of His own party doesn't like him for the same reason. He won't fall in line with the Corp masters. It's his entire platform from day 1.