Trump: We must "start thinking about" racial profiling

Byron Carter said:
Everyone profiles, all the time.

Pretending we don't is merely a SJW/Liberal fantasy.
Click to expand...

SJWs and leftists are the most guilty of racial profiling. They are constantly profiling for privilege based on skin color.
 
I think his supporters have been thinking about it for a long time now.
 
I despise Trump and think he is easily the worst candidate of our lifetimes (and maybe history) and if he wins will leave lasting damage to our country and place in the world.

But I do agree with this one point. There is only one religion that is producing terrorists that have basically declared war on anyone not Muslim and it's very rational to profile them to an extent. The big question, and one where I probably have very different views than Trump, is what you do with that profiling.
 
Bad approach, Donald.

He should've just pointed out that racial profiling already exists under the Liberal regime, and he isn't suggesting anything new. Just being more open about it.
 
Last Samurai said:
he's right, profiling is not the worst thing to do


it's not like he's saying we should round them up and put them in concentration camps... yet
Click to expand...
You haven't been paying attention to what trump says then
 
There are only 1 to 3 groups that are violent and need to be profiled.
Will putting under cover In a Jewish temple help prevent terror attacks.

Will going after Buddhist help prevent terror attack.

How about people who attend mosque, travel back and forth between terror counties.
It's common sense
 
Not once did he ever mention racial profiling. This is pure agitprop bullshit. The media creates a headline misconstruing what a person says, and gullible guppies who want to believe the lie gobble it up.

If you think mosques should face more scrutiny from our intelligence communities than churches, synagogues, or temples, then you are in favor of profiling.
 
sodapopinski said:
Not once did he ever mention racial profiling. This is pure agitprop bullshit.

If you think mosques should face more scrutiny from our intelligence communities than churches, synagogues, or temples, then you are in favor of profiling.
Click to expand...
And isn't that the reasonable approach? It's so obvious that Jews and Catholics aren't doing the kinds of things that Muslims are in the world. Their ideology is producing maniacs that are want to kill (and are very willing to die doing it).
 
kpt018 said:
And isn't that the reasonable approach? It's so obvious that Jews and Catholics aren't doing the kinds of things that Muslims are in the world. Their ideology is producing maniacs that are want to kill (and are very willing to die doing it).
Click to expand...
This headline is pure fear mongering.

We either profile the places where radicalization happens, or we waste a ton of resources infiltrating Amish Sunday School services and other places of worship in a bizarre attempt to not be profiling while we try to stop "radicalization" and "extremism," which of course would make us way more vulnerable.

Stupid headline is stupid.
 
sodapopinski said:
This headline is pure fear mongering.

We either profile the places where radicalization happens, or we waste a ton of resources infiltrating Amish Sunday School services and other places of worship in a bizarre attempt to not be profiling while we try to stop "radicalization" and "extremism," which of course would make us way more vulnerable.

Stupid headline is stupid.
Click to expand...
Yup. And as you said we already do profile. I'm willing to guess we don't have the same resources committed to say the Nordic countries as we do in the Middle East ;).
 
Trump should say "We should start using statistical information to spend law enforcement effort on"
Statistical information = truth and by definition not racist.
 
Just wait a minute, he'll backtrack and claim he's open minded enough to change his opinion-
Depending on which group he's speaking to next.

They used to call it flip flopping, and it used to be a bad thing.
 
TheComebackKid said:
I would rather not profile American citizens be they muslim or anything else. Profiling and scrutenizing the non-American citizens we let in this country? Have at it.
Click to expand...
it still doesnt fix the problem... Pulse shooter was born and raised in America. We need to ignore religion cause it is irrelevant. This shooter could have been anyone, white supremacists have no problem walking into black churches and doing the same.
 
TodayMaldonadoDiedRIP said:
it still doesnt fix the problem... Pulse shooter was born and raised in America. We need to ignore religion cause it is irrelevant. This shooter could have been anyone, white supremacists have no problem walking into black churches and doing the same.
Click to expand...

If we had profiled and scrutinized his dad a little before we let him become a us citizen then yes it would have prevented this attack.
 
Of course you should do that, all of course within reason.

But if the KKK starts blowing stuff up and all white guys getting "randomly selected" for searches an airports, I wouldn't have an issue with them searching me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,629
Messages
58,450,909
Members
176,041
Latest member
jaybuff

Share this page

Back
Top