Elections Trump: We have to use military to target radicals and enemy from within

[badascan]

there is no misunderstanding what he said about using the national guard or military on lefties including nancy pelosi. trump forgot to use cleverly crafted double speak in that instance. he just said it out loud and plainly. you know this but as as fellow liar will pretend you don't see it.

trump is a thug and a degradation of everything our country stands for.

you guys are just so degraded yourselves that you cant tell.

Twist and turn, you aren't addressing any of the points I've made and frankly you aren't addressing the points I'm generously assuming you're making. Just projection and nonsense... I don't recognize your handle but I'm sure this isn't the first time an exchange has gone exactly the same way with you... You're a waste of time.

 

[ermac88]

Why chime in with drivel? Was that an example of herd mentality?

Do you, know what, herd mentality is?

Maybe, give that picture a listen again.

 

[terrapin]

Twist and turn, you aren't addressing any of the points I've made and frankly you aren't addressing the points I'm generously assuming you're making. Just projection and nonsense... I don't recognize your handle but I'm sure this isn't the first time an exchange has gone exactly the same way with you... You're a waste of time.

You are projecting 100%. You're basically just completely full of s*** and you have to justify why you would vote for a liar who threatens Americans with military force and you have to obfuscate in order to do that because there is no reasoned intellectually based argument for it.

The reason I didn't address your ridiculous points is because they had nothing to do with what I actually wrote because you're straw Manning and being a liar just like Trump.

My position is that only a fool and imbecile or a villain would vote for a man who threatens American citizens with military force. I am a public speaker and everyone involved in public speaking learns very quickly that we have to measure our language very carefully as it can have a profound effect on the listener. Your ilk will try to deny and pretend that violent speech, hateful speech, divisive speech and chaos inducing speech from Trump has no effect on anyone.

But anyone can see that only a fool or a liar could make those statements. You are the latter.

 

[badascan]

You are projecting 100%. You're basically just completely full of s*** and you have to justify why you would vote for a liar who threatens Americans with military force and you have to obfuscate in order to do that because there is no reasoned intellectually based argument for it.

The reason I didn't address your ridiculous points is because they had nothing to do with what I actually wrote because you're straw Manning and being a liar just like Trump.

My position is that only a fool and imbecile or a villain would vote for a man who threatens American citizens with military force. I am a public speaker and everyone involved in public speaking learns very quickly that we have to measure our language very carefully as it can have a profound effect on the listener. Your ilk will try to deny and pretend that violent speech, hateful speech, divisive speech and chaos inducing speech from Trump has no effect on anyone.

But anyone can see that only a fool or a liar could make those statements. You are the latter.

Ironically you and everyone who's screeching about this interview probably couldn't define "American citizen". These groups certainly would have had some nonsense way to dance around defining it until they felt they could use it as a pitchfork...

 

[Seano]

Do you, know what, heard mentality is?

Maybe, give that picture a listen again.

Unique use of commas. "Heard" mentality is what liberals have a 1/2 hour after the nightly Maddow report.

 

[terrapin]

Ironically you and everyone who's screeching about this interview probably couldn't define "American citizen". These groups certainly would have had some nonsense way to dance around defining it until they felt they could use it as a pitchfork...

This is nonsense and the reason you are posting nonsense is because you have no sane response to defending a former president and future president hopeful from threatening to use the military on his political enemies.

You can't justify the fact that he said it. You can't justify the fact that he is using it as a bullying tactic and you can't justify the fact that he riles up his base with violent rhetoric.

The reason that you can't justify it is because you've picked a losing horse and his actions are unjustifiable, immoral, out of place, unfit for the office of the presidency, and destructive to our country.

You are supporting him anyway, which says a lot about who you are too.

 

[ermac88]

Unique use of commas. "Heard" mentality is what liberals have a 1/2 hour after the nightly Maddow report.

Whatever incoherent gibberish you are rambling about, has nothing to do with-

 

[Bob Gray]

This is nonsense and the reason you are posting nonsense is because you have no sane response to defending a former president and future president hopeful from threatening to use the military on his political enemies.

You can't justify the fact that he said it. You can't justify the fact that he is using it as a bullying tactic and you can't justify the fact that he riles up his base with violent rhetoric.

The reason that you can't justify it is because you've picked a losing horse and his actions are unjustifiable immoral, out of place, unfit for the opposite presidency, and destructive to our country.

You are supporting him anyway, which says a lot about who you are too.

Theres not a lot to defend when the conclusions you make are insane. Christ look at he actually said:

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics, and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by the National Guard or if really necessary by the military."


And you've interpreted those words as "He will attack Nancy Pelosi with the military":

there is no misunderstanding what he said about using the national guard or military on lefties including nancy pelosi.

And "He will use the military on political enemies":

you are posting nonsense is because you have no sane response to defending a former president and future president hopeful from threatening to use the military on his political enemies.

You can't debate nonsense like this. You don't go by what he says. You interpret all this other meaning behind his words that are not what he's stating.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

Theres not a lot to defend when the conclusions you make are insane. Christ look at he actually said:

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics, and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by the National Guard or if really necessary by the military."


And you've interpreted those words as "He will attack Nancy Pelosi with the military":



And "He will use the military on political enemies":



You can't debate nonsense like this. You don't go by what he says. You interpret all this other meaning behind his words that are not what he's stating.

Well he sure seems to like the idea of hauling his political foes before "military tribunals"

Brooklyn’s Sen. Chuck Schumer threatened by Trump with military tribunal and imprisonment

SEN. SCHUMER was threatened by former President Donald Trump in a social media post on his Truth Social website over the weekend.

brooklyneagle.com

 

[terrapin]

Theres not a lot to defend when the conclusions you make are insane. Christ look at he actually said:

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics, and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by the National Guard or if really necessary by the military."


And you've interpreted those words as "He will attack Nancy Pelosi with the military":



And "He will use the military on political enemies":



You can't debate nonsense like this. You don't go by what he says. You interpret all this other meaning behind his words that are not what he's stating.

what a liar.... you are asking people to believe you... a total liar when the context including pelosi is there for all to hear and/or read (but not if they read your dishonest edited version of course) there is no way to mistake his meaning this time... he forgot to use cleverly crafted double speak designed to troll the left and causes division and chaos. there is no good faith way to pretend that he did not include pelosi in that rant.

you are a liar like trump.

I genuinely don't know what to do with these people anymore. they are beyond reason.

 

[terrapin]

Well he sure seems to like the idea of hauling his political foes before "military tribunals"

Brooklyn’s Sen. Chuck Schumer threatened by Trump with military tribunal and imprisonment

SEN. SCHUMER was threatened by former President Donald Trump in a social media post on his Truth Social website over the weekend.

brooklyneagle.com

there is not a good faith way to pretend trump did not include pelosi in that rant about sick leftists. these guys are completely lost in their own world of alternative facts and are so far down a road that they believe their own lies now.

this is a common experience with serial liars.... they start to believe their own lies and they think to themselves "I could be telling the truth and if I was they would not be believing me" and they are sick enough to take offence at their imaginings.

its nearly pathological at this point.

 

[Bob Gray]

what a liar.... you are asking people to believe you... a total liar when the context including pelosi is there for all to hear and/or read (but not if they read your dishonest edited version of course) there is no way to mistake his meaning this time... he forgot to use cleverly crafted double speak designed to troll the left and causes division and chaos. there is no good faith way to pretend that he did not include pelosi in that rant.

you are a liar like trump.

I genuinely don't know what to do with these people anymore. they are beyond reason.

My dishonest edited version? Huh? im literally the only one including his quote. He doesnt say what you're getting your panties in a bunch about. His doesnt mention and is not talking about using the military on Nany Pelosi for gods sake.

Seriously, what do you think he's going to do? Run a military strike operation on Nancy Pelosi's house? You are absolutely mentally broken.

 

[Bob Gray]

Well he sure seems to like the idea of hauling his political foes before "military tribunals"

Brooklyn’s Sen. Chuck Schumer threatened by Trump with military tribunal and imprisonment

SEN. SCHUMER was threatened by former President Donald Trump in a social media post on his Truth Social website over the weekend.

brooklyneagle.com

You posted an article without a quote thats behind a paywall. What's the gotcha you're talking about?

Did he say he was going to haul Schumer in front of a military tribunal?

Let me guess. No he didnt say that, but that's totally what he meant, right?

 

[badascan]

Theres not a lot to defend when the conclusions you make are insane. Christ look at he actually said:

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics, and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by the National Guard or if really necessary by the military."


And you've interpreted those words as "He will attack Nancy Pelosi with the military":



And "He will use the military on political enemies":



You can't debate nonsense like this. You don't go by what he says. You interpret all this other meaning behind his words that are not what he's stating.

As amusing as it can be to try to reach them, sadly it's a waste of time...

 

[terrapin]

im literally the only one including his edited quote dishonestly.

Fixed.

 

[Loiosh]

Theres not a lot to defend when the conclusions you make are insane. Christ look at he actually said:

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics, and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by the National Guard or if really necessary by the military."


And you've interpreted those words as "He will attack Nancy Pelosi with the military":



And "He will use the military on political enemies":



You can't debate nonsense like this. You don't go by what he says. You interpret all this other meaning behind his words that are not what he's stating.

You give Trump far too much credit for innocence by idiocy.

He's far too vague with language that could mean a great deal of terrible things, and remember, he's the guy who said he'd pay for the legal defense of someone beating the hell out of reporters at his rallies. He said cops should be less nice putting perps in cars and references knocking their heads on the way in.

I'm confident you're right that he doesn't mean what people are saying in this thread and even if he did he wouldn't have the power to make that happen, but this isn't the person who should be wielding supreme executive power. His rhetoric is orders of magnitude worse than anything that has ever come from modern Democrats and extremists are far more likely to take his vagueness as express, literal instructions.

After January 6th, whatever leeway you think politicians should have with their words has been erased for MAGA. In any other administration the "bloodbath" comment could be handwaved but not this one, not after they hospitalized one hundred and fifty police officers following his last loss.

 

[Loiosh]

There's an Obama quote I'm trying to find that is an example of Democrats and dangerous ideas, something about to the effect of torture possibly being acceptable if the stakes were high enough and the torturer was willing to accept the consequences.

 

[Andy Capp]

You posted an article without a quote thats behind a paywall. What's the gotcha you're talking about?

Did he say he was going to haul Schumer in front of a military tribunal?

Let me guess. No he didnt say that, but that's totally what he meant, right?

There's no paywall. You just have to click on the X to close the nag screen. Give it a go.

 

[DoctorTaco]

Theres not a lot to defend when the conclusions you make are insane. Christ look at he actually said:

"I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics, and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by the National Guard or if really necessary by the military."


And you've interpreted those words as "He will attack Nancy Pelosi with the military":



And "He will use the military on political enemies":



You can't debate nonsense like this. You don't go by what he says. You interpret all this other meaning behind his words that are not what he's stating.

My dishonest edited version? Huh? im literally the only one including his quote. He doesnt say what you're getting your panties in a bunch about. His doesnt mention and is not talking about using the military on Nany Pelosi for gods sake.

Seriously, what do you think he's going to do? Run a military strike operation on Nancy Pelosi's house? You are absolutely mentally broken.

“
"I spoke to her about guns yesterday. She didn't even know what I was talking about," Trump said of Pelosi. "All she's thinking about is [impeachment]. She's been taken over by the radical left, the whole Democrat Party."

"Nancy Pelosi, as far as I'm concerned, is no longer the speaker of the House," he concluded, suggesting she had ceded her authority over the House to the far left of her party.”

-Donald Trump

 

[Bob Gray]

“
"I spoke to her about guns yesterday. She didn't even know what I was talking about," Trump said of Pelosi. "All she's thinking about is [impeachment]. She's been taken over by the radical left, the whole Democrat Party."

"Nancy Pelosi, as far as I'm concerned, is no longer the speaker of the House," he concluded, suggesting she had ceded her authority over the House to the far left of her party.”

-Donald Trump

Right. Like I said before, you dont take what he says. You connect dots like a conspiracy theorist in front of a corkboard. In this case, you're literally referring to a quote from 2019.

Just say whether or not you think he's going to use the military against Nancy Pelosi.