International Trump: US control of Greenland is absolute nescessity

[Andy Capp]

I don’t want to support Ukraine. We should we actively ending the war in Ukraine. We should be actively securing the Arctic. These opinions are not contradictory.

Funny how you completely ignore Canadian sovereignty in this discussion.

 

[JBJisGOAT14]

lol. Trump angling to squeeze more money from that cash cow known as Denmark, and dumb libs are too dumb to see it. I reckon after Ukraine is liberated, the money we saved will be used to fund social security and balance the budget.

TBH, I can’t believe I didn’t vote for the guy. It’s 100% a win-win for me. Either he proves me wrong and does some good things, ends up being a net positive for the country, maybe saves me some tax money, or he proves me right by being a disaster—again—and I get to watch his supporters shred their integrity and abandon whatever dignity they had left just to avoid admitting they were wrong for 4 more years. I cannot lose.

Either draft dodger does some good and it’s positive for me….or most likely to happen, he drives everything into the ground and I get to spit on these magatards.

 

[Rod1]

The are an adversary who, along with China, are threatening the Artic. We should halt this with our own advancement in the space.

If its an hostile adversary then using Ukraine as a proxy to drain Russian armed forces is not only the cold, logical conclusion, its also the most cost-effective one.

Rather than threaten allies to give up land, the US can send old gear that its bound to be scrapped anyway to the battlefields of Ukraine which will prolong Russian failed invasion of the nation until the nation is not even close to being a threat to the US anymore.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

If its an hostile adversary then using Ukraine as a proxy to drain Russian armed forces is not only the cold, logical conclusion, its also the most cost-effective one.

Rather than threaten allies to give up land, the US can send old gear that its bound to be scrapped anyway to the battlefields of Ukraine which will prolong Russian failed invasion of the nation until the nation is not even close to being a threat to the US anymore.

you know an argument is retarded when you hear it spammed endlessly by people that have never even been closer than thousands of miles from a battlefield. all these fat armchair dork war accounting attempts inevitably fail.

 

[Rational Poster]

If its an hostile adversary then using Ukraine as a proxy to drain Russian armed forces is not only the cold, logical conclusion, its also the most cost-effective one.

Rather than threaten allies to give up land, the US can send old gear that its bound to be scrapped anyway to the battlefields of Ukraine which will prolong Russian failed invasion of the nation until the nation is not even close to being a threat to the US anymore.

Sure is a shame Russia's one of a kind artic vessel they needed to pay the Germans to make just happened to explode and sink in the Mediterranean over the holiday.

 

[Rational Poster]

you know an argument is retarded when you hear it spammed endlessly by people that have never even been closer than thousands of miles from a battlefield. all these fat armchair dork war accounting attempts inevitably fail.

Yeah you're right things are just going great for Russia right now.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Yeah you're right things are just going great for Russia right now.

much better than for the ukrainians sadly.

 

[Rational Poster]

much better than for the ukrainians sadly.

Even in that narrow context that's not a true statement.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Even in that narrow context that's not a true statement.

yes it is.

 

[Rational Poster]

yes it is.

I mean at their current rate it's going to take Russia 500 years and 30 million casualties to capture all of Ukraine.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

I mean at their current rate it's going to take Russia 500 years and 30 million casualties to capture all of Ukraine.

why would they want the whole of ukraine? most of it is useless.

 

[Rational Poster]

why would they want the whole of ukraine? most of it is useless.

Talk about arm chair generals knowing nothing and then you say this? Lmao.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Talk about arm chair generals knowing nothing and then you say this? Lmao.

Know a lot more than you.

 

[Rational Poster]

Know a lot more than you.

No you don't if you could utter the phrase "Most of Ukraine is useless" while Russia is feeding hundreds of thousands into a woodchipper to capture it.

 

[Limbo Pete]

If its an hostile adversary then using Ukraine as a proxy to drain Russian armed forces is not only the cold, logical conclusion, its also the most cost-effective one.

Rather than threaten allies to give up land, the US can send old gear that its bound to be scrapped anyway to the battlefields of Ukraine which will prolong Russian failed invasion of the nation until the nation is not even close to being a threat to the US anymore.

It's some of the silliest panic wrestling I've seen in a while lol
@Islam Imamate got em good lmao

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Trump has deranged these guys into actively denying reality and common sense.

cope

 

[Rod1]

you know an argument is retarded when you hear it spammed endlessly by people that have never even been closer than thousands of miles from a battlefield. all these fat armchair dork war accounting attempts inevitably fail.

"When you kill your enemies, they win" Fox by the Sea

 

[wufabufa]

My boy Dump is going to buy Greenland and build a fantastic wall around it to keep it secure.

He will also make sure Greenland pays for the wall once he finalizes the purchase.

Gotta keep the Wildlings and White Walkers in somehow.

 

[Sweater of AV]

No you don't if you could utter the phrase "Most of Ukraine is useless" while Russia is feeding hundreds of thousands into a woodchipper to capture it.

Just ignore him. The guy is a clueless idiot.

 

[Zazen]

Gotta keep the Wildlings and White Walkers in somehow.

Is that Matt Gaetz in your avatar? Looks like him