Crime Trump-Ukraine Megathread v4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Allegedly Mittens thinks he can be the one to pull moderate republicans in the Senate lol

Whoever leads this is going to come out on the other side a serious candidate to lead the party back to sanity and help recover it's odds at the polls.
 
LOL, sure it is, sweetie. Sure it is...

Impeachment is polling higher for Trump than it was polling for Clinton or even Nixon... two Presidents that actually got impeached.

He's getting impeached. Now Mitch and his gang of crooks acting on it is another thing entirely.
 
Republican support for impeachment is up to 28%, general support is over 58%.

Trump will be impeached for certain but he might also be removed from office around the Holiday season at this rate.

Who will be the Scott, Goldwater and Rhodes of the Republican Senate?

When you do not understand the difference between an impeachment inquiry and impeachment

Sad
 
When you do not understand the difference between an impeachment inquiry and impeachment

Sad

What I'm clearly stating is the inquiry will lead to an impeachment. @SBJJ still on here constantly all day every day desperate to show everyone how stupid he is.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but If he went to democrats first, he’s not a whistleblower. I believe there is specific language that states that.
I don't know about that we'll see. It doesn't mean anything in his complaint is automatically false. The transcript has corroborated it.
 
Impeachment itself is polling higher than it was for Nixon.
I don't know about that we'll see. It doesn't mean anything in his complaint is automatically false. The transcript has corroborated it.


Reality check, it coming to light that the “whistleblower” went to democrats first (which I’m pretty sure you are no longer legally a wb) makes it a political dud.


Yes it will rule up the base.
Yes it will be a month of headlines.
Yes it will be replaced by the next headline.


But, no, you’ll still be stuck with Trump.
 
So again, they were spending millions but recieving no updates on the opposition research.

And what about the finished product that was desiminated to the media, Intel agencies and Congress? Did those paying for the Dossier never see or know of the Dossier? If so, how did it get spread everywhere?

Who cares? There was nothing improper about the dossier, its construction, or its use. You're just trying to distract from "daddy" being caught compromising national security and using gov't resources for illegal campaign help.
 
Impeachment is polling higher for Trump than it was polling for Clinton or even Nixon... two Presidents that actually got impeached.

He's getting impeached. Now Mitch and his gang of crooks acting on it is another thing entirely.
The WH will put Mitch in an impossible position if there is an article of obstruction for impeachment.
 
What I'm clearly stating is the inquiry will lead to an impeachment. @SBJJ still on here constantly all day every day desperate to show everyone how stupid he is.

Except you posted about polls regarding an inquiry and said it was impeachment

Sad. Very sad. Extremely sad
 
Who cares? There was nothing improper about the dossier, its construction, or its use. You're just trying to distract from "daddy" being caught compromising national security and using gov't resources for illegal campaign help.

You should read all posts before replying.

I said one side is trying to criminalize politics. The Dossier is dirty politics. But you do understand what you are saying is The Trump Campaign can pay for Biden dirt, publish it then hand that dirt to the intelligence agencies for a more thorough investigation. Something tells me that would give you a stroke. And we do not want that. My tribe does it....it is ok! Other tribe does it....they are traitors!!!

Meanwhile you are screaming MSM talking points. Oh! NATIONAL SECURITY! LOL
 
You should read all posts before replying.

I said one side is trying to criminalize politics. The Dossier is dirty politics.

Yes, the GOP is trying to criminalize politics in response to Trump being busted committing multiple crimes so they can just say, "well, everyone does it."

The dossier isn't dirty politics.

But you do understand what you are saying is The Trump Campaign can pay for Biden dirt, publish it then hand that dirt to the intelligence agencies for a more thorough investigation. Something tells me that would give you a stroke. And we do not want that.

Meanwhile you are screaming MSM talking points. Oh! NATIONAL SECURITY! LOL

The MSM doesn't craft talking points, genius. And I'm not saying that. WTF?
 
The question arises from this:
On Friday’s edition of Morning Joe, FEC chair Ellen Weintraub declined to talk about the specifics of Trump’s case but noted that “the law is pretty clear. ... It is absolutely illegal for anyone to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with any election in the United States.”​

Now its obvious that Clinton campaign and other DNC operatives solicited Steele (foriegn national) for the dossier.
And Schiff asked Ukrainian comedians (foreign nationals); that he thought were govt officials, for the pee tape and had his staff follow up with Ukraine's embassy back in '16.

Er, no one was asking for a donation or free services. A campaign can pay a company that employs foreigners for services. :) You're deeply confused about the issues being discussed here.
 
Impeachment itself is polling higher than it was for Nixon.

Apples to Oranges when taking in the difference in media.

But as someone who supports Trump in 2020(unless you nominate Tulsi) I pray the man is impeached
 
Er, no one was asking for a donation or free services. A campaign can pay a company that employs foreigners for services. :) You're deeply confused about the issues being discussed here.

And a president can ask foreign leaders to look into corruption and presidents can even ask foreign leaders for favors.
 
And a president can ask foreign leaders to look into corruption and presidents can even ask foreign leaders for favors.

Do you think it's good that the president withheld essential aid that was approved by Congress in exchange for campaign help? Is it generally good that our foreign policy is being crafted with the intention of helping the president win re-election rather than in the interests of the country?

Obviously, if it weren't someone you perceive to be on your "team," you would not defend such an egregious abuse of power or dishonestly frame it as "asking them to looking into corruption."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top