- Joined
- Feb 5, 2006
- Messages
- 26,902
- Reaction score
- 12,657
I agree. That’ll learn ‘em.
15d.
Man, the Trumpers sure are flocking to this one lol.
As if participation in events and views aren't contemporary metrics with which attention and public interest are measured?Rally size and internet likes… really getting scientific here are we. Most people don’t look at politics like some kind of sport where they go to events to cheer on their team or wear their political beliefs on their sleeve like the many rabid Trump fans did (and still do.) They quietly vote and go on with their life. That was the true “silent majority.”
When it comes to voting? No it’s clearly not. Normal people don’t constantly seek out youtube videos of their favorite politicians in their spare time. Only the obsessed do, which pretty much accounts for most of the Trump cultists on here.As if participation in events and views aren't contemporary metrics with which attention and public interest are measured?
I’m infected? what the hell are you talking about?You're infected.
Trump has an interest in seeing America succeed while Biden has an interest in seeing politics succeed, the people want America to be successful and not continue the old systems of politics...
Trump represents Americans interest whether you want to see it or not or whether it's true or not. People are fed up with old politics which is how he initially got elected. Not voting probably isn't the answer unless voting doesn't matter...
If the Republican Party tries to as you say move on from Trump I guarantee he does everything in his power to wreck the chances of any GOP POTUS candidate in 2024, the Republican party is stuck with Trump at the very least until 20204 unless he dies before but even then his moron kids will try their best to step in and fill his shoes.This is why I think the GOP will move on from Trump at some point. He puts them in enough bad positions that people will either see the self destructive nature and move past it or all these instances will make the establishment dump him as soon as they can get the chance. Not saying he doesn’t have pull but if the people he backs don’t win their races, I think you’ll see more people distance themselves from him.
As if participation in events and views aren't contemporary metrics with which attention and public interest are measured?
If the Republican Party tries to as you say move on from Trump I guarantee he does everything in his power to wreck the chances of any GOP POTUS candidate in 2024, the Republican party is stuck with Trump at the very least until 20204 unless he dies before but even then his moron kids will try their best to step in and fill his shoes.
With that said it couldn't have happened to a more deserving political party.
When it comes to voting? No it’s clearly not. Normal people don’t constantly seek out youtube videos of their favorite politicians in their spare time. Only the obsessed do, which pretty much accounts for most of the Trump cultists on here.
I’m infected? what the hell are you talking about?
This is just fanboy rah-rah shit like I alluded to in my first response to you. You are just spouting out shallow, vague talking points with no deeper meaning or reference to actual policy behind them. It’s clear why you think things like rally size and likes equal actual votes if this is how you actually think.
If rally size was correlated with winning elections Ron Paul would have become president in 2012. Instead he was coming in 3rd place in Republican primaries in which there were only 2 candidates still actually running their campaigns.
Now you’ve quoted my post 3 times without actually saying anything but “but rally size!” Keep living up to your avi dude.so there's no merit to the fact that prior to the "election" the public (the world) openly supports one guy while the guy running against him has zero evidence of public support? i see... don't bother addressing anything beyond "You must be dumb cause you think rally's equal votes"... think beyond the surface if possible...
Zero evidence of public support?so there's no merit to the fact that prior to the "election" the public (the world) openly supports one guy while the guy running against him has zero evidence of public support? i see... don't bother addressing anything beyond "You must be dumb cause you think rally's equal votes"... think beyond the surface if possible...
Nobody gave former vice president Biden a chance. They didn't support his rallys or internet events at all. He fumbled and bumbled and didn't campaign at all... Yet he apparently got the most votes ever... If that's all a person needs to do then Trump certainly has a chance, right? I mean, people showed up all around the world to support him, videos with topics involving Trump had high like to dislike ratios which couldn't be said once for biden and still can't...
We should shitcan the whole voting thing and just tally up balls hanging from trailer hitches versus rainbow stickers. Imo.so there's no merit to the fact that prior to the "election" the public (the world) openly supports one guy while the guy running against him has zero evidence of public support? i see... don't bother addressing anything beyond "You must be dumb cause you think rally's equal votes"... think beyond the surface if possible...
so there's no merit to the fact that prior to the "election" the public (the world) openly supports one guy while the guy running against him has zero evidence of public support? i see... don't bother addressing anything beyond "You must be dumb cause you think rally's equal votes"... think beyond the surface if possible...
LOL!videos with topics involving Trump had high like to dislike ratios which couldn't be said once for biden and still can't...
Trump represents Americans interest whether you want to see it or not or whether it's true or not.
this says all anyone needs to know about where your heads at... get out of your box if possible. You're stunted... You responded to me, not that your cherry picking and misrepresentation deserves legitimate response as you intentionally left out the main point of my original post to really get me on your mutation of an ancillary and mildly hyperbolic point... (i'll spell it out again, One guy had evidence of public support, another guy was said to, if all one needs is the perception of support then whether or not people "vote" he should still have a chance [id est trump tells his fan base not to vote])Now you’ve quoted my post 3 times without actually saying anything but “but rally size!” Keep living up to your avi dude.
I will never understand how this man hypnotized so many people. I genuinely believe people support him so much just to anger and spite the other side.