Law Trump says the Epstein list is a conspiracy created by Obama and Clinton

[Confucamus]

Haven't the full transcripts of the interview been released?

Of the interview, yes. In those transcripts, they actually make a point to say the interview is not "promising anything to her." I've already said I don't believe her Justice Department interview and her transfer are a coincidence, which I believe you and I agree on, no? For us to be right, there had to have been off the books talks that we are not privy to.

FYI, I have not sat down and read the whole transcripts. I'm going off of a summary from The Guardian for right now. They list out some highlights and here is the one I mentioned:

• Blanche said, on the record, that the conversation was not “promising to do anything” for Maxwell. He said that anything she said could not be used against her, unless she provided false statements or there was a retrial in her case.

Link to the article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/22/ghislaine-maxwell-transcript-what-we-know

 

[Strychnine]

The convicted child abuser is a hero now.

 

[Source]

"The left is hating on her [Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted child sex trafficker]"
- @Confucamus

Someone like that should be a mod!

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Of the interview, yes. In those transcripts, they actually make a point to say the interview is not "promising anything to her." I've already said I don't believe her Justice Department interview and her transfer are a coincidence, which I believe you and I agree on, no? For us to be right, there had to have been off the books talks that we are not privy to.

FYI, I have not sat down and read the whole transcripts. I'm going off of a summary from The Guardian for right now. They list out some highlights and here is the one I mentioned:

• Blanche said, on the record, that the conversation was not “promising to do anything” for Maxwell. He said that anything she said could not be used against her, unless she provided false statements or there was a retrial in her case.

Link to the article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/22/ghislaine-maxwell-transcript-what-we-know

No, I don't think it's a coincidence, she made statements clearing Trump so she got a transfer. It would be a serious mistake to take anything this administration states at face value. I know you're deep in this so it's hard to quit cold turkey but Trump is a proven liar.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

Easy. March 1989. Newt Gingrich.

1/2 right , it was Newt and Limbaugh

They both started to demonize the other side in a new nastier way , Newt actually had Republicans move out of the city so they would socialize less with Dems , it used to be quite common for their to be close friendships across the aisle , Newt didn't like that at all he's an evil little shit

 

[Witchhunt]

1/2 right , it was Newt and Limbaugh

They both started to demonize the other side in a new nastier way , Newt actually had Republicans move out of the city so they would socialize less with Dems , it used to be quite common for their to be close friendships across the aisle , Newt didn't like that at all he's an evil little shit

Newt and Willie somehow worked together enough to carve out a lionized fiscal legacy for Clinton..

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

Of the interview, yes. In those transcripts, they actually make a point to say the interview is not "promising anything to her." I've already said I don't believe her Justice Department interview and her transfer are a coincidence, which I believe you and I agree on, no? For us to be right, there had to have been off the books talks that we are not privy to.

FYI, I have not sat down and read the whole transcripts. I'm going off of a summary from The Guardian for right now. They list out some highlights and here is the one I mentioned:

• Blanche said, on the record, that the conversation was not “promising to do anything” for Maxwell. He said that anything she said could not be used against her, unless she provided false statements or there was a retrial in her case.

Link to the article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/22/ghislaine-maxwell-transcript-what-we-know

He probably winked after he said it lol. You really think they'd say "tell us what we want to hear and you'll get a huge reward" on tape?

This whole thing was a dog and pony show to give maga a cope.

 

[DoctorTaco]

He probably winked after he said it lol. You really think they'd say "tell us what we want to hear and you'll get a huge reward" on tape?

This whole thing was a dog and pony show to give maga a cope.

That’s not to say there weren’t other meetings that the press wasn’t privy to through intermediaries and Lawyers. We are talking about literally the most powerful people on the planet.

 

[kflo]

Of the interview, yes. In those transcripts, they actually make a point to say the interview is not "promising anything to her." I've already said I don't believe her Justice Department interview and her transfer are a coincidence, which I believe you and I agree on, no? For us to be right, there had to have been off the books talks that we are not privy to.

FYI, I have not sat down and read the whole transcripts. I'm going off of a summary from The Guardian for right now. They list out some highlights and here is the one I mentioned:

• Blanche said, on the record, that the conversation was not “promising to do anything” for Maxwell. He said that anything she said could not be used against her, unless she provided false statements or there was a retrial in her case.

Link to the article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/22/ghislaine-maxwell-transcript-what-we-know

They literally already gave her a reward in moving her.

 

[MrShady]

Where did I say that, LOLawyer man? Oh' that's right, I didn't.

Man, I really wish you were a lawyer, so I could envision you making these ridiculous arguments in court. Sadly, you're just a pathetic man playing one on a Karate Forum.

And you're just a pathetic Canadian wanting to be an American so bad that you get into bad faith arguments on a Karate Forum.

Who gives a shit about the libs or the left or whatever you're whining about.

I care about why Maxwell got transferred? What was the deal?

And when can we expect to see prosecutions since, by your logic, she got transferred because she gave up some info or names that will help the DOJ prosecute more individuals.

So if 3 months passes, or 6 months, or 1 year...without any prominent names going down, what will you say then?

You're scum and you know it.

 

[Confucamus]

He probably winked after he said it lol. You really think they'd say "tell us what we want to hear and you'll get a huge reward" on tape?

This whole thing was a dog and pony show to give maga a cope.

Cope for what?

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

Cope for what?

Coping with the fact you guys are carrying water for thr people covering up the greatest abuse of minors ever. Maga is now a part of the covering for child abusers.

 

[Confucamus]

Coping with the fact you guys are carrying water for thr people covering up the greatest abuse of minors ever. Maga is now a part of the covering for child abusers.

Oh, okay. I thought you might have a real answer there for a second.

 

[AWilder]

Sad that people are ok with this.

 

[Cajun]

Sad that people are ok with this.

People are ok with this?

 

[Cajun]

Coping with the fact you guys are carrying water for thr people covering up the greatest abuse of minors ever. Maga is now a part of the covering for child abusers.

Come on bruh...

 

[Cajun]

Of the interview, yes. In those transcripts, they actually make a point to say the interview is not "promising anything to her." I've already said I don't believe her Justice Department interview and her transfer are a coincidence, which I believe you and I agree on, no? For us to be right, there had to have been off the books talks that we are not privy to.

FYI, I have not sat down and read the whole transcripts. I'm going off of a summary from The Guardian for right now. They list out some highlights and here is the one I mentioned:

• Blanche said, on the record, that the conversation was not “promising to do anything” for Maxwell. He said that anything she said could not be used against her, unless she provided false statements or there was a retrial in her case.

Link to the article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/22/ghislaine-maxwell-transcript-what-we-know

They set mafia murderers free to take down bosses. Epstein died in 2019 and years later noone has cut her a deal or done anything with what is in the epstein files though both sides have now had their chance. I think it will end up going nowhere tbh. How many girls have been sought out in the case that can identify the men? It just seems that the truth is not likely to ever come out.

 

[heloder]

Oh, okay. I thought you might have a real answer there for a second.

Oh I'd say he has a great point. The days of conservatives in America saying a single thing about "grooming" and child sex trafficking are over. They've been harping on and on about some nebulous threat from the LGBTQ community; calling them groomers and acting like they were monsters come to rape your children in public bathrooms, and of course it was all a politically motivated smear job designed to drag that community through the mud while simultaneously picking up votes from those who care about children.

And what's the actual truth? Are the gays and trannies the real threat to children? Nope. It's Trump and his buddies Epstein and Maxwell, alongside the Catholic and Christian church. Go fucking figure.

MAGA proven to be scumbag liars, once again.

 

[Limbo Pete]

They set mafia murderers free to take down bosses. Epstein died in 2019 and years later noone has cut her a deal or done anything with what is in the epstein files though both sides have now had their chance. I think it will end up going nowhere tbh. How many girls have been sought out in the case that can identify the men? It just seems that the truth is not likely to ever come out.

She HAS been cut a deal. They waved her SO status and moved her to a minimum security resort. Either that was done in exchange for something, or it was done for nothing. And either way it's an abomination.

 

[HOLA]

They set mafia murderers free to take down bosses. Epstein died in 2019 and years later noone has cut her a deal or done anything with what is in the epstein files though both sides have now had their chance. I think it will end up going nowhere tbh. How many girls have been sought out in the case that can identify the men? It just seems that the truth is not likely to ever come out.

Off the top of my head, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Jean Luc Brunel (also died by suicide in prison) Ehud Barak and Bill Richardson have all been publicly mentioned by the girls as people they had sex with. And Trump too, of course.

Edit - add Leon Black and Glen Dubin to the list too.