- Joined
- Oct 13, 2012
- Messages
- 25,244
- Reaction score
- 49,164
Did Q predict this?
Did Q predict this?
At this point, people who are in a picture with DJT but actually are not sex offenders should be considered the exception.
At this point, people who are in a picture with DJT but actually are not sex offenders should be considered the exception.
What don't you understand about this libtard? Anything that triggers the libs is cool and good, up to and including trafficking children for sex.Hey MAGA chuds, how's it feel white knighting the world's most notorious groomer and trafficker?
Because Guilt by Association is not a logical fallacy?
Trump is literally in photos with thousands of people.
Who said anything about guilt? Trump apparently hangs out with a lot of sex offenders (while also being an adjudicated one himself). Just an observation.Because Guilt by Association is not a logical fallacy?
Trump is literally in photos with thousands of people.
Russia saying they have the dirt....
I start it at Russia response on Epstein.
Dimitri Medvedev: "Trump should not think the video archive of his past immoralitirs are only in the hand of Mossad."
The pee tapes are real.
Dimitri Medvedev: "Trump should not think the video archive of his past immoralitirs are only in the hand of Mossad."
The pee tapes are real.
We'll see.Retarded take by Russia, imo.
Unless Trump is pissing on a minor, no one really gonna give a fuck besides the Steele Dossier implications.
If he did, then Russia looks dumb af for acknowledging that they are actively covering up evidence of that.
AI answer:You’d be ok forgetting about the Epstein files and instead just relying on the words of an already convicted sex trafficker, groomer and sexual assaulter of minors?
Again, when was the last time you heard of someone cutting a deal years after they began serving their sentence?
If all they do is release new testimony from Maxwell, that would be abhorrent and indefensible.
Now ask ai how common it is to cut a deal on the same crime they are already serving a sentence for.AI answer:
"Yes, prison informants can receive reduced sentences in exchange for providing information to law enforcement or prosecutors. This practice is common in both federal and state courts, and the potential benefits for informants can range from sentence reductions to complete immunity from prosecution.
How it works:
- Incentives for Informants:
Informants, including those in prison (jailhouse informants), are often incentivized to cooperate with authorities by receiving benefits like reduced charges, sentence reductions, or even improved prison conditions.
- "Substantial Assistance":
In federal cases, a reduced sentence may be granted if an informant provides "substantial assistance" to investigators, such as information about other crimes or criminals."
Now ask ai how common it is to cut a deal on the same crime they are already serving a sentence for.
Maxwell is not a jailhouse informant. Nor is she providing assistance about other crimes. She’s providing assistance on the crimes she’s already serving time for.
Post sentencing deals are very rare and certainly rarer for the people leading the criminal enterprise.
You think any of these deals will give up your lord and master?You don't know if she's giving up powerful people and has agreed to testify against them under oath...
and/or
assisting in catching other scumbags in the human sex trafficking business to save current women/girls enslaved...
and/or
giving up Mossad / CIA operatives who were involved.
If any of those are true, would it change your view?
You don't know if she's giving up powerful people and has agreed to testify against them under oath...
Sorry but she doesn’t get leniency for providing the sex trafficking of minors by giving up people she trafficked girls to, years after already being convicted and serving time.You don't know if she's giving up powerful people and has agreed to testify against them under oath...
So 5 years after being arrested she’s now interested in saving girls?and/or
assisting in catching other scumbags in the human sex trafficking business to save current women/girls enslaved...
The only way any of that can have any plausible way of being true is if they were already in the Epstein files. And until we get transparency of what evidence they have, in totality, no I won’t change my view.and/or
giving up Mossad / CIA operatives who were involved.
If any of those are true, would it change your view?
I mean would we be this militant against other Dems? I'd like him to name a single person they'd defend for this travesty against children. He won't name our users here because there are none and he's pulling it out of his ass.