• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Trump says the Epstein list is a conspiracy created by Obama and Clinton

Do you believe Trump is in the Epstein List?

  • Yes, absolutely.

    Votes: 222 55.8%
  • Yes, probably.

    Votes: 113 28.4%
  • No, he's not on the list.

    Votes: 28 7.0%
  • No, there is no list. So of course he's not on it.

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • I'm on the fence.

    Votes: 17 4.3%

  • Total voters
    398
Why would a Starcraft master spend their valuable time and minerals arguing with a bunch of soiled babies?

Because I'm Joey, a man of the people. Always trying to shine that light into the darkness and teach my fellow man. I'm not arguing with you, I'm teaching you, o megálos dáskalos, I am the great teacher. I follow the morals of an ancient wisdom long lost from this world.
 
Because I'm Joey, a man of the people. Always trying to shine that light into the darkness and teach my fellow man. I'm not arguing with you, I'm teaching you, o megálos dáskalos, I am the great teacher. I follow the morals of an ancient wisdom long lost from this world.
I mean, didn't Starcraft come out in, like, 1998? That's not exactly ancient history imo
 
A list of unindicted co-conspirators which were four women who worked with Epstein an

Do you not understand that to indict someone you need to build a case and that to publish a story you need to verify its content, especially in regards to something so grave and incendiary?

Do you expect the government to just publish documents that imply guilt without an indictment? For a publication to print something unverified that could open them to lawsuits?

Just think it through for one minute.
How did they convict Maxwell if they don't have evidence? How does it take ten years to sift through bank records and videos?

You really the the FBI has been working the case for ten years and don't have a list of names yet? Certainly this info has been in authorities hands for well over ten years.

The government is protecting the perpetrators.


Why don't we know where the 1.5 billion in Epstein's account came from? Certainly not because they are still chasing down leads. It doesn't take ten years to do this stuff.
 
4254538_b6ed948bd53673668c704a4784057cfd_jpeg2c7f341731a84add07f1faf9e38da12d

the White half of Obama knows the score.
 
lol. I answered your question tard.

Again, you’re asking why evidence wasn’t leaked about ONE guy, when evidence hasn’t been leaked about anyone. I asked you questions related to this point, which is the entire point, and you chose to ignore.

Again, you’ve convinced yourself that the one guy to exclude unequivocally is the guy who is now calling the whole thing a hoax, has said the info in the files about him is false, is a known sexual predator, was friends with Epstein for over 15 years and knew of his proclivities involving young girls, has made comments about his own behavior at miss teen USA pageants, and has complete control over the release of the information in the files.

That's his modus operandi, he gets curb stomped and then claims victory, he's like the fighter who got completely demolished, his face looks like hamburger and after the final bell still raises his arms trying to convince somebody, anybody he won .
 
It's not hard to be convicted in a country of corrupt judges, if we're being honest. He was literally found liable for rape with not a shred of evidence lol. Nobody takes the American Judicial system seriously. I'm serious though we all laugh at how stupid your court systems are, its a joke.

Again though, I'm not saying the Epstein files were made by the democrats, or that they had altered files or added names, I'm just saying given their history, there's really no reason to believe they wouldn't stoop to that level, considering they've done much worse. Realistically anyone here supporting the democrats, support a group of the most corrupt politicians in American history, a literal criminal organization trying to subvert power and take over the US government by manufacturing evidence to prosecute political opponents. Anyone supporting them should be ashamed tbh.

There's no proof Trump was involved in anything that Epstein had going on with underage girls, that's just the facts. I'm not willing to jump to conclusions like many of you do, because like I've said there are many possible reasons why they aren't being released which have nothing to do with Trump at all. But everyone wants to make it about Trump because of TDS. You're all so desperate for trump to be a diddler that you've lost all common sense.

You do realize that judges who were appointed by Regan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, Obama, and Trump all meted out justice to those criminals, right?

OH and...


ADKq_NbD3_j2U_LXJBZo3Km3ScrSpKOhDNNXnQDNwswlwJlzvQnt_98-kTC-2u9UEr1SMHjztSBdfTMVQYgGg6F2FmdBGix6sYiazlyzbERKOiMHvcr6onDNqn71hMQj5HlPdtU-KCNxoOvv=s0-d-e1-ft




 
It's fine. I don't think anyone on the right believed that Trump was doing Russian collusion Etc. If there is something there then ok. Let it play out. Just saying that I'd rather not continue to muddy up presidents at this point. If Obama allowed this nonsense then my biggest hope is that it doesn't happen in the future. But the government screwing around seems like it will always be with us
If Obama.... yeah, it's not even comparable, Trump is the guy you need to look at and he welcomed Russian interference. If you're out there claiming "witch hunt, no collusion" you need to open your eyes. The Russians made contact with Trump's campaign officials and they welcomed the help.
 
0
If people were being flown out to an island, there are flight logs. Epstein wasn’t operating without clients.
"List" is pretty ambiguous. There are certainly "lists" of people Epstein dealt with or flew on his private jet, but there is no list saying who did what.

Now, there are probably some other forms of evidence that could at least nab a few of them, but we're never ever gonna see that shit. Ever. The best we'll ever, maybe get, is some ambiguous flight logs and client list to his business. Nether will prove a damn thing.
 
If Obama.... yeah, it's not even comparable, Trump is the guy you need to look at and he welcomed Russian interference. If you're out there claiming "witch hunt, no collusion" you need to open your eyes. The Russians made contact with Trump's campaign officials and they welcomed the help.
Whatever the evidence shows the evidence shows. Whether Obama did this thing or help this thing or Trump did this thing or help this thing I don't care. Get to the facts. All of this has been sitting there for almost 10 years.
 
But that draws all that much more attention to the whole thing that people already wanted to know. Also hope everything's good your way bro
Since when has Trump ever given a flying fuck about the negative aspects of drawing attention to anything?

About the last sentence, check your pms--in a few... :)
 
Since when has Trump ever given a flying fuck about the negative aspects of drawing attention to anything?

About the last sentence, check your pms--in a few... :)
When it's possibly the rest of his life in prison I imagine
 
When it's possibly the rest of his life in prison I imagine
Up to now, he's lived up to the "Teflon Don" moniker.

He managed to avoid prosecution for multiple serious crimes just by running for office, which is nothing but constantly drawing attention to himself.

Now, he doesn't give a fuck because he's either in his last term, or he's going to end proper elections by 2028.
 
Lol, you're falling apart again. That is nothing close to an answer, you bitched out and tried to deflect again. We have accusations against Prince Andrew, JB Pritzker's cousin, Marvin Minsky, Bill Richardson, several of the girls talked about Bill Clinton "liking them young" and being on the plane often, and we have a pretty good list of people who were still hanging out with him after he was already convicted of banging kids and was a registered sex offender, including George Slopadolpoulos and Reid Hoffman, who paid E Jean Carrol to accuse Trump, and NY changed the goddamn law just to allow the suit for which there was never any evidence or even a year it's supposed to have happened.

What the hell would qualify as "evidence" to you if the girls naming Prince Andrew, giving detailed descriptions of being raped by him, suing him, providing photos proving he was where they said he was with the underage girls at Epstein's house, and his bizarre interview claiming he can't sweat and it couldn't have been him because he remembers being at a Pizza Express on the random Sunday 17 years earlier?

Now suddenly nothing short of DNA and video of the rape count as "evidence", but you are absolutely fine taking an 80 year old Fire marshal Bill lookalike's claim of being fingerbanged when she was like 60 without even knowing the year as absolute proof. There's not a single person who's attracted to both senior citizens and underage kids, but you don't even require a credible story when it's someone you don't like.

So I'll ask again, why would they not prosecute or leak evidence of Trump banging children if they had it? Don't deflect, and I'm not interested in what you accept as evidence against other people who they would cover for, I'm asking why they wouldn't prosecute the guy they would never in a million years cover for, and have been in a 10 year scramble for damaging information against, and already have prosecuted and investigated for anything real or imagined they could come up with.
lol.

Damn. Looks like I have to repeat myself. They have not arrested a single person connected to Epstein, other than Ghislaine. No one. Not one person. They have not leaked a single piece of evidence. Nothing. Yet you continue to insist this means trump is completely innocent. Trump and trump alone is innocent because he hasn’t been arrested (no one has) and because evidence against him hasn’t been leaked (no evidence has been leaked).

You can spare me the word salad. I have no idea what your post was even about.

By the way, that “60 year old woman” Trump thought was his ex-wife in a photo from back then (back when he was married to her).
 
I think the real story here is Trump is feeling under attack because he's on the Epstein list, and it's triggering him because he's remembering being persecuted for being a Russian asset - which he has been, for quite some time.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,271,115
Messages
57,702,112
Members
175,810
Latest member
lawfulgood
Back
Top