• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Trump says the Epstein list is a conspiracy created by Obama and Clinton

Do you believe Trump is in the Epstein List?

  • Yes, absolutely.

    Votes: 219 55.4%
  • Yes, probably.

    Votes: 113 28.6%
  • No, he's not on the list.

    Votes: 28 7.1%
  • No, there is no list. So of course he's not on it.

    Votes: 18 4.6%
  • I'm on the fence.

    Votes: 17 4.3%

  • Total voters
    395
I thought the "enigmas never age" just refers to them staying youthful, even as older men. The other line is more suspect though.

'enigmas never age' sounds too smart for Trump, somehow, doesn't feel like an authentic Trump use of language to me. if he did say it he was just copying what he heard someone else say.
 
Not trying to call you out, just picking on this comment because I hear this position a lot - but I'm not sure I can name a single person I think Donald would risk his presidency to protect.

Like as the most extreme hypothetical I can think of -> Do we think even Don Jr being implicated would be an important enough name for Trump to protect? For sure not Eric lol.

haha. yeah, Eric would be going bye-bye if Donny had to push that lever
 
Don't forget peed on hookers and dove across the beast to wrestle control away from the secret service. Still waiting on that pee tape the left have been telling me is going to be released any day now for the last decade.
Because as long as a pee tape doesn't exist you can wave away all this stuff too... <YeahOKJen>
 
Lol, MAGAts are still in here trying to run interference for Diddlin' Don, despite the fact that, at the very least, we know he's covering for Peter Files, and he probably is one himself.

Company men to the bitter fucking end, huh?
I'm starting to get suspicious about what's on  their hard drives.

The Left Cult happened long ago with the belief that a woman can have a dick, blue hair, and random pronouns.
A cult typically involves blind allegiance to a central charismatic leader.

Seriously, do some research on actual cults and cult behavior.

You might find it very interesting.
 
Last edited:
You fell for it again.



so which conservative sent that one in as a distraction?

that doesn't really sound like doe 174 at all. but all i want to know is did the fraudy orange rapist supposedly send that letter before or after he sexually assaulted that crazy cat lady inside of a department store and then cheated on yet another one of his wives again, this time raw dogging a whore from the gangbang videos who reminded him of his daughter?
 
Last edited:
I'm starting to get suspicious about what's on  their hard drives.


A cult typically involves blind allegiance to a central charismatic leader.

Seriously, do some research on actual cults and cult behavior.

You might find it very interesting.

Some also understand the violence but justify that bigger, more important policy goals are at play like tax cuts and deporting brown people with dark hair.

And some of these guys fully understand that r*pe is a part of putting wild women in their place and see it as a natural and appealing part of their preferred world.

In a conservative hierarchy, a white king pussy-grabbing, r*ping, and barging into half naked young girls for the explicit goal of perving on them is just reinforcing the social order.
 
I mean people calling this opinion you stated or similar claims as standing up for Trump. Trump was a democrat when all of this was going down, to act like the democrats don't have blood on their hands is insane, but somehow pointing that out makes me a deranged Trump Cultist, this is despite the fact as a Canadian it would be in my best interest for him to leave office immediately.

Who cares what party he was or even is representing? What I'm trying to tell you is that most people aren't so insistent on framing this as a Dems vs Reps issue as you. The fact that you're Canadian and do this makes it even more concerning, from a mental health perspective.

Trump was a Democrat, and now he is a Republican, but the Republican party of today is wildly different from what it's classically been, anyway. It's the MAGA party now. That's what most people are talking about - they're talking about the things Trump is doing because Trump is tied at the hip to the whole Epstein affair

You keep saying things like, "to act like Democrats don't have blood on their hands..." - who is doing that, man? this is a weird phantasm you've created in your head because whenever you hear anything about Trump you immediately jump to whataboutisms. I don't know that I'd call you a deranged cultist, but this is indeed a pretty unnecessary leaping to defensive accusations in the face of a very legitimate criticism of Epstein's best buddy who campaigned on these supposed files and now is gaslighting everyone.
 
Intelligence agencies did not have access to the evidence. The DOJ did. Why would the CIA, Homeland Security or anyone in the IC have access to any of this?

There is no list of clients. There are flight logs with lists of passengers to his private island, and he has a list of contacts he kept in a book like the good old days before cell phones. How could you connect any of that to organization of child sex trafficking and names of clients? You can't. And if the Democrats had that evidence, they would have gone after the culprits. Now that Trump and Bondi have the evidence, they are quick to realize they have nothing. But they fanned the flames, especially Bondi with her statement that they have the documents sitting on her table, to imply the list is in there. So you got MAGA conspiracy nuts all horny waiting for it to be released, but they didn't because it was all one giant lie.

And then Trump called you stupid for believing there was a list in the first place. That's what the President thinks of you.



how can you convict someone of trafficking some without trafficking them to someone and knowing who that was?
 
I thought some of these postings were rather humorous.

The Reactions to the WSJ's Trainwreck Trump-Epstein Story Are Hilarious​



Again, I can’t believe we all waited for this bombshell Trump-Epstein story to drop, only for it to be a total dud. Oh, wait, I can believe it because we’ve all been through this during the Russian collusion hoax. The Wall Street Journal better get its lawyers mobilized because a lawsuit from President Trump is coming. The paper alleged that Trump sent a “bawdy” letter to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003.


All encounters between the two men occurred before the 2008 fallout and when Mr. Epstein’s sordid and aberrant sexual appetites for minors were revealed. They describe this letter, but don’t publish it. Even Elon Musk, who is no longer in favor with the Trump camp, threw cold water on the story, casting doubt on the entire premise. The letter apparently is a doodle of a woman—you could imagine how people reacted to this:....
 
Nothing to unite everybody behind Trump again than an obviously fake “letter” and mainstream media hit piece. WSJ fucked up

The people getting united behind him are getting smaller and smaller now I think. We're down to the people who are willing to hand wave covering up for nonces now. If you're one of them then that's unfortunate.
 
so which conservative sent that one in as a distraction?

that doesn't really sound like doe 174 at all. but all i want to know is did the fraudy orange rapist supposedly send that letter before or after he sexually assaulted that crazy cat lady inside of a department store and then cheated on yet another one of his wives again, this time raw dogging a whore from the gangbang videos who reminded him of his daughter?
"Enigmas never age, have you noticed?"

Sounds exactly like some cringe nonsense he would spew when trying to be cute.

The meaningless and unnecessary "have you noticed that?" is a very Trumpy.

"Everyone's saying..."

"Have you noticed..."
 
Last edited:
Why didn’t Biden release it?
Biden never said he was going to release the Epstein list , Trump himself said that while Biden was president now he’s just pulled a bait and switch . Biden never released it bc most likely it has some former active democrats on it which may have hurt his own party perception but the fact is Trump is on that list that’s why the senate Republicans have blocked it now from being released and now want a no binding clause if it does to deflect from Trump .

One has to be very pathetic at this point to remotely defend Trump just on this topic alone , HES the president he was found guilty of sexual assault and not charged with grape bc the court found he used his fingers to penetrate his victim which was lessened charges to assault .

Yea that’s the guy any Trumper is defending on here who actually was allowed to run fir president after that fact .
 
<LikeReally5>


You should talk to George Stephanopoulos about why ABC had to pay Trump $15 million after he said a jury found Trump as 'liable for rape' on air.

And you're under the false impression that the whole of Trump's supporters are die-hard cultists. You're going to stick with that delusion even after I point out that Trump was booed loudly at a campaign rally after encouraging everyone to get vaccinated, and he's received the most backlash of his political career from his own supporters over how badly he's handled the Epstein List issue.

And you're confusing the right for the left about the acceptance of :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia. That's what this whole thing is about.... Rich elite :eek::eek::eek::eek:philies being publicly exposed and criminally prosecuted.


It ain't the right who's trying to normalize 'Maps' as a term.
I hope you're right. I sincerely hope you're right. I sincerely hope that MAGA will hound Donald Trump about Epstein until nothing but the truth is revealed. And revealed within the next year. Let the chips fall where they may, let all these fucking arseholes be prosecuted, and let this be a lesson to all those in charge.

But it's not going to happen that way. It is going to be interesting how they try and slow sweep Jizz-lane under the carpet and prosecute not one more soul. And unfortunately, get the fuck away with it.
 
I find it funnny that lefties are so locked in on the Epstein files, anything their little slimy fingers can grab ahold of they run with.
 
There's no such thing as the epstein list with all the powerful people on it, it never existed.

theres flight logs, possibly other evidence, but no epstein list. the media is pushing for it so hard, because the dems already know it doesnt exist.
 
There's no such thing as the epstein list with all the powerful people on it, it never existed.

theres flight logs, possibly other evidence, but no epstein list. the media is pushing for it so hard, because the dems already know it doesnt exist.

So in February, which is only 5 months ago, when Pam Bondi wrote to Kash Patel "acknowledged receiving the Epstein files containing" the convicted sex offender's "list of contacts and a list of victims' names," it was what, exactly?

is it some kind of reverse-Schrodinger deal, where it is simultaneously a list and not a list?
 
Back
Top