A list of what, though? Some flight logs? A client list? Okay, that's gonna include a whole bunch of people who dealt with him legitimately. What does releasing some ambiguous list get anyone? Should people just assume they were all fucking kids, including the wealthy women who are likely on that list as well? It would open a whole other can of worms, where the public would be tasked with blindly sorting it all out.
Is there "evidence" of people who were doing wrong? Certainly, and that should be made public. This whole "list" obsession is a bit silly though. That's what you don't want to be released, because it won't actually reveal anything, and would likely give more cover to the government to play dumb about who did what.
Fuck some ambiguous list that will just raise more questions than it answers, and just have everyone chaotically pointing fingers from their partisan camps. Release the actual evidence of wrongdoing. Let's have an actual discovery of evidence released, that they used to charge both of them with. We already have "lists" of known associates that are easily accessible. Should we go burn down Chris Tucker's house, because he's on it?