Law Trump says the Epstein list is a conspiracy created by Obama and Clinton

Do you believe Trump is in the Epstein List?

  • Yes, absolutely.

    Votes: 259 57.8%

  • Yes, probably.

    Votes: 125 27.9%

  • No, he's not on the list.

    Votes: 28 6.3%

  • No, there is no list. So of course he's not on it.

    Votes: 18 4.0%

  • I'm on the fence.

    Votes: 18 4.0%
  • Total voters
    448
Soggust said:
Zero chance.

They would offer her a proffer session if they weren't sure whether or not she had valuable intel.

You don't get a deal for simply showing up to talk. The information has to be truthful and useful.

There is no scenario where a normal admin gives a deal in exchange for simply showing up denying guilt.
Click to expand...
It wasn't a plea deal or an ongoing investigation to be looking for "valuable intel", her trial was 4 years ago. That's what they would be looking for if it was an investigation into someone else and she claimed to have information. They only interviewed her because YOU wouldn't accept that the president wasn't a child molester and demanding he prove a negative.

There are plenty of journalists with sources who have access to the justice department files and they all said that while Trump's name is mentioned among the 150-200 names, none implicated him in anything criminal or sexual, the victims who did name people were asked repeatedly and specifically about Trump, and they said they never saw him having anything to do with Epstein sex schemes, so now they go to his co-conspirator who says the same.

You can blame yourself for insisting there must be some super secret "intel" somewhere implicating the president in a child molestation plot, and maybe ask yourself why you're so disappointed to learn that the president isn't a child molester.
 
Last edited:
nostradumbass said:
It wasn't a plea deal or an ongoing investigation to be looking for "valuable intel", her trial was 4 years ago. That's what they would be looking for if it was an investigation into someone else and she claimed to have information. They only interviewed her because YOU wouldn't accept that the president wasn't a child molester and demanding he prove a negative.

There are plenty of journalists with sources who have access to the justice department files and they all said that while Trump's name is mentioned among the 150-200 names, none implicated him in anything criminal or sexual, the victims who did name people were asked repeatedly and specifically about Trump, and they said they never saw him having anything to do with Epstein sex schemes, so now they go to his co-conspirator who says the same.

You can blame yourself for insisting there must be some super secret "intel" somewhere implicating the president in a child molestation plot, and maybe ask yourself why you're so disappointed to learn that the president isn't a child molester.
Click to expand...

Now we are saying that the reason Donald Trump's BOP transferred arguably the world's most infamous sex trafficker to a lower security prison is because.... she satisfied the leftist media's thirst for an interview? Despite no new evidence and lying in the interview?

I assure you they didn't consider my opinion, lol.
 
Cajun said:
I don't agree with you. I think it was pulled out just before the election to keep him from running. But there is normally somewhat of a rush when you are talking about child predators which in this case seems accurate so that they will not offend before they are actually charged
Click to expand...
Well we don't know what's in the files. We don't know what the governments case was against Epstein because it never went to trial. Maybe they were hoping to get a plea deal and convict others but he died under Trump's watch in mysterious circumstances. You can see how it would be difficult to get convictions without testimonies from a dead guy who was the alleged ringleader.
 
Cajun said:
I thought she met with the justice department. Again all of the other questions I stated are valid. If I was the DNC I would have cut her a deal to let her out if Trump was involved and she knew it during Bidens term. People are already saying she has no credible testimony and has lied over and over. So I don't know what cutting a deal will do one way or another without her possessing some type of proof.
Click to expand...
Maybe just maybe Democrats aren't engaging in lawfare like you "centrists" imagine...
 
Retards (confucamus and nostradumbasses) won't address this point

Maxwell lied repeatedly, even during the Todd Blanche interview. Blatant lies.

Why did she get transferred? Why is this deal so secretive? Why would you make a deal with a known liar?

 
nostradumbass said:
It wasn't a plea deal or an ongoing investigation to be looking for "valuable intel", her trial was 4 years ago. That's what they would be looking for if it was an investigation into someone else and she claimed to have information. They only interviewed her because YOU wouldn't accept that the president wasn't a child molester and demanding he prove a negative.

There are plenty of journalists with sources who have access to the justice department files and they all said that while Trump's name is mentioned among the 150-200 names, none implicated him in anything criminal or sexual, the victims who did name people were asked repeatedly and specifically about Trump, and they said they never saw him having anything to do with Epstein sex schemes, so now they go to his co-conspirator who says the same.

You can blame yourself for insisting there must be some super secret "intel" somewhere implicating the president in a child molestation plot, and maybe ask yourself why you're so disappointed to learn that the president isn't a child molester.
Click to expand...
Epsteins chief butler who snagged the black book said Trump was involved with child trafficking.
 
the left still pathetically hoping to tie trump to epstein, meanwhile they keep losing and just can't figure out why.
 
CantCucktheTuck said:
Keep hoping for that super secret "intel" to be uncovered. I'm sure it's out there somewhere. Meanwhile MAGA will keep racking up the wins.
Click to expand...
Trump was the one saying they had all the intel and would release it, then literally begged people on Truth Social to stop talking about it
 
trumpfile.org

Ghislaine Maxwell says Jeffrey Epstein recorded Trump with his victims (March 1, 2016)

Sometime "in early 2016," Ghislaine Maxwell tells CBS producer Ira Rosen that Epstein has tapes of Donald Trump and Bill Clinton, but she doesn't know where he keeps them. Rosen sits on this conversation for five years, saving it for his 2021 book Ticking Clock: Behind the Scenes at "60…
trumpfile.org trumpfile.org

Maxwell said Epstein had Trump and Clinton on tape with young girls.
Since all the Trump lovers said we should believe anything Maxwell says, or does her saying Trump is guilty does not count.
 
CantCucktheTuck said:
Keep hoping for that super secret "intel" to be uncovered. I'm sure it's out there somewhere. Meanwhile MAGA will keep racking up the wins.
Click to expand...

Are you insinuating MAGA is happy with Epstein conspirators getting leniency and co conspirators getting away with their crimes?

Whatever makes you happy lol

You do realize according to Maxwell, even Clinton is innocent.

Braindead cultists happy as long as their daddy is in the clear.
 
MrShady said:
Are you insinuating MAGA is happy with Epstein conspirators getting leniency and co conspirators getting away with their crimes?

Whatever makes you happy lol

You do realize according to Maxwell, even Clinton is innocent.

Braindead cultists happy as long as their daddy is in the clear.
Click to expand...
He's not a cultist. He doesn't even care about Trump or politics. He just likes being annoying online because he thinks its fun

Like a middle schooler with no attention at home
 
WklySportsMemes said:
Hey silly foreign goof who doesn't understand simple American legal concepts.
He got off because he gave information to help with the prosecution of other criminals or information for actual crimes that were committed.

Being the wingman for your perverted fuckboy buddy & saying "hes a good guy" is not prosecuting any criminals or giving any information for actual proven crimes.

Lmao at rewarding an international perjuring convicted child molester because she said generic non negative things about Trump who isn't charged with anything. She also defended Epstein... nimrod
Click to expand...

That comparison is dumb even for that idiot.
 
Last Samurai said:
She got transferred because of what she said.

The public may not understand what is going on, but Ghislaine knows very well. She has received the message loud and clear - that Trump has the power and will continue to use it abuse it in order to help her (provided she cooperates).
Click to expand...

Wait until he dies from a heart attack before giving her the pardon.
 
MrShady said:
Are you insinuating MAGA is happy with Epstein conspirators getting leniency and co conspirators getting away with their crimes?

Whatever makes you happy lol

You do realize according to Maxwell, even Clinton is innocent.

Braindead cultists happy as long as their daddy is in the clear.
Click to expand...
No...I'm saying MAGA is laughing at the left's continued insistence that their fan fiction about trump being an Epstein client is true. While the left continues to fall for their own propaganda MAGA keeps racking up the wins.
 
CantCucktheTuck said:
No...I'm saying MAGA is laughing at the left's continued insistence that their fan fiction about trump being an Epstein client is true. While the left continues to fall for their own propaganda MAGA keeps racking up the wins.
Click to expand...
Do you consider moving a women who observed and participated in the raping teenage girls to a cushy prison, a win?
 
DoctorTaco said:
Epsteins chief butler who snagged the black book said Trump was involved with child trafficking.
Click to expand...
Lol, that's an outright lie, and neither did any of the other Butlers. The one guy who was Epstein’s Butler for the entire time he knew Trump was specifically asked and said no, and said the handful of times Trump ate there, he didn't even sit at the table with the other rich people and just ate with the butler in the kitchen.

The other Butler, Cotrin, is the one who said Epstein claimed Trump offered him a job at the white house, but said that was bullshit because they hadn't even spoken in over 12 years when Trump became president.

The butler you're clinging to hope on didn't accuse Trump either. He was a butler for 6 months after Epstein and Trump already weren’t speaking and just cobbled together some famous people's phone numbers and tried to sell them and went to prison.

Of the victims, the main one Virginia who was naming people said she never saw and doesn't believe Trump had any involvement in any wrongdoing, the other one "Jane" also said she never saw or heard of Trump getting any massage or having any inappropriate contact with any of the girls.

Looks like you're just stuck with firemarshall bill reciting plots from Law and Order SVU and pretending she got finger blasted in a locker room at age 60.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,156
Messages
57,971,431
Members
175,886
Latest member
Dagestanaev

Share this page

Back
Top