Social Trump says he "can't work with democrats"

yeah, i didn't read it. it's why i quoted it. /s

still waiting. oh, right. you were just lying and you got nothin'

You quoted two instances, neglecting to address the rest. Either you didn't read anything but the summaries you cherrypicked, or you did and are obfuscating on purpose.
 
You quoted two instances, neglecting to address the rest. Either you didn't read anything but the summaries you cherrypicked, or you did and are obfuscating on purpose.

"the rest"

MF0qT3I.gif


STILL waiting to hear what happened other than social media shitposting and podesta being phished...

and ffs, are they summaries or did i cherrypick? PICK ONE. DERP!
 
"the rest"

MF0qT3I.gif


STILL waiting to hear what happened other than social media shitposting and podesta being phished...

and ffs, are they summaries or did i cherrypick? PICK ONE. DERP!

You seem to be perpetuating a misunderstanding on your part. It's not what I'm proving, but what the report, which I provided, shows. If you are not willing to read so much as the table of contents, it is your fault, alone. I don't see what your problem is.
 
You seem to be perpetuating a misunderstanding on your part. It's not what I'm proving, but what the report, which I provided, shows. If you are not willing to read so much as the table of contents, it is your fault, alone. I don't see what your problem is.

please post this. i want to laugh when the table of contents glaringly disproves your bullshit.

hint: my protip was from the toc.
 
For the third time, since finding a link from earlier in this thread is also too tough for you.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/full-mueller-report-pdf/index.html

...*whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh*

so you... can't cite anything, then? GEE, I WONDER WHY.

fine, i guess i'll do it for you.

I. THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATION
II. RUSSIAN "ACTIVE MEASURES" SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN
Ill. RUSSIAN HACKING AND DUMPING OPERATIONS


wait, these are the things i mentioned. and yet, you said there's more. "dozens" more. i guess IV must contain all the "dozens" of terrible things in the "systematic attack" of russia...

IV. RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT LINKS To AND CONTACTS WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN

oh. or not. it's just... this nothingburger.

well, there's still more, right? maybe part V is where all of your "dozens" are?

V. PROSECUTION AND DECLINATION DECISIONS

oh.

you got nothin'

i literally just referenced that. or do you believe the "systematic attack" was something much more grander than social media garbage/phishing podesta? if so, enlighten. hint: you won't. because that's all it was.

wow. 6 pages later, and i'm still right. WHAT A SHOCKER
 
...*whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh*

so you... can't cite anything, then? GEE, I WONDER WHY.

fine, i guess i'll do it for you.

I. THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATION
II. RUSSIAN "ACTIVE MEASURES" SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN
Ill. RUSSIAN HACKING AND DUMPING OPERATIONS


wait, these are the things i mentioned. and yet, you said there's more. "dozens" more. i guess IV must contain all the "dozens" of terrible things in the "systematic attack" of russia...

IV. RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT LINKS To AND CONTACTS WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN

oh. or not. it's just... this nothingburger.

well, there's still more, right? maybe part V is where all of your "dozens" are?

V. PROSECUTION AND DECLINATION DECISIONS

oh.

you got nothin'



wow. 6 pages later, and i'm still right. WHAT A SHOCKER

II and III contain many sub sections detailing the instances you insist are not there, and the different methods and tactics used by the Russians.
 
I wouldn't either. They are fucking heartless and psychotic.
 
II and III contain many sub sections detailing the instances you insist are not there, and the different methods and tactics used by the Russians.

so II is all about "SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN" but you think that's "dozens" of other things, too? lolz! "dozens" of magical other things that you know about but mueller's team did not? and that's why it just can't be cited?
 
so II is all about "SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN" but you think that's "dozens" of other things, too? lolz! "dozens" of magical other things that you know about but mueller's team did not? and that's why it just can't be cited?

I insisted you read the document yourself, and linked the report. After three tries you agreed to upon a third posting of said link. I will not read for you. Both sections II and III contain over 2 dozen subheaders that detail specific actions and methods taken by the Russian government to systematically attack our election.

I fail to see your problem if you are really expecting me to read it all for you. I don't get this "No, you eat my vegetables!!" petulance on your part.
 
I insisted you read the document yourself, and linked the report. After three tries you agreed to upon a third posting of said link. I will not read for you. Both sections II and III contain over 2 dozen subheaders that detail specific actions and methods taken by the Russian government to systematically attack our election.

I fail to see your problem if you are really expecting me to read it all for you. I don't get this "No, you eat my vegetables!!" petulance on your part.

lolz @ me expecting you to "read it all" when you can't even cite ONE thing from it.

btw, these "subheaders" are........ oh, right. EXACTLY what i already described. disagree? PROVE IT. post something. anything. you won't. cuz you can't. hence, 6 pages of running away from your own keyboard's claims.


check out all of these things that's totally different:

II. RUSSIAN "ACTIVE MEASURES" SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN
A. Structure of the Internet Research Agency
B. Funding and Oversight from Concord and Prigozhin
C. The IRA Targets U.S. Elections .
1. The IRA Ramps Up U.S. Operations As Early As 2014
2. U.S. Operations Through IRA-Controlled Social Media Accounts
3. U.S. Operations Through Facebook.
4. U.S. Operations Through Twitter
a. Individualized Accounts
b. IRA Botnet Activities
5. U.S. Operations Involving Political Rallies
6. Targeting and Recruitment of U.S. Persons
7. Interactions and Contacts with the Trump Campaign
a. Trump Campaign Promotion ofIRA Political Materials
b. Contact with Trump Campaign Officials in C onnection to Rallies

MY BAD, YOU'RE SO RIGHT. IT DIFFERENTIATES BETWEEN FACEBOOK AND TWITTER, THAT'S SO DIFFERENT! /S

guess what each of these is about - did you guess "social media campaign" like the title said?

i mean... look, political rallies! that's not just shitposting on social media, right? right? ...right?

The IRA organized and promoted political rallies inside the United States while posing as U.S. grassroots activists. First, the IRA used one of its preexisting social media personas (Facebook groups and Twitter accounts, for example) to announce and promote the event. The IRA then sent a large number of direct messages to followers of its social media account asking them to attend the event

WRONG.
 
Last edited:
how about recruitment? i mean, this is still under the "social media campaign," but you insist there's more to it so... you know, it's gotta be here, right? everything else struck out...

IRA employees frequently used Twitter, Facebook, and lnstagram to contact and recruit U.S. persons who followed the group.

oh. so... wait. the "social media campaign" really is just a... social media campaign?! UNPOSSIBLE! you said there's more to it! you said there were "dozens" of other things!

it's... it's as if this really was just "social media garbage/phishing podesta," or something!

@hillelslovak87
 
Last edited:
how about recruitment? i mean, this is still under the "social media campaign," but you insist there's more to it so... you know, it's gotta be here, right? everything else struck out...



oh. so... wait. the "social media campaign" really is just a... social media campaign?! UNPOSSIBLE! you said there's more to it! you said there were "dozens" of other things!

it's... it's as if this really was just "social media garbage/phishing podesta," or something!

@hillelslovak87

You're doing nothing here but showing the poverty of the American educational apparatus regarding reading comprehension.
 
You've been linked the Mueller report. Even so much as reading the table of contents shows you dozens of instances of interference utilizing numerous methods.

What is it with you guys expecting everyone to read for you?

"dozens"
"numerous"
MF0qT3I.gif

ie: the TWO instances i mentioned on page 5.
 
Last edited:

And? You've made it clear you're able to read the report, yet are only willing to admit that there was a tad bit of social media posts and maybe a wee little hack. Clearly not someone willing to actually engage in an intelligent manner, hence the refulgence of boldened and blown up words with pathetic and obtuse insults.

If I didn't know better, I'd think your the same guy who runs Haggis' account.
 
And? You've made it clear you're able to read the report, yet are only willing to admit that there was a tad bit of social media posts and maybe a wee little hack. Clearly not someone willing to actually engage in an intelligent manner, hence the refulgence of boldened and blown up words with pathetic and obtuse insults.

If I didn't know better, I'd think your the same guy who runs Haggis' account.

because that's literally all that happened. and the report, itself, states this.

it's why you're unable to cite anything contrary. and why your MO is just baseless accusations.

tl;dr - you got nothin'
 
because that's literally all that happened. and the report, itself, states this.

it's why you're unable to cite anything contrary. and why your MO is just baseless accusations.

tl;dr - you got nothin'

What happened is that the report details a systematic attack, and you willfully obfuscate and pretend as if it was just one little hack and a few twitter posts.
 
What happened is that the report details a systematic attack, and you willfully obfuscate and pretend as if it was just one little hack and a few twitter posts.

no, i said (for the umpteenth time... maybe a bigger font will help?)
i literally just referenced that. or do you believe the "systematic attack" was something much more grander than social media garbage/phishing podesta? if so, enlighten. hint: you won't. because that's all it was.
 
I don’t expect him to be able to work with the democrats.

They don’t want to work with him. They just want to get him to do what they want or score points.

I don’t expect the next democrat in the White House to be able to work with the republicans in Congress.
 
You guys decide who you want to be. And nobody gets to be Holzken... {<Scared}


 
Back
Top