Social Trump says he "can't work with democrats"

cool pic. STILL provided not one. got nothin,' eh? gee, it's like someone predicted this result. 4-5 pages ago.

The examples are in the report I have provided twice and enjoined you to simply skim, which is something you seem unable to do, save finding two instances of said meddling and being willfully obtuse.

I have made my position clear. The table of contents alone will tell you the numerous examples and methods Russia used to meddle in our election. I will not read it for you. It'll take you 30 seconds, that is, if you can indeed read, and don't have some text to speech program yelling all of this at you......
 
The examples are in the report I have provided twice and enjoined you to simply skim, which is something you seem unable to do, save finding two instances of said meddling and being willfully obtuse.

I have made my position clear. The table of contents alone will tell you the numerous examples and methods Russia used to meddle in our election. I will not read it for you. It'll take you 30 seconds, that is, if you can indeed read, and don't have some text to speech program yelling all of this at you......

hence (for the 4th time):

i literally just referenced that. or do you believe the "systematic attack" was something much more grander than social media garbage/phishing podesta? if so, enlighten. hint: you won't. because that's all it was.

you got nothin'


protip:
section II is titled II. RUSSIAN "ACTIVE MEASURES" SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN

 
Last edited:
hence (for the 4th time):



you got nothin'


protip:
section II is titled II. RUSSIAN "ACTIVE MEASURES" SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN

giphy.gif
 
Lol at the most powerful man in the world acting like a fucking child <Lmaoo>
 
The Democrat party, aka AAP[Anti-American Party] are a bunch of tossers. I'm sick of the whiny pieces of shit! All they do is moan.
They are so immature, even Pelosi, the corpse that walks and talks.
America is doing well, with their help it would be even better but they don't give a damn about the country.
They only care about potential future democrat voters, thats all.
By acting like this the whole time Trumps been in charge is going to bite them on the arse in the future. When there is a Democrat president the Republicans will act just a badly as they are doing now.

You make a post whining and moaning about other people whining and moaning.

Makes a ton of sense.
 
Russian nationals that will NEVER see the inside of a courtroom. Side note there on the Russians. Deportations at all time highs doesn’t mean squat, they’re coming right back in after you deport them. If the Dems did want their to be controlled immigration then they would would put the wall up in a blink of an eye, but they don’t because they want their voter fraud votes and to stay in power; without those faulty votes the dems wouldn’t control squat.

Excuse me! Burden of proof is when the accuser has to prove what they’re alleging about the other party.
<{Heymansnicker}>
 
Go ahead and congratulate yourself for being too lazy to read, like a true Trumper.

...first, i'm another account... now i'm a trumper?
STILL waiting for you to cite ONE... anything. let alone "dozens." but i'm the one who can't read, right? i guess that's why i cited the mueller report and you cited... oh, right. absolutely nothing. just baseless accusations and bullshit claims.
 
...first, i'm another account... now i'm a trumper?
STILL waiting for you to cite ONE... anything. let alone "dozens." but i'm the one who can't read, right? i guess that's why i cited the mueller report and you cited... oh, right. absolutely nothing. just baseless accusations and bullshit claims.

I cited the report twice. It would take you maybe 30 seconds to peruse the table of contents and look for yourself. Continue to congratulate yourself for regnant laziness.
 
I cited the report twice. It would take you maybe 30 seconds to peruse the table of contents and look for yourself. Continue to congratulate yourself for regnant laziness.

no, you linked a url from cnn twice. also, i linked the ACTUAL source from the doj. also, i actually cited it... 3 times now.

you cited nothing. see a pattern? can't just admit you were wrong... gotta evade your own claim for 5+ pages.
 
no, you linked a url from cnn twice. also, i linked the ACTUAL source from the doj. also, i actually cited it... 3 times now.

you cited nothing. see a pattern? can't just admit you were wrong... gotta evade your own claim for 5+ pages.

The CNN site that I linked, not cited (my bad), was the report itself. Nobody will read for you, and nobody is going to give you a medal for willing credulity and laziness.
 
The CNN site that I linked, not cited (my bad), was the report itself. Nobody will read for you, and nobody is going to give you a medal for willing credulity and laziness.

*ahem*


i literally just referenced that. or do you believe the "systematic attack" was something much more grander than social media garbage/phishing podesta? if so, enlighten. hint: you won't. because that's all it was.

still waiting.
 
On yourself to read? You'll be waiting until you're a dry skeleton if this thread is indicative of your attitude.

yeah, i didn't read it. it's why i quoted it. /s

still waiting. oh, right. you were just lying and you got nothin'
 
On yourself to read? You'll be waiting until you're a dry skeleton if this thread is indicative of your attitude.

yeah, i didn't read it. it's why i quoted it. /s

still waiting. oh, right. you were just lying and you got nothin'
 
Back
Top