Law Trump picks Fox News host for Defense Secretary

I have no idea if you served or not so I'll try to explain it
mutual suck, similar circumstance, and shared experience builds cohesion in military environments
trannies stick out like sore thumbs and are different by virtue of their identity and not merit, they also get out of doing male standard pt
they are unpleasant and dissonant to look at on a daily basis
they erode the culture and they lower our effectiveness

I think you're unfairly generalizing them as spokespeople because you assume too much of trump or the legacy media
at least you give them a shot though. that's SOMETHING at least

LOL @ the irony between the first and second parts of this post. Go back to the troll farm and practice up, then let us know how it goes.


Dc73js.gif
 
defend trannies in the armed forces
please

Trannies would whip your ass soy boy

Women are in the armed forces. I'm pretty sure all of sherdog would pick a tranny to beat a woman's ass too. T

They also seem to terrify Republicans, so I would think North Korea, China, or Russia would probably shit their pants if they all saw a bunch trannies coming at them.

Also, don't discount crazy factor. Who needs a drone bomb when you could just implement physiological warfare. Just send trannies, millions of trannies, into Iran to turn all their children trans because they had to look at tampons in their outhouses
 
Trannies would whip your ass soy boy

Women are in the armed forces. I'm pretty sure all of sherdog would pick a tranny to beat a woman's ass too.

They also seem to terrify Republicans, so I would think North Korea, China, or Russia would probably shit their pants if they all saw a bunch trannies coming at them.
{<jordan}
 
Left all this out conviently:
Following graduation from Princeton in 2003, Hegseth joined Bear Stearns as an equity capital markets analyst and was also commissioned as an infantry officer in the U.S. Army National Guard.[11] In 2004 his unit was called to Guantánamo Bay, where he served as an Infantry platoon leader with the Minnesota Army National Guard. His unit was under the operational control of the 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment 101st Airborne Division. He was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. Shortly after returning from Cuba, Hegseth volunteered to serve in Baghdad and Samarra, where he held the position of infantry platoon leader and, later in Samarra, as Civil–Military Operations Officer. During his time in Iraq, he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and a second Army Commendation Medal.[12]

He returned to active duty in 2012 as a captain. He deployed to Afghanistan with the Minnesota Army National Guard and acted as a senior counterinsurgency instructor at the Counterinsurgency Training Center in Kabul.
But the DailyBeast article, dude! If you can't believe the DailyBeast, who can you believe?
 
#1- He is not in the pockets of the contractors like pretty much every SOD has been. He's likely to be getting into fewer wars and military actions we are involved in will be resolved quickly with overwhelming force rather than long term grinds as we have had for decades. This means not a much of steady stream of money going to contractors.
The Trump admin is going to boost defense spending, what planet are you on where the Pentagon is going to be spending less money over the next four years?
#2- Yes, I would take a major in the army over some ass-kisser who got the CIA directorship without being qualified and then the SOD based on being the CIA director.
You could just stop being silly and admit all you care about is defending anything Trump does here. No one seriously thinks that this pick for DoD is for any other reason than the dude kisses Trump's ass. Schlesinger, for all his crony connections, was signifncalty more qualified intellectually and bureaucratically to run the CIA , let alone the Pentagon, than this clown.
 
This wasn't your argument, though. You literally titled the thread "picks fox news host" while ignoring every reason someone might argue he's a valid pick, so don't act like you created a thread for the good faith discussion of the merits and qualifications of a SOD pick. Even the post Im quoting is an obvious goal post shift.
It's pretty clear that's the guy's top qualification in Trump's eyes. There's plenty of picks who have the same views as this guy, but they aren't as visibly loyal. Not to mention the guy has next to no qualifications to run one of the most complex organizations in existence.
 
And another TDS thread where TS gets absolutely buried on the first page.

Never change Sherdog.
Can you explain to me this nominee's experience in management multibillion dollar budgets or managing organizations with hundreds of thousands of employees? You might as well be arguing that being a manager at a McDonald's makes you qualified for their C suite.
 
He's also a infantry major with actual combat experience and education from both Princeton and Harvard

In 2004 his unit was called to Guantánamo Bay, where he served as an Infantry platoon leader with the Minnesota Army National Guard

He’s a junior officer with 0 senior national security experience that secretaries need. Being boots on the ground in the national guard and in charge of 300-1000 soldiers is a small part of what the job takes. The current one was a 4 star general for gods sake
 
defend trannies in the armed forces
please
This is really easy if you think about it for a second.

All citizens of the nation have the right to apply for and serve in the military no matter their race or gender or religion. It's also in the nations interest to have as much personnel as possible, restricting stuff like this is pretty silly, especially with most branches experiencing some level of recruitment shortages.

There's plenty of tasks and roles for everyone to go around in and outside of combat. I don't think our enemies will be able to determine the gender of the person shoving a cruise missile up their ass from 1000km away. For every guy on the frontline we need ten or more in support for their logistics, management, and administration.

The nature of warfare has dramatically changed if you haven't noticed.
 
All citizens of the nation have the right to apply for and serve in the military no matter their race or gender or religion.
the military excludes those with mental disorders, and trannies have that in spades
It's also in the nations interest to have as much personnel as possible
healthy, mentally sound personnel as possible
you kow what MEPs is right?
There's plenty of tasks and roles for everyone to go around in and outside of combat. I don't think our enemies will be able to determine the gender of the person shoving a cruise missile up their ass from 1000km away.
if they had somebody misgender them that day or perform a microaggression I'd be more worried about the cruise missle going somewhere else
 
the military excludes those with mental disorders, and trannies have that in spades

healthy, mentally sound personnel as possible
you kow what MEPs is right?

if they had somebody misgender them that day or perform a microaggression I'd be more worried about the cruise missle going somewhere else
Everyone in America is a sociopath, doesn't seem like letting trans in is really a stretch at this point
 
And another TDS thread where TS gets absolutely buried on the first page.

Never change Sherdog.
I've been on here a long time and I've never seen a poster create so many threads that backfired on them.
 
The most powerful military in the world couldn't beat a bunch of poor farmers in the 60's its not like it is some unstoppable force. Getting comfortable with being the richest country in the world could lead to some major problems if and when it comes to fighting a tactically superior nation.
- Don't forget the fishermans and the Afgans, bro. But they're all tough guys to be fair.
 
Back
Top