It's perfectly valid to say a guy without the senior-level experience needed for the job is a bad pick. You nincompoops have offered no reasons why this overtly political pick of a profoundly unqualified person was actually a good choice.
He is not the first, nor the last you could say that about.
They had the advantage of being able to learn as their companies grew. That ain't the DoD, it's already grown. There was also a lot of handholding for both as they learned their jobs. Again, not what we want from this position.
No I asked which SODs were less qualified. This also just basic civic knowledge.
Who was the last sod with no experience managing high level federal portfolios or big departments and orgs?
See the issue you are having is you define every role a previous SOD had in the government as some sore of huge role when most of them are just positions given for kissing ass and your underlings do all the actual work. I would say a Major in the army is more than qualified to run the DOD in most cases. It's like anything else in the government it's who you know, not what you know, that's what most of these SOD have in common. Almost none of them were probably the best person for the job.
Defense spending is going to go up, you think contractors are hurting lol. And who are these defense industry people hating?
More qualified than director of the CIA or assistant SOD? Lol
TS wants these type of people in charge of America's national security.
Ahh, I must have missed this when it was first posted. You guys made it to post #12 before you started whining about trannies this time haha.TS wants these type of people in charge of America's national security.
man, you can sense the low energy in this post.
That's because 100% of them are mentally ill and leftists treat them like some brave heroes.
You are completely fucking dense, that's becoming clear.
curious why he will likely be "getting into fewer wars"?
