• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Trump may fire Mueller next week

Kind of a difficult argument regarding scope. Remember whitewater leading to Lewinsky by chance? Mueller is a republican for Christ's sake, Starr was a well known conservative.

Also if Trump has nothing to hide why is he and his state run media channel Fox News trying to hard to discredit the players in the investigation?
 
Sounds like he's finding illegal activity. Who wouldn't want people who broke the law brought to justice?

Um, that's not the way things work. You don't invesrigate someone to see if they committed a crime. You investigate the crime and see who is responsible. This is harassment and witch hunting at this point.

Mueller should go.
 
Um, that's not the way things work. You don't invesrigate someone to see if they committed a crime. You investigate the crime and see who is responsible. This is harassment and witch hunting at this point.

Mueller should go.

lol... Imagine walking around through life being this uninformed. Please explain why Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein said LAST WEEK under oath that he sees no reason why Mueller should be fired. Admit you are watching and spreading fake news propaganda
 
Um, that's not the way things work. You don't invesrigate someone to see if they committed a crime. You investigate the crime and see who is responsible. This is harassment and witch hunting at this point.

Mueller should go.
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
 
Kind of a difficult argument regarding scope. Remember whitewater leading to Lewinsky by chance? Mueller is a republican for Christ's sake, Starr was a well known conservative.

Not sure what that has to do with anything. Dems have cried foul ever since that happened. But now they support it? Interesting.
 
Um, that's not the way things work. You don't invesrigate someone to see if they committed a crime. You investigate the crime and see who is responsible. This is harassment and witch hunting at this point.

Mueller should go.

That's not how things work at all.

"Sarge, we're getting complaints this man may be involved in illegal activity."

"Do we know what crimes he committed?"

"No, sir."

"Well, then we can't look into his activities. Thanks to television, the public has a terrible understanding of what investigations are."
 
That's not how things work at all.

"Sarge, we're getting complaints this man may be involved in illegal activity."

"Do we know what crimes he committed?"

"No, sir."

"Well, then we can't look into his activities. Thanks to television, the public has a terrible understanding of what investigations are."

"Hey judge...we have reason to believe this man has committed a crime and would like to secure a warrent"

"Ok. What crime do you think this man has committed?"

"I dunno"

"So you want a warrant to violate a person's privacy and freedom but don't even know what crime you are investigating? Ok. Well, what evidence do you have that there has been a crime committed?"

"....a discredited dossier that was bought and paid for by his political opponents..."

"Get out of my courtroom"
 
Mark Dice had a good rebuttal to this shill



All the best journalism and political insight comes from YouTube videos with juvenile text all over them.

I used to think otherwise, but I've since come to realize that the people who know the most about the legal process are actually people slumped over keyboards as they jockey for likes from their echo chambers while the people who know the least about the law are the people who dedicated their lives to either working in law or reporting on the law.

What a fool I was....
 
"Hey judge...we have reason to believe this man has committed a crime and would like to secure a warrent"

"Ok. What crime do you think this man has committed?"

"I dunno"

"So you want a warrant to violate a person's privacy and freedom but don't even know what crime you are investigating? Ok. Well, what evidence do you have that there has been a crime committed?"

"....a discredited dossier that was bought and paid for by his political opponents..."

"Get out of my courtroom"

Meanwhile in reality....
 
"So you want a warrant to violate a person's privacy and freedom but don't even know what crime you are investigating? Ok. Well, what evidence do you have that there has been a crime committed?"

"....a discredited dossier that was bought and paid for by his political opponents..."

"Get out of my courtroom"

If the evidence was illegally obtained then it will be thrown out of court.

So why are Trumpites so scared i wonder?
 
All the best journalism and political insight comes from YouTube videos with juvenile text all over them.

I used to think otherwise, but I've since come to realize that the people who know the most about the legal process are actually people slumped over keyboards as they jockey for likes from their echo chambers while the people who know the least about the law are the people who dedicated their lives to either working in law or reporting on the law.

What a fool I was....

And of course you won't address any of the points made in the video, which is mostly made by people in congress.

"I just can't take any journalism seriously where juvenile titles are used. I stick to the professionals like the fine people at CNN, who tell me about Donald Trump's Diet Coke habits, and dog whistle crazies by presenting stories about 'Designated Survivor' situations that would put Obama's people back in charge."
 
If the evidence was illegally obtained then it will be thrown out of court.

So why are Trumpites so scared i wonder?

Again, you need to identify the crime that was a committed or the statute that was violated. To just endlessly investigate people, dig through their private life, dig through the lives of everyone around them, and then selectively leak information to the media to cause hysteria and shape public perception is a total violation of person's liberty and the publics trust.

But you know that.
 
Again, you need to identify the crime that was a committed or the statute that was violated. To just endlessly investigate people, dig through their private life, dig through the lives of everyone around them, and then selectively leak information to the media to cause hysteria and shape public perception is a total violation of person's liberty and the publics trust.

But you know that.

Of course i know that and Mueller knows that.

If Mueller is doing that then it will be thrown out of court and the judge who gave the warrants will be disbarred.

But in reality, its quite likely that they went against Flynn to have him sing and point out towards the evidence. But that's mere speculation, we dont know what Mueller has or hasn't.

What we know is that the justice system has its checks and balances. You Trump supporters are the ones who are most afraid of this.

Is almost as if you believe Trump is guilty of something, but that he shouldnt be investigated for a reason.
 
Of course i know that and Mueller knows that.

If Mueller is doing that then it will be thrown out of court and the judge who gave the warrants will be disbarred.

But in reality, its quite likely that they went against Flynn to have him sing and point out towards the evidence. But that's mere speculation, we dont know what Mueller has or hasn't.

What we know is that the justice system has its checks and balances. You Trump supporters are the ones who are most afraid of this.

Is almost as if you believe Trump is guilty of something, but that he shouldnt be investigated for a reason.

Of course the concern is not that Trump is actually guilty of something and will be convicted of a crime. We all know thats not going to happen. The concern is that his political opponents and deep state enemies will use this out of control investigation to smear him with lies and fake news in hopes of provoking an impeachment.
 
"Hey judge...we have reason to believe this man has committed a crime and would like to secure a warrent"


"Ok. What crime do you think this man has committed?"


"I dunno, but he's associated closely with known criminals, is constantly defending himself in court and has done everything possible to avoid legal scrutiny. Everything he does looks guilty on the surface and their are persistent rumors of money laundering."


"So you want a warrant to violate a person's privacy and freedom but don't even know what crime you are investigating? Ok. Well, what evidence do you have that there has been a crime committed?"


"He seemingly has great wealth despite a life time of bankruptcies. He personally is working with Russian criminals and people who are known money launderers. This dossier, funded by his own Republican allies and utilizing a trusted intelligence source, suggests he and the top people in his campaign were compromised by Russian intelligence. We've had one of his employees under surveillance for awhile now and it sounds like illegal activities with the Russians includes several top people in his organization. This man also seems to confess to possibly illegal things every time he tweets. He continually makes statements in the media that suggest some of what we suspect is true. He and his entire staff lie about this constantly, even the people who have been in the swamp forever and know the consequences of lying."


"It sounds like he hires the best people.
Get out of my courtroom and get on this case right now. But we have to do this by the book, because he's a very powerful man and everything we do will be closely scrutinized. Put Mueller on the case. You would have to be a complete fucking moron to distrust Mueller's incredible record of professional service. And he's a Republican, so... literally... only the most brain-damaged fucktard could be whipped into opposition to him.


Fixed.
 

"I'm not going to tell you again...get out of my courtroom with this speculative nonsense. Come back when you have some credible evidence that points to an actual crime"
 
Not sure what that has to do with anything. Dems have cried foul ever since that happened. But now they support it? Interesting.
It was just some perspective and precedent. And it's totally relevant because your argument is that Mueller is a left wing shill thus this is nothing but a witch-hunt.

People whine about shit all the time. Whitewater led to Lewinsky, now it's the right wing turn to cry.

Trump isn't going to fire Mueller.
 
Of course the concern is not that Trump is actually guilty of something and will be convicted of a crime. We all know thats not going to happen. The concern is that his political opponents and deep state enemies will use this out of control investigation to smear him with lies and fake news in hopes of provoking an impeachment.
giphy.gif
 
Back
Top