Elections Trump for POTUS mega thread

[DoctorTaco]

He can say he's joking all he wants. Holding your rally in the middle of the day with no shade when it's like 100 degrees out already proves that he doesn't give a shit about his cultists.

Trump jokes about heat at Las Vegas rally; 6 people hospitalized after attending

I spend time in Vegas now and again for work. That heat is no fuckin joke. I’m young(ish) and healthy and it’s almost knocked my dick in the dirt after spending too much time in the heat drinking water and not taking electrolytes into consideration.

trump’s Believers? They’re asking for trouble given the general size and shape of most of them….

 

[cottagecheesefan]

you don't think he should pick his words better?

In which clip are you referencing? And if put into context of his speech, and not just a snippet, does his point not make sense?

 

[idrankyourbeer]

I spend time in Vegas now and again for work. That heat is no fuckin joke. I’m young(ish) and healthy and it’s almost knocked my dick in the dirt after spending too much time in the heat drinking water and not taking electrolytes into consideration.

trump’s Believers? They’re asking for trouble given the general size and shape of most of them….

they may be 400 pounds and sweating out gravy but they are still no match against a las vegas tiger shark.

the reflection coming from their golden diapers will attract all of the sharks along the nevada coastline to come in for a feeding frenzy.

 

[PBAC]

In which clip are you referencing? And if put into context of his speech, and not just a snippet, does his point not make sense?

in the shark one I can see his point. So I can concede there's method there. It's still long winded and rambling. He was dog whitling to his followers about how sharks are migrants. The Hannibal one, no, that's worse. point is anyway, I can hear Biden speak more eloquently in his longer speeches than Trump in his shorter speeches. The Biden gaffs are less notable in longer sessions but more notable when the moment is removed shortened and given a prompt.

 

[DoctorTaco]

But don’t see anything wrong with the shark thing

Nothing wrong with this?!

“…I say what would happen if the boat sank from its weight and you’re in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery and the battery is now underwater and there’s a shark that’s approximately 10 yards over there. By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately. You notice that? A lot of shark. I watched some guys justifying it today. Well, they weren’t really that angry. They bit off the young ladies leg because of the fact that they were, they were not hungry, but they misunderstood what, who she was. These people are cray. He said there’s no problem with sharks they just didn’t really understand a young woman swimming. Now really got decimated and other people too. A lot of shark attacks. So I said, so there’s a shark 10 yards away from the boat. 10 yards over here. Do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking, water goes over the battery, the boat is sinking. Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted because, I will tell you, he didnt know the answer. He said, you know, nobody’s ever asked that question. I said, I think it’s a good question. I think there’s a lot of electric current coming through that water, but you know what I’d do if there was a shark or you get electrocuted? I’ll take electrocution every single time. I’m not getting near the shark.”

When a sane person would of just said:

Spoiler

I don’t trust electric powered boats. If they sink you’re at risk of electrocution. Sure you could create some distance from the sinking boat but what about sharks? I’ve always been afraid of sharks.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

in the shark one I can see his point. So I can concede there's method there. It's still long winded and rambling. He was dog whitling to his followers about how sharks are migrants. The Hannibal one, no, that's worse. point is anyway, I can hear Biden speak more eloquently in his longer speeches than Trump in his shorter speeches. The Biden gaffs are less notable in longer sessions but more notable when the moment is removed shortened and given a prompt.

What is wrong with the Hannibal joke?

And can you post a link of Biden giving an eloquent speech that lasts more than 30 seconds and doesn’t go into him rambling about cannibals eating his uncle, lying about being arrested with Rosa parks, etc?

New York Times even had an article today or yesterday about how much Biden lies lol.

 

[PBAC]

What is wrong with the Hannibal joke?

And can you post a link of Biden giving an eloquent speech that lasts more than 30 seconds and doesn’t go into him rambling about cannibals eating his uncle, lying about being arrested with Rosa parks, etc?

New York Times even had an article today or yesterday about how much Biden lies lol.

asking chatgpt if this person the person is speaking cogerently:

The excerpt you provided contains several indicators of incoherence and misunderstanding. Let’s break it down to identify specific issues:

1. Misinterpretation of Hannibal Lecter:
   • The character Hannibal Lecter is not someone who would typically be described as “wonderful” in a positive sense. He is a notorious fictional serial killer and cannibal.
   • Referring to Hannibal Lecter as "the late, great" seems odd since Lecter is a fictional character and therefore not someone who can die or be lauded as "great" in the usual way.
2. Repetition and Confusion:
   • The speaker repeats the phrase “I’m about to have a friend for dinner” multiple times. While this phrase is a play on words related to Lecter’s cannibalism, repeating it without adding new information or context can confuse listeners.
   • The phrase is used in a context that seems to mix admiration with the character’s macabre actions, leading to confusion about the speaker's intended message.
3. Disjointed Thoughts:
   • The statement jumps between ideas without clear connections. The speaker moves from mentioning "The Silence of the Lambs" to calling Hannibal Lecter wonderful, then to repeating a movie line, and finally back to congratulating Lecter.
   • This lack of clear transitions can make it hard for listeners to follow the speaker's train of thought.
4. Mixing Reality and Fiction:
   • The speaker treats Hannibal Lecter almost as a real person (“the late, great Hannibal Lecter”), which blurs the line between fiction and reality, leading to potential confusion.
   • This is problematic in coherent speech, where it’s important to keep distinctions clear, especially when referencing well-known fictional works and characters.

In summary, the speaker’s statements are not fully coherent due to the misinterpretation of character traits, the repetition of a phrase without clear purpose, disjointed transitions between topics, and the mixing of fictional and real-world contexts. To be coherent, the speaker would need to clarify their admiration (if any) for the character in a more structured manner and maintain a clear distinction between the narrative of the movie and real life.

 

[PBAC]

what would you think if this person was on stage speaking at a political rally?


If someone were delivering this speech at a political rally, several concerns would arise regarding their coherence, messaging, and overall appropriateness for the context. Here’s a detailed analysis:

Concerns and Impressions:​

1. Coherence and Clarity:
   • Perceived Incoherence: The speech contains disjointed thoughts and a lack of clear direction. This might lead the audience to perceive the speaker as incoherent or unfocused.
   • Confusion: Repeating a line from a fictional character without clear context can confuse the audience about the speaker’s point or message. Audiences at political rallies typically expect clear, direct communication about policies or values, not obscure references.
2. Appropriateness:
   • Questionable Character Reference: Referring to Hannibal Lecter, a fictional cannibalistic serial killer, in a political speech is unusual and may seem inappropriate. It might lead the audience to question the speaker’s judgment or the relevance of such a reference to political matters.
   • Mixing Reality and Fiction: Treating a fictional character as if they were real (“the late, great Hannibal Lecter”) could be perceived as strange or out of touch, further undermining the speaker’s credibility.
3. Messaging and Audience Reception:
   • Misleading Admiration: Calling Hannibal Lecter “wonderful” and “great” could be alarming or off-putting, especially since he’s known for his violent and malevolent actions. This might lead the audience to misinterpret the speaker’s values or intentions.
   • Inappropriate Humor: If the speaker intended to use humor or irony, it was not clearly conveyed, making the reference potentially unsettling rather than amusing.
4. Emotional and Psychological Impact:
   • Discomfort and Distrust: The mention of a character known for gruesome deeds at a political rally can create discomfort and could make the audience distrust the speaker’s judgment or sensitivity to the rally’s context.
   • Lack of Connection: The audience might struggle to see the relevance of discussing a fictional cannibal at a political event, which could alienate them or cause them to disengage.

Potential Audience Reactions:​

1. Confusion: Many in the audience might be puzzled about the relevance of discussing a movie character like Hannibal Lecter in a political setting.
2. Discomfort or Alarm: Some audience members could feel uncomfortable or alarmed by the glorification of a notorious fictional villain, especially if they don’t perceive it as a joke or satire.
3. Distraction: Instead of focusing on the political issues at hand, the audience might become preoccupied with trying to understand the reference or the speaker's intent, detracting from the rally’s objectives.
4. Judgment on Credibility: The speaker’s credibility could be questioned, as the use of such a bizarre and inappropriate reference might be seen as a lapse in judgment or an indication of an unfocused or erratic mind.

Impact on the Speaker’s Image:​

1. Perceived as Out of Touch: The speaker might be seen as out of touch with the audience’s expectations and the serious nature of political discourse.
2. Potential for Ridicule: There is a risk that the speech could be mocked or ridiculed, both by political opponents and the media, for its bizarre and inappropriate content.
3. Erosion of Trust: Trust in the speaker’s ability to handle important issues could be eroded if the audience perceives the reference as indicative of poor judgment or a lack of seriousness.

Conclusion:​

At a political rally, it’s crucial for speakers to communicate clearly, stay relevant to the audience’s concerns, and maintain an appropriate tone. The reference to “The Silence of the Lambs” and Hannibal Lecter in the provided speech deviates significantly from these expectations. It introduces confusion, discomfort, and a potential disconnect with the audience, ultimately detracting from the effectiveness of the speech and the speaker’s credibility.

 

[jk7707]

I spend time in Vegas now and again for work. That heat is no fuckin joke. I’m young(ish) and healthy and it’s almost knocked my dick in the dirt after spending too much time in the heat drinking water and not taking electrolytes into consideration.

trump’s Believers? They’re asking for trouble given the general size and shape of most of them….

I'm sure there are plenty of venues in Las Vegas of all places to book, that have AC. They're just being cheap, because they know the die hard cultists will show up anyway. Trump doesn't give a shit if they drop dead.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

what would you think if this person was on stage speaking at a political rally?


If someone were delivering this speech at a political rally, several concerns would arise regarding their coherence, messaging, and overall appropriateness for the context. Here’s a detailed analysis:

Concerns and Impressions:​

1. Coherence and Clarity:
   • Perceived Incoherence: The speech contains disjointed thoughts and a lack of clear direction. This might lead the audience to perceive the speaker as incoherent or unfocused.
   • Confusion: Repeating a line from a fictional character without clear context can confuse the audience about the speaker’s point or message. Audiences at political rallies typically expect clear, direct communication about policies or values, not obscure references.
2. Appropriateness:
   • Questionable Character Reference: Referring to Hannibal Lecter, a fictional cannibalistic serial killer, in a political speech is unusual and may seem inappropriate. It might lead the audience to question the speaker’s judgment or the relevance of such a reference to political matters.
   • Mixing Reality and Fiction: Treating a fictional character as if they were real (“the late, great Hannibal Lecter”) could be perceived as strange or out of touch, further undermining the speaker’s credibility.
3. Messaging and Audience Reception:
   • Misleading Admiration: Calling Hannibal Lecter “wonderful” and “great” could be alarming or off-putting, especially since he’s known for his violent and malevolent actions. This might lead the audience to misinterpret the speaker’s values or intentions.
   • Inappropriate Humor: If the speaker intended to use humor or irony, it was not clearly conveyed, making the reference potentially unsettling rather than amusing.
4. Emotional and Psychological Impact:
   • Discomfort and Distrust: The mention of a character known for gruesome deeds at a political rally can create discomfort and could make the audience distrust the speaker’s judgment or sensitivity to the rally’s context.
   • Lack of Connection: The audience might struggle to see the relevance of discussing a fictional cannibal at a political event, which could alienate them or cause them to disengage.

Potential Audience Reactions:​

1. Confusion: Many in the audience might be puzzled about the relevance of discussing a movie character like Hannibal Lecter in a political setting.
2. Discomfort or Alarm: Some audience members could feel uncomfortable or alarmed by the glorification of a notorious fictional villain, especially if they don’t perceive it as a joke or satire.
3. Distraction: Instead of focusing on the political issues at hand, the audience might become preoccupied with trying to understand the reference or the speaker's intent, detracting from the rally’s objectives.
4. Judgment on Credibility: The speaker’s credibility could be questioned, as the use of such a bizarre and inappropriate reference might be seen as a lapse in judgment or an indication of an unfocused or erratic mind.

Impact on the Speaker’s Image:​

1. Perceived as Out of Touch: The speaker might be seen as out of touch with the audience’s expectations and the serious nature of political discourse.
2. Potential for Ridicule: There is a risk that the speech could be mocked or ridiculed, both by political opponents and the media, for its bizarre and inappropriate content.
3. Erosion of Trust: Trust in the speaker’s ability to handle important issues could be eroded if the audience perceives the reference as indicative of poor judgment or a lack of seriousness.

Conclusion:​

At a political rally, it’s crucial for speakers to communicate clearly, stay relevant to the audience’s concerns, and maintain an appropriate tone. The reference to “The Silence of the Lambs” and Hannibal Lecter in the provided speech deviates significantly from these expectations. It introduces confusion, discomfort, and a potential disconnect with the audience, ultimately detracting from the effectiveness of the speech and the speaker’s credibility.

Basically you can’t form an argument or opinion of your own and make two posts of AI word salad? Got it, lmao!

 

[PBAC]

Basically you can’t form an argument or opinion of your own? Got it, lmao!

If I make an argument about it from my own perspective you can just say my perspective is wrong. The robot creates a middle ground perspective. That's all. It highlights the idea that the speeches may not be entirely legible is not just a bias.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

If I make an argument about it from my own perspective you can just say my perspective is wrong. The robot creates a middle ground perspective. That's all.

This post literally makes no sense. I already did say your perspective is wrong, and you’re just deflecti by to an AI word salad.

 

[emefer]

Nothing wrong with this?!

“…I say what would happen if the boat sank from its weight and you’re in the boat and you have this tremendously powerful battery and the battery is now underwater and there’s a shark that’s approximately 10 yards over there. By the way, a lot of shark attacks lately. You notice that? A lot of shark. I watched some guys justifying it today. Well, they weren’t really that angry. They bit off the young ladies leg because of the fact that they were, they were not hungry, but they misunderstood what, who she was. These people are cray. He said there’s no problem with sharks they just didn’t really understand a young woman swimming. Now really got decimated and other people too. A lot of shark attacks. So I said, so there’s a shark 10 yards away from the boat. 10 yards over here. Do I get electrocuted if the boat is sinking, water goes over the battery, the boat is sinking. Do I stay on top of the boat and get electrocuted or do I jump over by the shark and not get electrocuted because, I will tell you, he didnt know the answer. He said, you know, nobody’s ever asked that question. I said, I think it’s a good question. I think there’s a lot of electric current coming through that water, but you know what I’d do if there was a shark or you get electrocuted? I’ll take electrocution every single time. I’m not getting near the shark.”

When a sane person would of just said:

Spoiler

I don’t trust electric powered boats. If they sink you’re at risk of electrocution. Sure you could create some distance from the sinking boat but what about sharks? I’ve always been afraid of sharks.

Is he saying the weight of the battery is going to sink the boat?
lol

 

[PBAC]

This post literally makes no sense. I already did say your perspective is wrong, and you’re just deflecti by to an AI word salad.

ok then is the AI's perspective wrong? You can understand the points it makes and how others might notice these too?

 

[cottagecheesefan]

ok then is the AI's perspective wrong? You can understand the points it makes?

Yes, because if you look at the AI reasoning, it’s all about may be taken the wrong way, might make people uncomfortable, etc.

Yes, only idiots without a sense of humour. AI giving a word salad that basically comes out to, “the left can’t meme”. Uhh, yea, no shit

 

[emefer]

Yes, because if you look at the AI reasoning, it’s all about may be taken the wrong way, might make people uncomfortable, etc.

Yes, only idiots without a sense of humour

I think the AI makes better points than you ever have

 

[emefer]

Here is an even longer version, where it includes him going on to joke about Joe

Really don’t see how him speaking the truth for once by saying he doesn’t care about people other than their vote and then following by saying the media will run with it makes it a joke.

 

[Sinister]

Trump: "And the electric boats, the batteries are too heavy!! They won't float!!"

Boats:



Trump: "It was a shark attack, well the shark was angry but not really hungry, but it just bit off a young women's leg. It wasnt hungry it was just confused about who she was!!"

Shark: "Oh wait a minute, you're NOT Christina Johnson?? Oh dear I'm so sorry Ma'am! Wow this is so embarrassing. I mistook you for someone else!!"

Republicans: "Joe Biden is confused, doesnt know where he is!! He waves to people who arent there!!"

Reality:

Donald Trump Ridiculed for Waving to 'Nobody' Again as He Boards His Private Plane: 'It's All a Scam'​

"Donald Trump was mocked for acting like he was interacting with his supporters when he really wasn't.
While boarding his private plane, the ex-president, 77, was seen waving to people on the tarmac, though there didn't seem to be anyone around him.
Trump critic Ron Filipkowski captioned the video clip, posted to X, formerly known as Twitter, writing: "He’s waving to nobody. His campaign staffer filming this is who he points to. That’s it. It’s all a scam, staged, and fake."

Caught on camera multiple times waving at ghosts.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

In which clip are you referencing? And if put into context of his speech, and not just a snippet, does his point not make sense?

Let’s see Biden give an hour plus speech in 100plus degree weather while wearing a suit.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

Trump: "And the electric boats, the batteries are too heavy!! They won't float!!"

Boats:



Trump: "It was a shark attack, well the shark was angry but not really hungry, but it just bit off a young women's leg. It wasnt hungry it was just confused about who she was!!"

Shark: "Oh wait a minute, you're NOT Christina Johnson?? Oh dear I'm so sorry Ma'am! Wow this is so embarrassing. I mistook you for someone else!!"

Republicans: "Joe Biden is confused, doesnt know where he is!! He waves to people who arent there!!"

Reality:


toggle

• REALITY TV
• NEWS
• STYLE
• ROYALS
• PHOTOS
• VIDEOS
• TRUE CRIME
• THE CHECKOUT
• SUBSCRIBE

Sign in with OpenPass

BREAKING NEWS
Halsey's Health Scare: Singer Is 'Lucky to Be Alive' as She Sings About Struggles in New Song
Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez Divorce Imminent as They Try to Sell Marital Home

Home > News > Donald Trump

NEWS

Donald Trump Ridiculed for Waving to 'Nobody' Again as He Boards His Private Plane: 'It's All a Scam'​

SOURCE: MEGA
By:Jaclyn Roth
Jun. 10 2024, Published 11:42 a.m. ET

Comments

"Donald Trump was mocked for acting like he was interacting with his supporters when he really wasn't.
While boarding his private plane, the ex-president, 77, was seen waving to people on the tarmac, though there didn't seem to be anyone around him.
Trump critic Ron Filipkowski captioned the video clip, posted to X, formerly known as Twitter, writing: "He’s waving to nobody. His campaign staffer filming this is who he points to. That’s it. It’s all a scam, staged, and fake."

Caught on camera multiple times waving at ghosts.

Imagine posting this wall of whatever, and not admitting you’re psychotic