Crime Trump flouts pardons for CBP chief

[Jack V Savage]

Well I didnt vote for him and he won so I'm not sure how my calling bs on what has turned out to be bs has any bearing on his reelection.

Although I'm fairly confident that between post birth abortion, trans athletes, reparations, and the continued calls to find collusion that isnt to be found will help him greatly in 2020.

Yes, yes. This is transparent bullshit. "I have to vote for a corrupt, authoritarian moron because the liberals force me. Us Republicans have no free will."

 

[PainIsLIfe]

Talk about cowardice, defend nearly all he does with enough shame left over to allow yourself to pretend not to support the embarrassment to humanity that he is.

Ive called him out for stupid things he's said, for lack of morals, for being uninformed, for lying, for flip-flopping, for policy stances, and I didnt vote in 2016.

Id say its more cowardly to make up lies and to support unfounded bs simply to drum up support for your party. But thats just mho.

 

[andnowweknow]

So, you don't care if the president directly tells government employees to break the law, and speaks of pardons for breaking the law?

Why would that bother me? The guy wants to build a wall that will never get built. He means well despite being a demonstrably shit human being, all politics aside.

The amount you have to ignore is incredible in order to support Trump...it's almost if you don't blindly support him, you'd die of shame having to judge him on a case by case basis.

 

[andnowweknow]

Id say its more cowardly to make up lies and to support unfounded bs simply to drum up support for your party. But thats just mho.

All partisanship aside, you do realize Trump is the most prolific liar by orders of magnitude in documented human history, right?

 

[PainIsLIfe]

Yes, yes. This is transparent bullshit. "I have to vote for a corrupt, authoritarian moron because the liberals force me. Us Republicans have no free will."

Jack, is your reading comprehension failing you again? Ive not voted for him yet, but we all see the dems pushing post birth abortion. We see the left pushing for reparations. We all watched every democrat in the house vote to force girls to compete against biological males. And we see the unhinged left still calling for impeachment for collusion.

Are you so blinded by party loyalty that you dont believe casual independents see it as well?

 

[PainIsLIfe]

All partisanship aside, you do realize Trump is the most prolific liar by orders of magnitude in documented human history, right?

Yes i do. Ate you claiming that gives dems immunity to lie because of it?

 

[andnowweknow]

Yes i do. Ate you claiming that gives dems immunity to lie because of it?

No, I'm not. Democrats are irritating on many levels, though it's the far left that really bothers me and not moderate dems who I generally like. It just seems ridiculous to say what you said in the face of Trump's behavior on basic things...like literally lying about everything.

 

[ocfightfan]

The system is rigged to prevent enforcement of a sane immigration policy. The establishment and in particular these activist judges have manufactured all manner of emanations and penumbras to handcuff any administration that wants to try and slow down the tsunami of illegals.

 

[ultramanhyata]

Starts with

Now we don’t know if this is true


I stopped there, fucking hack

Yeah... You wouldn't want to take a position and then have to retract it when/if a source appears. Very weak. Very. Weak.

 

[ultramanhyata]

The establishment and in particular these activist judges have manufactured all manner of emanations and penumbras to handcuff any administration that wants to try and slow down the tsunami of illegals.

Yeah. This is why Obama was able to deport migrants in record number.

Also... Do you realize we're currently at a net outflow of illegals? More are returning to Mexico than coming into the US.

 

[andnowweknow]

Also... Do you realize we're currently at a net outflow of illegals? More are returning to Mexico than coming into the US.

Do you realize if this is taken at face value and accepted as true (of course it is true), there really isn't anything left for Trumpers to support him on...other than his personal behavior and legal problems...which let's be honest, is gonna start feeling gross at some point on it's own.

Thus, Trumpers will ignore your highlighted point above and pretend it's the greatest issue humanity faces...not to mention ths darkest (well, brownest).

 

[Darkballs]

On the illegal immigration question, the law is surprisingly unclear. The current level of arrivals arguably amount to an invasion, and local efforts to thwart enforcement arguably amount to insurrection. The President can act unilaterally to repel invasion or put down insurrection, even though liberal open borders advocates would vehemently argue that these matters are strictly a matter of domestic policy.

This is, without a doubt, the dumbest legal opinion ever offered in the history of the War Room.

A record number of immigrants are requesting asylum, and you are saying that this is an insurrection which allows for the suspension of our laws?

Just say you want a dictator. Don't make the worlds shittiest legal argument first.

 

[hillelslovak87]

This is, without a doubt, the dumbest legal opinion ever offered in the history of the War Room.

A record number of immigrants are requesting asylum, and you are saying that this is an insurrection which allows for the suspension of our laws?

Just say you want a dictator. Don't make the worlds shittiest legal argument first.

I find it absurd, funny and sad that people like Russler are literally parroting the same shit that the know nothings were speaking of in the 1890s about the Irish.

 

[Limbo Pete]

This is, without a doubt, the dumbest legal opinion ever offered in the history of the War Room.

A record number of immigrants are requesting asylum, and you are saying that this is an insurrection which allows for the suspension of our laws?

Just say you want a dictator. Don't make the worlds shittiest legal argument first.

It's totally transparent
Reclassify someone or something to make killing them rhetorically justifiable

 

[Darkballs]

It's totally transparent
Reclassify someone or something to make killing them rhetorically justifiable

But not just that. It's a completely bullshit legal argument.

SCOTUS has held that an act levied by Congress authorizing the President to mobilize a militia in order to put down an armed insurrection, was constitutional.

To stretch that and suggest that our situation of the border would fit that description is beyond disingenuous. It's just plain stupid.

I'd imagine he's just regurgitating what he heard by some right wing talking head, and hasn't bothered to even think it through.

 

[Limbo Pete]

But not just that. It's a completely bullshit legal argument.

SCOTUS has held that an act levied by Congress authorizing the President to mobilize a militia in order to put down an armed insurrection, was constitutional.

To stretch that and suggest that our situation of the border would fit that description is beyond disingenuous. It's just plain stupid.

I'd imagine he's just regurgitating what he heard by some right wing talking head, and hasn't bothered to even think it through.

He's the Lionel Hutz of Sherdog lawyers

 

[godking]

Obama didn't have to promise it. It was common knowledge he wouldn't let anyone on his team get nailed for their numerous crimes (or his.)

Every president uses pardons for political motives (Ironically people complained that Obama did'nt use his ability to pardon people enough) .

But you don't use it blatantly and openly like Trump does.

 

[JamesRussler]

This is, without a doubt, the dumbest legal opinion ever offered in the history of the War Room.

A record number of immigrants are requesting asylum, and you are saying that this is an insurrection which allows for the suspension of our laws?

Just say you want a dictator. Don't make the worlds shittiest legal argument first.

I’m right, you’re wrong. Keep crying you Tier 4 dropout.

 

[Darkballs]

I’m right, you’re wrong. Keep crying you Tier 4 dropout.

Then go ahead and post your citations boy.

 

[JamesRussler]

Then go ahead and post your citations boy.

President’s Power in the Field of Foreign Relations (DOJ memo): https://www.justice.gov/file/20661/download

Militia Acts: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_Acts_of_1792

Posse Comitatus Act: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1385

Insurrection Act: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act

National Emergencies Act: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Emergencies_Act

War Powers Resolution: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution

Long story short, everything I wrote is 100% accurate. If it’s an invasion, insurrection, or rebellion, POTUS can act unilaterally to nip it using the military. As a liberal cuck, you would argue that it’s all a matter of domestic policy, and that POTUS and his agents are in criminal violation of Posse Comitatus Act. If a liberal activist Judge happens to agree with you, a Presidential pardon is in order.

You’re such a low-IQ troll. You still wanna bet that Jim Comey doesn’t get prosecuted? I own your soul, you T4 waitlister.