Citing the travel ban as support for the president having the power to suspend all congressional authority on the grounds that asylum seekers amount to an armed insurrection.
Bravo. Submit this to your law review and let us know when you're published.
Your point is beyond stupid. You are saying that because the courts upheld that congress could delegate it's authority to raise a militia for the purposes of, among other things, armed insurrection; does not mean the president can unilaterally and unquestionably declare anything and everything an "armed insurrection," is in complete contradiction to all Court precedent.
You're reasoning is idiotic, and you show no citations other than a ruling on a travel ban.
You are a failure at this.
