Trump crying about Stephen Curry... lol

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Evolution can explain that, and the answer is the chicken came first.

HURR HURR WHICH CAME FIRST, THE CHIKUN OR THE EG? CHECKMATE SCIENCE.

No dumbasses, it was the egg.

Ruh roh

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Well, good luck claiming your International Prize for Biology. I'm sure your dissertation will be a little more than "Muh god says you're wrong".

I don't care about disproving evolution really. The only reason we're discussing it at all is because somebody is setting out to disprove the Bible. Explain how what I saod is wrong. The founder of the theory himself admitted it

 

[Falsedawn]

Ruh roh

He's mistaken, the egg came first.

He's in the same book though, you're coloring in crayon. Muh gooooooooooood.

 

[Falsedawn]

The founder of the theory himself admitted it

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

He's mistaken, the egg came first.

He's in the same book though, you're coloring in crayon. Muh gooooooooooood.

Typical arrogant attitude. Sounds similar to you before the election. You were so sure yet so wrong.

The lamans explanation for this dilemma is a bird (not a chicken) laid a chicken egg. Can you elaborate or is it as ridiculous as it sounds?

 

[Falsedawn]

Typical arrogant attitude. Sounds similar to you before the election. You were so sure yet so wrong.

The lamans explanation for this dilemma is a bird (not a chicken) laid a chicken egg. Can you elaborate or is it as ridiculous as it sounds?

Dude, i'm not going to go over the basics of speciation with the biology equivalent of a toddler. Yes, that's arrogance, because you believe dumb shit in lieu of checking into one of the most rigorously substantiated scientific theories in existence. We have more evidence supporting the ToE than we do the Theory of Gravity, by a fucking mile. So for you to say you can "prove" gravity while you can't "prove" evolution makes it abundantly clear that i'd get more out of eating glue than having a discussion with you. It's that simple, simple mind.

Muh gooooooood though.

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Memes for argument. Darwin would be proud

“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”

“To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.”

“I concluded that this great group had been suddenly developed (Cambrian explosion) at the commencement of the tertiary series This was a sore trouble to me, adding as I thought one more instance of the abrupt appearance of a great group of species. ”

“On the sudden appearance of groups of Allied Species in the lowest known fossilferous strata: There is another and allied difficulty, which is much graver. I allude to the manner in which numbers of species of the same group suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rocks.”

“Consequently, if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”

“The several difficulties here discussed, namely our not finding in the successive formations infinitely numerous transitional links between the many species which now exist or have existed; the sudden manner in which whole groups of species appear in our European formations; the almost entire absence, as at present known, of fossiliferous formations beneath the Silurian strata, are all undoubtedly of the gravest nature.”

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Dude, i'm not going to go over the basics of speciation with the biology equivalent of a toddler. Yes, that's arrogance, because you believe dumb shit in lieu of checking into one of the most rigorously substantiated scientific theories in existence. We have more evidence supporting the ToE than we do the Theory of Gravity, by a fucking mile. So for you to say you can "prove" gravity while you can't "prove" evolution makes it abundantly clear that i'd get more out of eating glue than having a discussion with you. It's that simple, simple mind.

Muh gooooooood though.

Hmm Darwin himself seems to strongly disagree with you. You have strong evidence for adaptation. You have flimsy evidence at best for common ancestry all the way back to single cells.

You're ducking by essentially calling me stupid. That doesn't hold up in debate bud. You were better off not starting if you didn't intend to defend your position.

 

[HomerThompson]

 

[Falsedawn]

Memes for argument. Darwin would be proud

“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”

“To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.”

“I concluded that this great group had been suddenly developed (Cambrian explosion) at the commencement of the tertiary series This was a sore trouble to me, adding as I thought one more instance of the abrupt appearance of a great group of species. ”

“On the sudden appearance of groups of Allied Species in the lowest known fossilferous strata: There is another and allied difficulty, which is much graver. I allude to the manner in which numbers of species of the same group suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rocks.”

“Consequently, if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”

“The several difficulties here discussed, namely our not finding in the successive formations infinitely numerous transitional links between the many species which now exist or have existed; the sudden manner in which whole groups of species appear in our European formations; the almost entire absence, as at present known, of fossiliferous formations beneath the Silurian strata, are all undoubtedly of the gravest nature.”

Ahahahahahahabababaab

Wanna know how I know you Quoted the "difficulties" chapter of On the Origin of Species without having ever fucking read it?

Because this is the intro!

"Long before having arrived at this part of my work, a crowd of difficulties will have occurred to the reader. Some of them are so grave that to this day I can never reflect on them without being staggered; but, to the best of my judgment, the greater number are only apparent, and those that are real are not, I think, fatal to my theory."

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Ahahahahahahabababaab

Wanna know how I know you Quoted the "difficulties" chapter of On the Origin of Species without having ever fucking read it?

Because this is the intro!

"Long before having arrived at this part of my work, a crowd of difficulties will have occurred to the reader. Some of them are so grave that to this day I can never reflect on them without being staggered; but, to the best of my judgment, the greater number are only apparent, and those that are real are not, I think, fatal to my theory."

I dont need to read a book to quote a man. I feely admit I've never read it. So he says they're not fatal issues when they self evidently are? He contradicts himself no?

I open the invitation to you to show proof of a complex animal of today and it's ancestry going back to a single celled organism

 

[Falsedawn]

I dont need to read a book to quote a man. I feely admit I've never read it. So he says they're not fatal issues when they self evidently are? He contradicts himself no?

I open the invitation to you to show proof of a complex animal of today and it's ancestry going back to a single celled organism

Nothing -> Muh gooooooooood -> human -> Muh gooooooood -> Women

Q.E.D. science people!

Spoiler

 

[hillelslovak87]

In your typical style you shitposted like 7 links. Pick the strongest piece of evidence you have, and display it

I can demonstrate gravity to the extent it effects me. I cannot demonstrate single celled organisms becoming humans.

Providing you, the person who claims evolution is not real, with a massive amount of evidence and papers, is not shitposting.

Here's one, done by, you guessed it, an actual biologist.
http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/benton2.html

You seem to think that one reptile birthed one mammal, instead of numerous members of a species developing different adaptive advantages over many, many life cycles. We have observed evolution before our very eyes in insects, and many different types of birds. The polar bear, for example, has a gene that causes white hair. This gene gave an adaptive advantage to the bears that it was activated in. the bears that evolved into polar bears were migrating over snow. In the snow, the white colored bears had an advantage, because they could creep up on prey whilst camoflauged. Their brown colored siblings died out because they had no camo.

Natural selection being a fact is demonstrated every single day in genetics, immunology, and biology. Modern medicine is based on biology, which itself is based upon natural selection. You're perfectly fine reaping the massive rewards of natural selections in your vaccines, but since it trespasses on the horseshit claims made by sand strewn barbarians, you cant see how it's true, or refuse to admit it is.

You have made so many terrible claims, made so many terrible rationalizations, and you just keep making yourself sound dumber and dumber.

And if you really doubt evolution, ask yourself some questions: Why does my body contain the same genes as so many other animals and plants, and why do lesser animals have adaptive advantages over me, and why do bacteria and viruses evolve if evolution isnt real, and why are our bodies not designed nearly as well as they could be?

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Nothing -> Muh gooooooooood -> human -> Muh gooooooood -> Women

Q.E.D. science people!

Spoiler

I didnt claim to have proof for my belief with mountains of evidence. You're deflecting because you're a coward. I've answered what has been asked of me.

 

[Falsedawn]

I didnt claim to have proof for my belief with mountains of evidence. You're deflecting because you're a coward. I've answered what has been asked of me.

Dude, i'm not going to go over the basics of speciation with the biology equivalent of a toddler. Yes, that's arrogance, because you believe dumb shit in lieu of checking into one of the most rigorously substantiated scientific theories in existence. We have more evidence supporting the ToE than we do the Theory of Gravity, by a fucking mile. So for you to say you can "prove" gravity while you can't "prove" evolution makes it abundantly clear that i'd get more out of eating glue than having a discussion with you. It's that simple, simple mind.

Muh gooooooood though.

 

[hillelslovak87]

 

[hillelslovak87]

I didnt claim to have proof for my belief with mountains of evidence. You're deflecting because you're a coward. I've answered what has been asked of me.

Yeah, you just saw that I brought a mountain of evidence, neglected to read it, dismissed it, then showed a 2nd grade level of education, while basing your worldview on works by people who could not separate their food from their shit.

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Providing you, the person who claims evolution is not real, with a massive amount of evidence and papers, is not shitposting.

Here's one, done by, you guessed it, an actual biologist.
http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/benton2.html

You seem to think that one reptile birthed one mammal, instead of numerous members of a species developing different adaptive advantages over many, many life cycles. We have observed evolution before our very eyes in insects, and many different types of birds. The polar bear, for example, has a gene that causes white hair. This gene gave an adaptive advantage to the bears that it was activated in. the bears that evolved into polar bears were migrating over snow. In the snow, the white colored bears had an advantage, because they could creep up on prey whilst camoflauged. Their brown colored siblings died out because they had no camo.

Natural selection being a fact is demonstrated every single day in genetics, immunology, and biology. Modern medicine is based on biology, which itself is based upon natural selection. You're perfectly fine reaping the massive rewards of natural selections in your vaccines, but since it trespasses on the horseshit claims made by sand strewn barbarians, you cant see how it's true, or refuse to admit it is.

You have made so many terrible claims, made so many terrible rationalizations, and you just keep making yourself sound dumber and dumber.

And if you really doubt evolution, ask yourself some questions: Why does my body contain the same genes as so many other animals and plants, and why do lesser animals have adaptive advantages over me, and why do bacteria and viruses evolve if evolution isnt real, and why are our bodies not designed nearly as well as they could be?

Every bit about me not believing adaptation within class is a strawman and you're wasting your time. I believe in adaptation.

You posted a link referring mainly to archaeoptryx which links loosely to a few others if you believe the narrative. Shouldn't there be innumerous transitional fossils? Why do you champion behind archaeoptryx when that should be the rule not the exception? All you did was find a bird with some reptile characteristics or visa versa. Why am I to believe it's in transition? Shouldn't it be a very gradual showing of changes like you suggest.

You went from A to R to Z. What happened to the other 23 letters?

 

[oleDirtyBast4rd]

Dick tuck noted.

 

[Falsedawn]

Dick tuck noted.

Intellectual toddler noted.

Muh gooooooooooood.