Social Trans people being removed from the military by Trump for being mentally unfit.

evergreenrider said:
Serious question. I see many bring up that trans are not deployable due to their, "medical needs". Is this truly the case? If so, why are we staffing them in military roles to begin with? There's only so many desk jobs and pencil pushing available.
Click to expand...
80% of the military is non combat roles. That's at the low end.

It's called the tooth to tail ratio. Amount of support required for every combat role varies but the rule of thumb has been 4-1 for a while now.

Drone age probably pushed that into the 5-1 region. More machines decreases combat role requirements while increasing logistical and support requirements.

I doubt "medical needs" would be a significant issue in non combat roles.
 
kflo said:
Like I said, I’ve never seen this, ever. I don’t know what company would put a preference on fake trans people. I can’t imagine a hiring manager interviewing a fake trans person and it actually being a plus. It certainly limits upward mobility for most people.

That said, I’m Merican. You goofballs up north may do things very differently.
Click to expand...
well up here there is no "fake trans person" if you accuse someone of that no matter how obvious it is they are pulling some shit, that would be a human rights violation. It's just easier and safer to look the other way. It's incredibly disrespectful to actual trans.
 
Lycandroid said:
well up here there is no "fake trans person" if you accuse someone of that no matter how obvious it is they are pulling some shit, that would be a human rights violation. It's just easier and safer to look the other way. It's incredibly disrespectful to actual trans.
Click to expand...
That doesn’t mean they get preferential treatment or that it helps them get ahead. I have a hard time believing it’s a widespread issue.
 
kflo said:
That doesn’t mean they get preferential treatment or that it helps them get ahead. I have a hard time believing it’s a widespread issue.
Click to expand...
then apply for a work visa. Bring a winter jacket. See for yourself
 
Seems the tooth to tail rule of thumb of 1:4 is very general. For anyone interested:
1*b9A0mG3CZfTQt_EdTz23_w.png
 
Are they really being kicked out though? Seems like a political stunt.

The reason most of them are in is for the medical care.
 
Cid said:
80% of the military is non combat roles. That's at the low end.

It's called the tooth to tail ratio. Amount of support required for every combat role varies but the rule of thumb has been 4-1 for a while now.

Drone age probably pushed that into the 5-1 region. More machines decreases combat role requirements while increasing logistical and support requirements.

I doubt "medical needs" would be a significant issue in non combat roles.
Click to expand...
Appreciate the comprehensive answer brother. In that case, if someone wants to serve their country there should be no reason to withhold them from it.
 
Darkavius said:
Calling them the rainbow coalition is probably one of the more positive things you could say about their recruitment issues.
Click to expand...
If they stopped focusing on they themselves and fat lesbians, and made being in the military something to be proud of, they would help their recruiting. As is, no real man wants to fight for a bunch of gays and human resource managers that stole the military and the us government. No more incompetent homosexuals. Democrats have ruined the military.
 
Good, I want a lethal fighting force not a zesty bitchslapping force.
 
USA!USA! said:
There are 15,500 trannies in the military? I find that hard to believe. Wow that seems like A LOT.
Click to expand...
Send half of them as UN peacekeepers in Gaza. The rest to Ukraine. Those who come back after 5 years earn a snip-snip.
 
sanguinius said:
If they stopped focusing on they themselves and fat lesbians, and made being in the military something to be proud of, they would help their recruiting. As is, no real man wants to fight for a bunch of gays and human resource managers that stole the military and the us government. No more incompetent homosexuals. Democrats have ruined the military.
Click to expand...

I want to reply to this seriously but this sounds like statements made from a South Park episode. There's no way this is anything but sarcasm.
 
Zazen said:
What’s with the rights obsession with trans people? Does this bring housing down? Food prices? You guys just love these distractions meanwhile he’s signing bills that increase drug costs and doing whatever he can to increase profits of the wealthiest
Click to expand...

They don’t care about those things. They would rather live in total squalor as long as no trans people or immigrants come into America.

You think they are normal?
 
Darkavius said:
I want to reply to this seriously but this sounds like statements made from a South Park episode. There's no way this is anything but sarcasm.
Click to expand...

The fact that you think young men not wanting to be the fighting force under fat cat ladies and men in dresses is a joke shows that you have no understanding with the issue at hand.
 
And a big ol LOL to posters thinking it's the gays and trans in the military as to why enlistment is down. The feds lowered physical standards due to enlistment being down, which kind of opened the doors to this in some degree. But by and large, no one wants to fucking die for lies and "banker" wars. Social media has lifted the veil to the MIC to such a degree, no amount of Call Of Duty or Top Gun is going to gain that ground back. Unless of course, another terrorist attack on US soil in a major city happens again. Worked the first time for enlistment numbers..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Spounman
Social Trans Pride flag hung at Yosemite National Park off El Capitan
5 6 7
Replies
134
Views
4K
nonoob
nonoob

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,173
Messages
57,972,497
Members
175,887
Latest member
kaneoconnor98

Share this page

Back
Top