I think we have a big difference of opinion about the value of anecdotal evidence. My point in mentioning my wife (not GF) and others I know was to show that I personally see a lot of anecdotal evidence of mobility in CA. You see the opposite. Fair enough. I believe you, and I believe there are other people who see even more of it than I do. Here's the data:
http://www.pewstates.org/research/data-visualizations/economic-mobility-of-the-states-85899381539
Basically, the South (including Texas) sucks by that measure, the Northeast is very good and everyone else, including CA, is the same.
I certainly would like to see more of it. I don't really get what this discussion has to do with that, though. My general belief is that by almost any way you look at it, the Northeastern states are the best-run, the South are the worst-run, and everyone else (including CA) is in the middle. Texas is one of the least-bad of the Southern states, so it's odd to me that people always try to contrast Texas and CA (because I see them as both middle-of-the-pack states that are not as ideologically extreme as they are often portrayed as). Why don't conservatives compare Alabama and Massachusetts?
Here in Plano we see the effects of this general move to Texas. House prices jumped 20% in the last year after 10 years of being the same.
They're going to change the demographics and politics of the state and pretty soon you'll have 10 round magazine limits and DMVs built specifically for illegal aliens.
I know California refugees are flocking Nevada, as well. Good thing the heat keeps most of them as visitors only, but enough of them have moved here that they've changed the politics over the decades.
Why is this happening? Why are the powers that be not fixing it?
So New York ranks highest on social mobility according to that site.
Yet from everything I've seen, it has the highest Gini coefficient of any state in the US.
http://www.reuters.com/subjects/income-inequality
Which to me, seems a little weird to say the least.
New York is a bit of a special case since the incredibly high wealth of many people in NYC are going to throw the GINI coefficient out of whack. But the fact that there are many super rich people in NYC who drive the average income far past the median income doesn't invalidate the fact that New York is also the place where it's easiest to go from poor to middle class. Frankly I think it's a great example of how it doesn't really matter for social stability if some people are vey rich if the vast majority of people at least have realistic chances of bettering their own situation.
You can't fix shit in Cali. The state constitution is set up that way, between public referendums and the inability to deal with spending problems. Cali is totally in thrall to public sector unions as well, they're bankrupting themselves buying retired firefighters Porches. They have significant spending problems and neither the political will nor in some cases even the ability (due to past legislative decisions) to do anything about them. California is beautiful, has a great public university system, and is the center of innovation in our economy. But those great things have let it slide on some very real public budgetary issues and those chickens are coming home to roost. It's a terribly managed state and I don't see it getting any better. I wouldn't keep my HQ there either unless I had to to access a specific source of talent, by which I mean Silicon Valley. Certainly I get why Toyota would move; plenty of good marketers and accountants in TX and the legal and tax regimes are much more favorable.
Doesn't matter how many stinky hippies come over. This is Texas.
We won't turn blue. No more vacancy in Austin for Cali and Portland people sorry. The people here are fed up with how many people are moving here and cluttering up the streets daily.
When you say "spending problem," what do you mean? We're not facing any real budgetary issues right now.
We won't turn blue. No more vacancy in Austin for Cali and Portland people sorry. The people here are fed up with how many people are moving here and cluttering up the streets daily.
The GINI coefficient and income mobility tend to be directly correlated. Maybe New York is some kind of crazy outlier but the idea that the state with the highest gini coefficient also has the highest income mobility is something that makes me very skeptical.
California's budget is only balanced if you ignore huge shortfalls in teacher and public employee retirement funds which could very well lead the state to bankruptcy within a few decades.
The state's definitely in trouble, though given the massive resources both physical and human in the state I think there's plenty of hope if you can muster the political will to do something about it. Personally, I have my doubts that will happen because your liberals are too liberal and your conservatives are too conservatives. CA needs some moderates to actually get shit done.
We won't turn blue. No more vacancy in Austin for Cali and Portland people sorry. The people here are fed up with how many people are moving here and cluttering up the streets daily.
We won't turn blue. No more vacancy in Austin for Cali and Portland people sorry. The people here are fed up with how many people are moving here and cluttering up the streets daily.
Funny how they built that toll road you can haul ass on outside the city and nobody uses it. Guess they should have found a different way to ease traffic on the 35.