My point is, even though I detest PED abusers, you can't say he's 0-21. That's stupid
It's all good, but what if Jones doesn't have the cardio to implement his iq,without the peds. Embrace the grind.I am a DC fan. With that being said, I respectfully disagree. I truly believe Jones is the best fighter in MMA period. Mostly because he is the total package. DC was winning the exchanges in the 2nd fight. Jones overcame this by implementing his strategy, which eventually lead to a brutal TKO. He out IQ'ed Comrier, in my opinion. Did Jones cheat? Yes. Does this change my opinion on whether or not he's better than DC? No.
I understand that. And I agree with the concept. Unfortunately none of that is evidence of anything. All any one of us can say for certain is that Jon Jones has beaten DC and DC has not beaten Jon Jones.You have a good point, but there’s too much history of abuse to ignore.
Plus, if he defeated him soundly the first time around, why would he risk getting caught in the second fight and totally destroy himself?
This is why people don’t have confidence in their first match.
No UsadaWhy do people insist on ignoring their first fight?
That's pretty simple: They believe that Jones was using back then, too.
I understand that. And I agree with the concept. Unfortunately none of that is evidence of anything. All any one of us can say for certain is that Jon Jones has beaten DC and DC has not beaten Jon Jones.
Is Jon Jones a POS? Absolutely. A cheater? Definitely. So why not make him 0-22 under the same logic?
My point is, even though I detest PED abusers, you can't say he's 0-21. That's stupid
The guy I was responding to didWho cares what his record says?
Seems pretty arbitrary to me
Nah you are wrong bro. Tainted supplements. DC isn't a real champ. He only holds belts for Jon while he's taking breaks. DC is always second to Jones. Jones is the GOAT. Hate all you want
I am a DC fan. With that being said, I respectfully disagree. I truly believe Jones is the best fighter in MMA period. Mostly because he is the total package. DC was winning the exchanges in the 2nd fight. Jones overcame this by implementing his strategy, which eventually lead to a brutal TKO. He out IQ'ed Comrier, in my opinion. Did Jones cheat? Yes. Does this change my opinion on whether or not he's better than DC? No.
The T:E ratio of Jones that was said to be a clear sign of juicing?Why do people insist on ignoring their first fight?
Jon Jones is way better more creative more diverse striking better in the clench(wore D.C. Out) better fighting close up, better at implitimg throws plus landing take downs, more tricky and more athletic. D.C. Just works really hard and he obsesses over Bones. All that desire won't make D.C. a better fighter. Jon Jones is better at him at everything. It's not hard to argue it's actually very easy to call it a fact.
Daniel has 1 legit belt. The LHW belt was given to him, Jon kicked his head in exactly as he predicted. Mystic Jon style. Jon is better than Daniel in every aspect of mma. OooLaLa, he took wiener pills before the 2nd fight, if you and me fought and I took a dik pill before we fought do you honestly believe it would help me win the fight? Mabye by ktfo when I swing my schlong at your chin and you get ko'd cold? I think not budBut my dear, dear Sherdog manages to do so quite consistently.
I'm aware that for the most part this forum is made up of the dregs of society, but how do you justify it to yourself?
JJ himself didn't believe he could beat DC, which is why he cheated. So why do you have so much belief in a man that didn't believe in himself?
Bonus points will be awarded for people stringing together coherent sentences, even if the opinion is ultimately incorrect.
Come at me with your best sex blancmanges of logic. And know this, regardless of how this thread goes, each of my legs will still be longer than the other.
If Cormier was better he would have won one.