Tony, by being a much better version of Nate.
Tony by being way better striker and just as good on the ground
Way better striker ? I dont know definetly throws more spinning shit, but Nates striking is underrated IMO
Yes Tony strikes with 8 points Nate only boxesWay better striker ? I dont know definetly throws more spinning shit, but Nates striking is underrated IMO
Nates record is misleading. He was taking on fights no fighter would have taken...especially early in his career. Talk about not giving a flux.
5 rounds. That is my dream matchup who takes it. Im going with nate.
Man I meant Nate lolWay better striker ? I dont know definetly throws more spinning shit, but Nates striking is underrated IMO
"only boxes"Yes Tony strikes with 8 points Nate only boxes
Never suggested Nate isn’t good. Tony is simply better than him at what he does.View attachment 417733
View attachment 417735
View attachment 417737
View attachment 417739
View attachment 417743
Nates record is misleading. He was taking on fights no fighter would have taken...especially early in his career. Talk about not giving a flux.
Nate Diaz is extremely underrated...especially by Shertards who dont know their azz from a hole in the ground.