Tony Ferguson on kneeling

The BLM movement, itself, is not a Marxist movement, in any way, shape or form. So it's not that I'm overlooking anything. It is a 1950's McCarthy-ist smear attempt, using a boogeyman that has no relevance in our society today.
Lmao BLM is not a Marxist movement.


Well let's just look at what the leaders of BLM have to say


What was that you say "we are trained Marxist"

Wow look it's another liberal talking about something he has no fucking clue about, while parading his ignorance as some sort of intellect.
 
kneeling is great for being submissive and/or sucking dick. maybe if you drop something.
 
This is the guy that had the mental break and kidnapped his wife and child, right?
 
Lmao BLM is not a Marxist movement.


Well let's just look at what the leaders of BLM have to say


What was that you say "we are trained Marxist"

Wow look it's another liberal talking about something he has no fucking clue about, while parading his ignorance as some sort of intellect.


I guess you have no idea what constitutes a "movement." I already addressed that point, previously, and quoted people who actually study these things for a living.

The entire premise that she is responding to in stating that is people, EVEN FROM INSIDE THE MOVEMENT, noting that BLM, itself, seems to "have no ideological direction." So people observing the movement itself, and people participating as active members, have made it a poitn to note that there is no particular ideology being pushed or imposed.

Which is more relevant to what the movement is? What it is? What it does? How it has been observed? Or what someone involved in it did at some point in the past with some other organization?

It's funny that the same clowns who love to parade their favorite boogeyman, George Soros, don't seem to struggle with the idea that he made billions from being an entrepreneurial capitalist, and founding and running organizations that operate in that mode, while accusing him of being a "socialist."

And yet three people who have certain ECONOMIC beliefs can't try to drive a movement about SOCIAL issues without making it primarily about something completely different than that movement?

Really?

Wow, there's another conservative who can't read, while calling others ignorant.

You sure you want to do this? This is probably beyond the "See Spot run. Run Spot run" level of understanding you want to bring to the discussion.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top