- Joined
- Mar 29, 2007
- Messages
- 723
- Reaction score
- 0
1. Thanks for the article Cash Bill. Is Cesar's english and grammar that good, or was it edited by someone. Just curious.
English major at UC Berkeley.
1. Thanks for the article Cash Bill. Is Cesar's english and grammar that good, or was it edited by someone. Just curious.
This thread is win in so many ways!
I learned that even at 30 years old I am still a teenager!
I'm not a big fan of no-gi myself, but I still train it 1-2x a week. I'll always do at least 1 session, but I feel like I can just use my strength to get into many positions without using much skill. I'm not a big fan of this.
I am much more interested in refined technique so that is why I love Gi much more.
You must be one huge guy training with small people then.
And finally, while I agree that the gi makes your escapes more precise, I think no-gi is better for refining your control because you have less to work with and are therefore forced to perfect your body positioning and use of gi-less grips.
English major at UC Berkeley.
the gi obviously isn't useless. when I get older and lose strength and athletic ability, honestly I'll probably start really training in a gi. the only really advantage I see of the gi is that it makes it more technical - not to say no-gi isn't technical, it just lends itself to more explosive movements like yanking arms out of arm bars.
Also, I think Newerest is calling Jag old...
Thank you for the thoughtful reply. At our school(s) we have people who share a similar opinion. Jake Shields never wears a gi. Caio Terra (no gi world champ) believes strongly in the gi. I like the fact that we have an environment where different ideas are respected.
I mean, I really hate to be the dick that says this, but what if I take off my shirt in a fight? how could training in a gi possibly help me defend then, against the clothing grabbing.
I don't understand how the gi makes people better no-gi. I guess it helps you get the reps in and makes your hips fucking mobile as hell (the grips in the gi will definitely allow you a better chance to work shit like spider guard and open guard game) but outside of that I just don't see how it's applicable to no-gi. it seems like when your whole system of submissions is based around setting up mistakes with colar chokes, or having a sleeve to hang onto, that when you do no-gi those tendancies will not be there to use.
the gi obviously isn't useless. when I get older and lose strength and athletic ability, honestly I'll probably start really training in a gi. the only really advantage I see of the gi is that it makes it more technical - not to say no-gi isn't technical, it just lends itself to more explosive movements like yanking arms out of arm bars.
I'll pose this hypothetical situation, say Grappler A has done no gi the whole time he's been training and Grappler B has done gi the whole time he's been training. they're both equal skill for their sports.
in a no gi situation grappler A is able to pull his arm out of grappler B's arm bar attempt, sensing it coming
in a gi sitatuon grappler A is NOT able to pull his arm out, and has to tap
does this make grappler b a better grappler? or does it just mean that the gi allows less mistakes? I think the latter.
I totally agree. The reason I know it is true is that I hate nogi passionately. I hate the nakedness of not having well defined grips and only training can make it so that I don't feel that same panic in a situation where I don't have a nice parka to hold onto.
Only? Making you more technical isn't enough?