Tito Ortiz endorses Donald Trump

Well, apparently, you and Tito think it's ok to say that immigrants, documented or not, are rapists. Apparently, you also think it is ok for a candidate to say that one of his opponents is lenient on illegal immigration because of his Mexican-born wife. You might also think it's alright to connect violent crimes to race and ethnicity. I don't. Maybe it's a question of point of view.
Undocumented people are criminals who have no right to complain. If they want to cry, they can do it from their home country.

Jeb Bush married a woman from Mexico, learned Spanish, moved to Miami, converted to Catholicism, and claimed on voter forms to be Hispanic. Trump was 100% right about Jeb.
 
Bunch of people with brain damage are endorsing Trump. I'm sure his campaign is very pleased.
 
Why, hello there.
Screen-Shot-2015-05-29-at-11.07.59-AM.png

Rand would legalize all drugs, Cannabis included.

He also wouldn't let the NSA collect records about you.
 
I cant believe how many liberals are on this site. Its going to be either Trump or Cruz... Rubio still has a slim chance. On the other side its going to be either Hillary or Bernie. Hillary and Bernie are the 2 worst choices. Would have been better to have Jim Webb or anyone else as the democrat candidate.
 
I cant believe how many liberals are on this site. Its going to be either Trump or Cruz... Rubio still has a slim chance. On the other side its going to be either Hillary or Bernie. Hillary and Bernie are the 2 worst choices. Would have been better to have Jim Webb or anyone else as the democrat candidate.
Jim Webb had too much testosterone for the modern femocrats. When he bragged about killing a guy in Vietnam, the Democratic party were like "We don't know you."
 
The guy is Mexican and is voting for Trump......that's a new level of stupid

That is the dumbest argument anti Trump whiners claim. He cant deport legal citizens, he is only talking about the illegals.
 
Rand would legalize all drugs, Cannabis included.

He also wouldn't let the NSA collect records about you.
Rand and Bernie are the two best choices imo. And not just because of where they stand in drug legalization.
 
For an opinion on politics,

An mma fighter is the last person I'm going to look to..
 
Tito was on "Celebrity Apprentice", so his opinion is biased.
 
Rand and Bernie are the two best choices imo. And not just because of where they stand in drug legalization.

Rand would also legalize prostitution. He'd never let us go to war overseas, and he'd get the government out of places that it doesn't absolutely need to be.

Bernie's downsides would mostly be negated by the congressional system, but he will be terrible for job creation. His attitudes hold back progression; a great example being his position on Uber.

Bernie would use Net Neutrality to fight companies like Comcast, whereas Rand would simply allow competitors pole-access so Comcast has to compete. Its the difference between an expensive and ineffective solution, versus a real solution.
 
Personally I refuse to leave anything off the table when it comes to explaining the issues of life, but in most cases I think people who make statements like that are blaming a culture, not genes.

Maybe. Maybe those who suggest a relation between race and crime are in fact blaming a culture instead of colour itself. Still, it's outrageous nonetheless. There are no logical arguments backing up a direct relation between crime and a specific culture. Anthropology is not that simple.

The suggested link between crime and a specific "culture", like you said, in my opinion, comes from the fact that criminality levels are obviously higher in poor communities, which are, for historical reasons, formed in its majority by ethnicities other than caucasian. Honestly, I don't think blaming certain people - be it for their colour or their culture - is part of an adequate solution for the violence problem.

I don't know if the suggested relations between crime and ethnicity are talking about colour itself or culture. Still, it seems to me like prejudice disguised as political speech anyway.

But hell, I think I'll always see you to my right as you'll always see me to your left, and this discussion is probably as endless as the good and old "who's the best fighter in the history of the sport". Hahah.
 
One of the best things about Trump is that the Republicans hate him as much as the democrats. Trump isn't a career establishment politician so both parties are scared of him. Stopping illegal immigration would be the best thing for our country right now.
 
The idea that all immigrants must by default support amnesty, illegal immigration etc is odd. I have a lot of family who emigrated from Mexico (legally) and they absolutely loathe illegal immigrants, because they understand the rule of law and the notion that a country without borders isn't a country at all.

A person can favor immigration reform, and, overall, be in favor of immigrants and fast-tracked immigration opportunities, approachable immigration, and still value the rule of law, proper vetting and be anti-illegal immigration.

I'm also baffled by people who can say they support or favor both Rand Paul OR Bernie Sanders. These guys are polar opposites. Paul is a libertarian who favors small government and expanded individual freedom. Bernie Sanders is big government authoritarian statist.
 
Maybe. Maybe those who suggest a relation between race and crime are in fact blaming a culture instead of colour itself. Still, it's outrageous nonetheless. There are no logical arguments backing up a direct relation between crime and a specific culture. Anthropology is not that simple.

The suggested link between crime and a specific "culture", like you said, in my opinion, comes from the fact that criminality levels are obviously higher in poor communities, which are, for historical reasons, formed in its majority by ethnicities other than caucasian. Honestly, I don't think blaming certain people - be it for their colour or their culture - is part of an adequate solution for the violence problem.

I don't know if the suggested relations between crime and ethnicity are talking about colour itself or culture. Still, it seems to me like prejudice disguised as political speech anyway.

But hell, I think I'll always see you to my right as you'll always see me to your left, and this discussion is probably as endless as the good and old "who's the best fighter in the history of the sport". Hahah.

A great example would be a post I saw the other day, where a group polled African nations on "when is it acceptable to beat your wife?".

Some nations such as the Congo thought it was alright to beat their wives for things like burning dinner, whereas others saw virtually no scenario in which doing so was acceptable. Lots of things varied, like race, religion, income, and other things, but for one reason or another the majority of people from the Congo thought wife-beating is just fine. That's a cultural thing. If you stuck a white person in the Congo with a traditional family from the area and raised that white person there, he'd end up thinking the same way they do.

Your culture affects everything about you, from your opinion on whether or not you should bring your entire family with you grocery shopping, to your position on consent and female obligation, all the way to whether or not you believe in God (and which God).
 
I'm also baffled by people who can say they support or favor both Rand Paul OR Bernie Sanders. These guys are polar opposites. Paul is a libertarian who favors small government and expanded individual freedom. Bernie Sanders is big government authoritarian statist.

Those people just value social issues or being anti-war WAY more than fiscal issues.

I've know a few people that weren't aware there was a choice like Rand out there, and I think a lot of left-wingers fall into that camp. Its easier to step from supporting a guy like Bernie to a guy like Rand than you might guess.
 
Mexicans are a net plus to American society. Why anyone would want to round up and deport them (not the violent criminals), I'm not too sure. I don't think I'm for legalization/citizenship, but I don't mind the way things are right now.

Murder, rape, home invasion, drug cartels armed with rocket launchers from the government, ID theft, unemployment of real Americans.

It's been great, that's why Mexico is fighting to keep them because they are so valuable.

Europeans on student visas here in prestigious universities go home at once and let anyone bold enough to jump the border stay!

More enrichment!
 
And culture, and customs, and values... that isn't to say one is any worse or better than the other, but the parallel you have drawn is tenuous.

And what is with people's obsession with viewing history through rose colored glasses - by every metric, American's today have a higher standard of living than they did in the 50s. Not to mention the significant strides in gender and racial equality that were conspicuously absent in the so called "golden age" of America.

Although I suppose if you prefer a time where coloreds still drank from different water fountains, and the solution to spousal abuse was a pear of dark sunglasses, then modern America may not be for you.

What were you complaining about again? Water fountains? Spousal abuse? Back of the bus? Racial Equality? lol

Let's see how equality and diversity has improved London...

Yes, the 50s was terrible. We make them use separate fountain, women were abused. lol

 
Last edited:
Because swapping those places for China or Iran is good?

If you want a real anti-war candidate there's only one: Rand Paul. Bonus points for being a real fiscal conservative too.

Oh man, you Libtards are the fucking worst.
 
Back
Top