Dang we all old. I remember this visiting a friend in Arizona. Now I'm like 40.
Dang we all old. I remember this visiting a friend in Arizona. Now I'm like 40.
I'd day the main difference is that Tony had a much better chin. And part of that is due to fighting in a much lighter weight class. You rarely see LWs, even way past their prime ones like late-stage Tony and BJ Penn, getting KO'd in the 1st round fight after fight.Tony lasted 23.5 of the 25 minutes versus Gaethje. Chuck was unconscious against Rampage in less than 2. And Tony fought well thereafter, making fights competitive and winning plenty of rounds against elite competitors. Chuck got dropped in literally every single fight thereafter, lost every fight save for one, and was knocked unconscious in every loss save for one. Tony went from being top 2 or 3 to being top 10-15. Chuck went from being able to compete to being unable to compete. If all you mean is both had their time in the sun, fair enough, but beyond that, Chuck and Tony aren't really comparable.
They only remember the really good fights through the prism of nostalgia. Some probably think a lot of those fights occurred in the same card lol.While people on here like to pretend at how stacked cards used to be, the UFC 71 card was objectively laughable in how shallow it was.
72 was somehow worse.
That’s a good set overall but the 33 main event was a bad one in the bunch, it was one of the worst PPV main events up to that point when Tito and Vlad decided to put on a hugging contest.Look at UFCs 31-39, those are unfairly amazing events full of champs, legends, and HOFers without a single bad fight in the bunch, because they happened so infrequently that every event felt like a best of. How I miss those days...
I'd day the main difference is that Tony had a much better chin. And part of that is due to fighting in a much lighter weight class. You rarely see LWs, even way past their prime ones like late-stage Tony and BJ Penn, getting KO'd in the 1st round fight after fight.
Beyond having a strong chin and being very durable, Tony's decline has been similar to Chuck's. AFAIK he's only won 1 round since losing to Gaethje--the Chandler fight where he promptly got KO'd in Round 2.
That’s a good set overall but the 33 main event was a bad one in the bunch, it was one of the worst PPV main events up to that point when Tito and Vlad decided to put on a hugging contest.
Well, I'd seen the whooping Rampage had put on Chuck in PRIDE,
To people who think this was yesterday.
Does it feel like Chuck was just on top? Does it feel like you clearly remember Chuck on prime? Do you often mix Chuck in with todays title picture? Do you know how many fights there have been after this fight? Do you remember Chucks failed comebacks, his retirement and then him coming back to get knocked out by Tito?
Put all these questions in perspective so it might get easier to cope with passing of time and realize that this fight indeed did happen a very fucking long time ago.
I was like 6 at the time
But Sherdog was a blowjob machine for Chutebox back then. Discussions about Rampage were flooded with "Wanderlei washed up Rampage" "Rampage will never be the same" type comments. There was no serious discussion or expectations of Rampage.
Rampage was fine in that run, its where he picked up his best boxing skills and aaaalmost landed a super uppercat on Matt, too bad he missed and it was a lack luster fight.At the time though a lot of popular feeling was Rampage was not the same after his loses to Wand and Shogun, he'd looked quite passive in the run after that with many feeling Lindland actually beat him.
I strongly guess Dana felt the same, he thought it was a chance to get Chuck his win back, indeed I think all Chucks loses in that run were in matches he was favourite in beforehand which I think Dana booked him to win, Rashad was on a rather unimpressive run almost losing to Bisping, Shogun looked less than great vs Coleman.