- Joined
- Sep 2, 2003
- Messages
- 18,234
- Reaction score
- 17,213
I wouldn't consider a 4 month time frame as a fast turn around.
Same. I feel like anything over 7-8 weeks shouldn't be considered quick.
I wouldn't consider a 4 month time frame as a fast turn around.
Rumble? Is he really back, or isn't that just a rumour?That doesnt leave many options for Rumble, who I thought would get 1 of these 2 next.
Krylov, Walker, & Ankalaev are healthy & available yet.
It's 4 months away, time to heal, rest and then 2 month camp, nothing lebenesqueI mean...He didn't take as much "Damage" persae, but this is still a fast turn around. I guess he's trying to wash the taste of getting Tapped Out out of his mouth as quick as he can so I guess I don't blame him lol.
He had Glover dead to rights twice, but failed to finish the Job, and as someone that got Hailed for taking it to one of the GOATS in Jon Jones on one Leg, you gotta wonder how the loss weighs on his mental seeing how he couldn't bounce back with a Win and prove those people right.
Maybe jiri vs glover for TS if they pass glover up for izzy?Any timeline of when Rumble can actually fight/meets the "in the pool" requirements though?
Yeah. Disappointing that they're rewarding that by giving him a fight against a guy in the position of Santos (bigger name/ranking coming early off a loss where he took decent damage)
Santos can match Rackics los kicksRakic wins the same way he did against Smith
I wouldn't consider a 4 month time frame as a fast turn around.
set to take place at march 6 personally i don t think thiago will crumble like smith did and take rakic s glass jaw off
We know.
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...ar-rakic-on-march-6th.4146617/#post-162596742
Use the search feature noob