- Joined
- Nov 20, 2010
- Messages
- 7,099
- Reaction score
- 2,623
Nah. Thought Condit won. Thought that went the wrong way, and most agree with me. But it wasn't a "robbery" because Condit winning was still a 48-47 score with many close competitive rounds, and no one is going to make excuses claiming Lawler "ran".Why should a bunch of nerds larping as MMA judges mean anything?
For every Diaz fan where Condit is in there head, there is a Condit fan with Lawler in their head. Rent-free.
Not close to the same. Now, if one of the judges had scored it 49-46 in either direction, I'd have a beef. Very close fights being scored very closely against how I see it is generally not an actual definition of a robbery, but certainly is the Sherdog definition.