The Weasle...

Damn @Arrrrgh just Barboza kicked the TS like he was Terry Etim just now i just seent it
Lol.
I was just tired when I read TS's OP. It wasn't as bad as I made it out to be.
The edit is what saved my shitposting-troll-ass.
 
his breakdowns are ok but the hypothetical matchups between weight classes are odd

he said Ankalaev would beat most heavyweights including Gane... but lose to stipe and ngannou.

timestamped
 
If it makes you feel better, I’ve never heard of the weasel, heavy hands or slackly j
 
I enjoy a lot of his content although I admittedly don't watch much anymore. That being said I'm not a huge fan of his videos where he goes through older fights with controversial decisions and determines who actually won. I see the appeal but in real time judges don't have the benefit of watching every single strike in slowmo and the ability to watch every sequence over and over.
 
Ngannou kills any flyweight 10/10 times. This is delusional manlet fan fiction.
 
He's probably an intelligent guy with little bias and reasonable takes on things..

Sherdog usually hates that..

If you consider MM having a 10-20% chance on Ngannou a "reasonable take", you are a complete noob. No shame in it, but noobs should be listening, not talking.

Even Glover, Fedor, Bader, Blachowicz would be that big of an underdog against Ngannou. That's basically like a -800. The kind of stuff you see with dominant champions fighting #5 guys in their own weight class.

MM isn't even at the top of his own division - 7 weight classes down, and has no KO power even at his own weight class, so the fluke KO is essentially impossible.

Being on here reminds me of why betting on MMA has been easy for me. Lots of people with terrible takes and no concept of probabilities.
 
Last edited:
MM ever beating Ngannou in a fight is not a reasonable take

If it were a 30 second fight, MM MIGHT get in a few jabs at Ngannous thigh for an easy win. However, there is no way MM never gets tagged, clinched or taken down over the course of 15 minutes by someone with way longer reach. One time of getting tagged or grabbed and it's over.

In other words, you're absolutely right. Yeah
 
Last edited:
Sure, but I bet you have some other takes, I, or someone else, would find not very smart...
it was not just a bad take, it was terrible. comically terrible. it's also one of many times i've heard him say something other-worldly stupid, talking very confidently about things he's just dead wrong about. there are creators out there less popular with much more sensical insights with a much smaller audience. Weasle's content is intended for the lowest common denominator, i get that, but MM being capped 1/10 against Ngannou is pushing all reasonable boundaries. why do you give a shit if I point this out. "make your own content see how good it is" give me a fucking break... you act like i'm commenting on the special olympics or something, not a youtuber with close to 300k subs. i'm sure weasle's career of producing sub-mediocre content for morons will survive my shitpost, so don't get your panties in a wad
 
it was not just a bad take, it was terrible. comically terrible. it's also one of many times i've heard him say something other-worldly stupid, talking very confidently about things he's just dead wrong about. there are creators out there less popular with much more sensical insights with a much smaller audience. Weasle's content is intended for the lowest common denominator, i get that, but MM being capped 1/10 against Ngannou is pushing all reasonable boundaries. why do you give a shit if I point this out. "make your own content see how good it is" give me a fucking break... you act like i'm commenting on the special olympics or something, not a youtuber with close to 300k subs. i'm sure weasle's career of producing sub-mediocre content for morons will survive my shitpost, so don't get your panties in a wad

No, I'm not acting like you're commenting on he special Olympics. I'm acting like you are getting your panties in a wad, as you state it. You made this thread solely because your panties are in a wad. You also don't bring an intelligent argument against his position, instead you just shit on him. He might be wrong, but you're not coming across any more intelligent than you make him out to be. Just an emotional wreck with his panties in a wad because he got triggered by a YTer.
 
No, I'm not acting like you're commenting on he special Olympics. I'm acting like you are getting your panties in a wad, as you state it. You made this thread solely because your panties are in a wad. You also don't bring an intelligent argument against his position, instead you just shit on him. He might be wrong, but you're not coming across any more intelligent than you make him out to be. Just an emotional wreck with his panties in a wad because he got triggered by a YTer.
Mkay
 
No, it's not..

But if you speculate on youtube for a living you're bound to say some stupid shit..

It's like with rogan.. people with single digit iq's find the "once ever" quote and bite down on it like a pitbull..

If the roles were reversed and you'd put the one with the critique in thousands of hours of public conversation they would probably seem way stupider than rogan.. or the weasle..

i will definitely say things that people disagree with, but saying Ronda is once in a lifetime athlete ever and that MM could beat Ngannou is absolutely idiotic and you guessing i would say something as bad or worse just shows how weak your argument is.
 


is absolutely terrible. Can someone explain how he amassed a following 3x that of Slacky J and 8x of Heavy Hands?
This "let's talk" segment autoplayed on Youtube this morning. Around the 16:25 mark, in the context of discussing the relevance of weight classes, he capped Mighty Mouses's chances of beating Ngannou at 10-20% because he is "wuuaaaaaaaaay more technical."
i've never heard a dumber take in my life. who listens to this guy? can you explain the appeal?

I honestly don't like Heavy Hands that much either.
But I totally agree with your take on the weasel, I find most of his breakdowns to be extremely simple; he just points out shit that literally anybody could see, even people that don't watch MMA.

Jack Slack, BJJ Scout, and Luke Thomas are the only analysts that I care about.
 
Usually I like his content a lot, but listening to this I was blown away how stupid it was. There’s no chance for MM to beat Ngannou. The smallest guy to have a chance against him is probably Izzy
 
Not that Weasel. The other one.

Holy fuck, there’s literally a guy called the weasle? Damn. I’m way out of touch. Thx for checkin me HHJ. Deleting my post now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HHJ
Yeah bro he’s gunna point fight Ngannou to victory………..

Lol

Ngannou wouldn’t even need to hit or take him down. Simply get any kind of hold on him and launch him out of the octagon.

wait would that be a dq for Francis or MM? If Francis there’s probably a 10-20% chance then
 
Only casuals and idiots listen to him hes a clown
I have 10 million posts and im from the NHB daze. Im a big fan. He gets his shit up like immediatley after the events. I enjoy his content.
 
his content is fine. Obviously sometimes he says things I dont agree with such as the Ngannou vs. MM stuff or also Ankalaev beating Cyril Gane but overall he's got good breakdowns and prediction videos.
 


is absolutely terrible. Can someone explain how he amassed a following 3x that of Slacky J and 8x of Heavy Hands?
This "let's talk" segment autoplayed on Youtube this morning. Around the 16:25 mark, in the context of discussing the relevance of weight classes, he capped Mighty Mouses's chances of beating Ngannou at 10-20% because he is "wuuaaaaaaaaay more technical."
i've never heard a dumber take in my life. who listens to this guy? can you explain the appeal?

How is a 1-2 minute sound bite representative of someone's analytic skills?
 
Back
Top