• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

The War Room Lounge v.8: Conor was Framed by the Deep State Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
She was the easy front runner for the next president of the United States.


You realize you’re sitting here claiming the freaking Clintons have no influence in Washington???

On the same day the oig report about McCabes wrongdoing comes out?

Come on son...




PS, duck number two on Bill meeting with Putin and cashing a half million dollar check. Three times is a tko.


So you can't explain how Hillary could have made that deal, and now your mind is squirming like a toad trying to conflate it with the McCabe thing<Lmaoo>

For the thousandth time:

"Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.

All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved."

And since you have made it clear reading is not your thing, here is a PBS News segment about Trump and right wingers selling you bullshit:




As for Bills' speaking, as I said, check your tattoo and it will answer your question about Bill Clinton's speech: "Hillary didn't have to power to make that deal, and there is no evidence that any uranium ended up in Russia."

In a quid pro quo Bob, you need a payoff. Bill Clinton also made a speech in 2008 for $500,000 for Tony Robbins' Power Within brand, can your squirming toad brain conflate that into your conspiracy theories?

http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...hecking-clinton-cash-author-claim-about-bill/

th
th
 
You're asserting that the Russian government offered Trump something in exchange for hacking the DNC e-mail system and releasing the e-mails through a 3rd party. If you take a moment to think about it, there's a lot of complicated steps involved there. Nevertheless, you have not spelled out how those steps were carried out, probably because you don't have a good explanation and yet your subconscious accepts the "Russia collusion" narrative uncritically.

The subconscious is more powerful than most realize. @senri

Keep throbbing with Mr Savage. This is the key to his awakening. All need to be gaped, when the awakening actualizes.. He is the arbiter that will simply be...
 
Tribalism

Ennui... Mr Savage has yet to migrate into The Nexus... A path that is inevitable to him.... Regardless of bets or idolizing ones intellect, there is simply no escaping the super ordinate proposition towards the finality of that which radiates... There is only acceptance as the truth slides deep inside you...
 
Ennui... Mr Savage has yet to migrate into The Nexus... A path that is inevitable to him.... Regardless of bets or idolizing ones intellect, there is simply no escaping the super ordinate proposition towards the finality of that which radiates... There is only acceptance as the truth slides deep inside you...

I have no idea what to think about any of this.

good-news-everyone-i-just-downloaded-the-dd-book-of-erotic-fantasy.jpg


And I will play a half-elf.
 
“I am at heart a propagandist, a tremendous hater, a tiresome nag, complacently positive that there is no human problem that could not be solved if people would simply do as I advise.” -Gore Vidal

Vidal said of Britain: “This isn’t a country, it’s an American aircraft carrier.”

lol
 
I have no idea what to think about any of this.

good-news-everyone-i-just-downloaded-the-dd-book-of-erotic-fantasy.jpg


And I will play a half-elf.

Mr Hero, there is an idea of your own archaic being that resonates with a truth that you have yet to realize. This is the shards of The Nexus that will oscillate with your existence. It is all and nothing, tethered with you and everything... The actualization will migrate as time progresses.... This is the path where transgressions of your purpose wash away as the inevitable slowly slides eloquently deep inside your moist and tight body...
 
Mr Hero, there is an idea of your own archaic being that resonates with a truth that you have yet to realize. This is the shards of The Nexus that will oscillate with your existence. It is all and nothing, tethered with you and everything... The actualization will migrate as time progresses.... This is the path where transgressions of your purpose wash away as the inevitable slowly slides eloquently deep inside your moist and tight body...

I have no intimidate objections to this.
 
I have no intimidate objections to this.

Of course not, because you know it to be true. The gaping will be kind to you Mr Hero... I will be here every step of the way for your ascension... I want you to be beautiful...
 
Of course not, because you know it to be true. The gaping will be kind to you Mr Hero... I will be here every step of the way for your ascension... I want you to be beautiful...

I would prefer if "The Gaping" were used as a proper noun.

A process of other worldly expansion that is beyond all knowing and yet is known, is without feeling, but felt in the deepest, is a nothing that fills one's everything in the perfect unity of two matching horizons.
 
So you can't explain how Hillary could have made that deal, and now your mind is squirming like a toad trying to conflate it with the McCabe thing<Lmaoo>

For the thousandth time:

"Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating proposed foreign acquisitions for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can.

All nine federal agencies were required to approve the Uranium One transaction before it could go forward. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton “never intervened” in committee matters. Clinton herself has said she wasn’t personally involved."

And since you have made it clear reading is not your thing, here is a PBS News segment about Trump and right wingers selling you bullshit:




As for Bills' speaking, as I said, check your tattoo and it will answer your question about Bill Clinton's speech: "Hillary didn't have to power to make that deal, and there is no evidence that any uranium ended up in Russia."

In a quid pro quo Bob, you need a payoff. Bill Clinton also made a speech in 2008 for $500,000 for Tony Robbins' Power Within brand, can your squirming toad brain conflate that into your conspiracy theories?

http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...hecking-clinton-cash-author-claim-about-bill/

th
th








So you can’t explain away why both Clintons met privately with Putin, as well as cashed a 500k Russian check, AND you’re pretending to believe the Clintons have no influence.



You’re down and the ref is counting.
 
So you can’t explain away why both Clintons met privately with Putin, as well as cashed a 500k Russian check, AND you’re pretending to believe the Clintons have no influence.



You’re down and the ref is counting.

So you got nothing a usual.
 
So you can’t explain away why both Clintons met privately with Putin, as well as cashed a 500k Russian check, AND you’re pretending to believe the Clintons have no influence.



You’re down and the ref is counting.

In all honesty Bob, I am getting sick of putting time and effort into my posts to support my positions with articles, and you just coming back with your half-assed attempts to save face, where you clearly have not read anything I presented, and you offering nothing to back up your positions.

So for the last time:

1) Explain to me how the influence happened, while taking into account the facts.

2) And you are the one who needs to explain why (using facts) "both Clintons met privately with Putin" to support your suggestion that something nefarious was going on.
 
In all honesty Bob, I am getting sick of putting time and effort into my posts to support my positions with articles, and you just coming back with your half-assed attempts to save face, where you clearly have not read anything I presented, and you offering nothing to back up your positions.

So for the last time:

1) Explain to me how the influence happened, while taking into account the facts.

2) And you are the one who needs to explain why (using facts) "both Clintons met privately with Putin" to support your suggestion that something nefarious was going on.



Sure, here’s what happens.


People wanted something done in Washington.

They know a powerful couple, the Clintons, who just happen have a sham charity set up.

They figure, why don’t we make a nice fat “donation” and the Clintons will essentially lobby in private on our behalf.

Clintons gladly accept, talk to a few people, and next thing you know. It’s approved.



Welcome to the Clintons 101.



See, it’s not some giant conspiracy. The Clintons are powerful people who like money. They’re more than willing to accept some of it to pretend to care about whatever you want them to.



As for both meeting with Putin individually, in private, in Russia. Really, I have no idea (though I have a few suspicions), because nobody will ever address it head on. All I can tell you is that the Clintons cashed a fat check, from a Russian bank, who is tied to Uranium one. Oh, and that you won’t touch the topic. Who can blame you, you’ve been crying about trump and russia for a year, you really look like a fool when it’s actually your candidate meeting privately with Putin and cashing checks...



Don’t expect me to shed a tear because you post of wall of text of mixed insults and weak arguments like “well Hillary wasn’t the only one to have to vote” while you know damn well the Clintons have weight they’ve been pushing around Washington for decades.


Even the corner is telling you to stay down, you’re embarrassing yourself pretending the Clintons are honorable people again.
 
Sure, here’s what happens.


People wanted something done in Washington.

They know a powerful couple, the Clintons, who just happen have a sham charity set up.

They figure, why don’t we make a nice fat “donation” and the Clintons will essentially lobby in private on our behalf.

Clintons gladly accept, talk to a few people, and next thing you know. It’s approved.



Welcome to the Clintons 101.



See, it’s not some giant conspiracy. The Clintons are powerful people who like money. They’re more than willing to accept some of it to pretend to care about whatever you want them to.



As for both meeting with Putin individually, in private, in Russia. Really, I have no idea (though I have a few suspicions), because nobody will ever address it head on. All I can tell you is that the Clintons cashed a fat check, from a Russian bank, who is tied to Uranium one. Oh, and that you won’t touch the topic. Who can blame you, you’ve been crying about trump and russia for a year, you really look like a fool when it’s actually your candidate meeting privately with Putin and cashing checks...



Don’t expect me to shed a tear because you post of wall of text of mixed insults and weak arguments like “well Hillary wasn’t the only one to have to vote” while you know damn well the Clintons have weight they’ve been pushing around Washington for decades.


Even the corner is telling you to stay down, you’re embarrassing yourself pretending the Clintons are honorable people again.

So no evidence, and no attempt to address the fact that "Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson?" She just has to "talk to a few people, and next thing you know. It’s approved." :rolleyes:

If you don't see how dumb you sound about this Bob, then you truly are a lost cause.

And exactly, you "have no idea" about anything the Clintons did that was nefarious with Russia and Putin, and you have no evidence to support that there was anything nefarious any more than you do that Bill Clinton and Tony Robbins were colluding on something nefarious. So you have no evidence, you don't even have a complete thought let alone a complete argument about this point, so what do you want from me? The burden of proof is on you to complete your thought, make an argument, and then provide facts to support your argument. You are like debating a middling middle school kid.

th
 
Last edited:
Anyone else pumped to see this Style Bender cat fight again?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top