The victim in Conors rape case being investigated was brutalized, Conor later said it was consensual

Status
Not open for further replies.
Isn't the allegation that Conor McGregor was beating her and doing other unsavory things and you're asking why she didn't just get away or scratch him? As if it were just that easy to avoid these kinds of situations.

I mean, realistically speaking there's a lot less incentive for her to lie than for him.
First of all these are allegations. Second yes, if he was “beating” her why didn’t she defend herself by scratching him? Simple question. Why didn’t she run to the bathroom? Was she chained up? Why didn’t she scream? Or call the cops or defend herself like Christy Mac?

Thanks for your contribution
 
You know there was a huge rape trial here in Ireland not too long ago involving some guys from the national rugby team... some girl got involved in group sex with 2 or 3 of them and said she was raped.
Luckily there was a witness... a woman opened the bedroom door and walked in and what she saw she said seemed consensual - otherwise they'd have been fucked. Despite being found innocent they lost their jobs, had to go abroad, dropped permanently by Ireland..and there were marches in the street against the verdict.

There is a myth that men are out raping and the 'patriarchy' etc means they get away with it. The way public opinion is the woman is almost always believed by 90% + of the public.
 
That's about the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard.


You honestly sound like you may be a rapist.
LOL ok. Whatever you say bud.

You're clearly naive and unintelligent. You don't realize how difficult rape cases are to prove.

A friend of mine in university was actually raped when she was drunk. She was passed out and some dude offered to get her home in a cab, and then she woke up to him having sex with her. She confided in her group of friends (of which I was one), and we encouraged her to go to the police. At the end of the day it was her word vs his, despite all the witnesses claiming she was way too drunk to consent.

The police literally told her "look, we get hundreds of rape accusations a year, and most of them are just girls that regret having sex when drunk, despite consenting." It was impossible for them to pursue her case because of the likelihood that this wasn't a real rape accusation.

Let me break it down further, because you're probably confused: By making false rape accusations, you make it more difficult to prosecute actual rape cases for real victims. This alone should be 10-20 years in prison.
 
Don't let Sherdog turn into shitty facebook comments.

We don't know shit and let's hope they both find peace and the truth prevails.
 
Maybe she hit herself. Maybe a guy friend did it. Maybe they were planning this the entire time.

Conor being a celebrity makes it even more delicate
I see what you are saying. Possible. But she drove her tampon so far into her that it had to be surgically removed? People wanting money are usually pretty lazy, dumb, and un willing to go to any extent where they would harm themselves.
 
Not really. You need to prove 1) Conor did the deed 2) That the deed was non-consensual

From DNA evidence it seems clear he had sex with her, but everything else is up for discussion. You can argue likelihoods ll you want, but it wouldn't be the first time a woman faked being attacked for personal gain
It wouldn't be the first time a man in a position of power abused that power to do whatever he wanted (and this happens far more often than someone lying about it).
 
Check my post history. I was all over Conor for his shit and still am. But its a long way between trying to pick a fight with someone and raping a woman

Its not about picking a fight though. He put alot of people in danger when threw that trolly at the bus. He didnt care who was there and what kind of injury they sustained as long as he did what he wanted. A rational person wouldnt do that shit. I dont know if he did or didnt but I wouldnt be shocked either way.
 
youre such a fucking liar dude lol. Only about 5% of rape allegations were deemed false by the FBI from 2006 to 2010. Not sure where youre getting your info from but none of the things you post are factual. Nice try.
Nice try kid, but you're wrong.

Did you read the methodology? They don't include any rape allegations made to police which they are unable to prove and bring charges.
 
i can just imagine coked up conor "the double champ does whatever the fook he wants" in the middle of all this.
 
LOL ok. Whatever you say bud.

You're clearly naive and unintelligent. You don't realize how difficult rape cases are to prove.

A friend of mine in university was actually raped when she was drunk. She was passed out and some dude offered to get her home in a cab, and then she woke up to him having sex with her. She confided in her group of friends (of which I was one), and we encouraged her to go to the police. At the end of the day it was her word vs his, despite all the witnesses claiming she was way too drunk to consent.

The police literally told her "look, we get hundreds of rape accusations a year, and most of them are just girls that regret having sex when drunk, despite consenting." It was impossible for them to pursue her case because of the likelihood that this wasn't a real rape accusation.

Let me break it down further, because you're probably confused: By making false rape accusations, you make it more difficult to prosecute actual rape cases for real victims. This alone should be 10-20 years in prison.
Is the bitch doing time?
 
Not really. You need to prove 1) Conor did the deed 2) That the deed was non-consensual

From DNA evidence it seems clear he had sex with her, but everything else is up for discussion. You can argue likelihoods ll you want, but it wouldn't be the first time a woman faked being attacked for personal gain


This is wrong actually. The placement and extent of the bruising and such could easily prove she did not do it to herself....... If she has Conor fist sized bruising on her back for instance.....

Point is you are wrong to say we will never know. We may well be able to discern the truth.
 
Fuck off white belt.

For real. If you don't know that the vast majority of rape allegations are false, then you're seriously an ugly nerd that lives in his mom's basement.

Sadly, the literature attempts to paint a different picture. Due to false rape accusations being a politically unpopular topic, the unscrupulous researchers in the social sciences (who are known to be crazy biased) claim that false rape accusations are in the minority. However, if you look at the fine print in their research articles, they only count those cases where charges are actually filed.

In reality, what SHOULD count are all rape accusations reported to the police, whether or not an arrest is even ever made. THAT is what I"m talking about. And when it comes to raw rape reports to police, even without an arrest, the number of false rape accusations outnumber real rape accusations.

I'll let you in on a little secret.

High maintenance celebrities like Conor that live that "lifestyle" face these type of allegations almost on a monthly basis, if not 4-8 accusations per year, at the very least.

Only the allegations that have some type of merit to it will see the light of day. If the source reporting on it is the dailymail or the independent, it's likely a wash. But when reputable sources like the New York Times breaks the story, it's an instant must-investigate and merits the benefit of the doubt for both parties, barring any evidence. And so far, it's not looking good for Conor at all.
 
If guilty he will be worse off than when he grew up in Crumlin. This qualifies him for the GOAT of fools discussion. He better ask Kavanagh to teach him butt rape defense. At least he's better at stuffing take downs, but jeez we have seen Khabib take his back.
 
So you agree with me that it's 50/50
No, I don't.

I still think Conor should have his due process, but the overwhelming majority of the time that something like this is accused it's true. Likely a lot more often than it even is actually proven true.

Again, people don't even think when they say stuff like 'women make this shit up all the time'. There is a lot more at stake than just being called a liar; especially in a case against someone with a lot of money. Your entire life will be put on trial, every text, every picture, every sexual partner, your actions, your family's actions, etc. It's an absolutely terrible process to go through (which is why a lot of rape or situations like these go unreported, since it's also historically been difficult to prove and get justice).

Some people need to give their heads a shake. Does this mean that Conor is guilty? Not necessarily, but some of the comments in this thread just goes to show that we've got a long way to go.
 
Nice try kid, but you're wrong.

Did you read the methodology? They don't include any rape allegations made to police which they are unable to prove and bring charges.

Just cause they arent able to prove it doesnt mean it is false. It just means they dont have enough evidence. We have seen this with killers like OJ, are you really this dim? get real dude. Let me guess you really believe OJ is innocent right? LOL. Also many females dont report rape cause they fear the repercussions from society if they do.
 
No, I don't.

I still think Conor should have his due process, but the overwhelming majority of the time that something like this is accused it's true. Likely a lot more often than it even is actually proven true.

Again, people don't even think when they say stuff like 'women make this shit up all the time'. There is a lot more at stake than just being called a liar; especially in a case against someone with a lot of money. Your entire life will be put on trial, every text, every picture, every sexual partner, your actions, your family's actions, etc. It's an absolutely terrible process to go through (which is why a lot of rape or situations like these go unreported, since it's also historically been difficult to prove and get justice).

Some people need to give their heads a shake. Does this mean that Conor is guilty? Not necessarily, but some of the comments in this thread just goes to show that we've got a long way to go.

Well thankfully we don't convict people based on general probability
 
So for some reason she went into his hotel with him bc she thought they would play XBox? Didn’t she have a cellphone? Couldn’t she scream for help? Scratch him? Use the hotel phone? Lock herself in the bathroom?

Feels exactly like the Kobe Bryant case

I mean, assuming she actively decided not to do any of those things. Does that make it consensual?
 
I mean, realistically speaking there's a lot less incentive for her to lie than for him.

A lot less incentive? It’s called a civil case. She can potentially get millions.

Google the Duke Lacrosse Team rape case

Also check this out
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,179
Messages
57,972,703
Members
175,887
Latest member
kaneoconnor98
Back
Top