- Joined
- Aug 8, 2010
- Messages
- 581
- Reaction score
- 0
This illustrates the difference between a "diet" that's less-bad than the typical fast-food diet and a diet for an athlete.
If your goal is to be less than than the almost 40% of Americans who are obese, and maybe on the less-fat side of the 70% who are overweight, than this diet is for you.
If you want to, you know, be an athlete, healthy and in shape, that's another story.
If your goal is to be less than than the almost 40% of Americans who are obese, and maybe on the less-fat side of the 70% who are overweight, than this diet is for you.
Is it a fat joke that this adds up to 110%?
I've trained with athletes from Muhammed Lawal to Jake Deitchler and tons of athletes don't really shy away from fast food on non work days.
This article pretty much gives you the same info that you can get from reading one of these...
Unfortunately there are a lot of people out there who don't even know what this thing is.
but tasty!
Well, that's also the deference between just training/dieting for sport, and doing it for health. I don't know how often you're talking about, if it's a twice a year, or twice a week thing. But I assume you've noticed that there are plenty of elite athletes who get pretty soft shortly after quieting the sport.
I'd wager that anyone who makes fast-food a regular dietary staple won't be looking, or feeling, that great in the long-term. But I always frame my approach (and limited advice giving) in terms of both the activity (or aesthetic) benefits, as well the long term health implications (or lack thereof).
This article pretty much gives you the same info that you can get from reading one of these...
Unfortunately there are a lot of people out there who don't even know what this thing is.