I don't think anyone is disturbed by the idea of it working. I just think unless they see it with there own eyes they are not going to get on board.
Sharing a MMA fight if someone you claim is from a WC school beating someone who looks like they have never trained (while looking terrible doing it), didnt help your case in the way you feel it did.
The same as sharing those sparring videos, they look terrible. They make WC look really bad. We are yet to see any real evidence that WC could be a good base for MMA. Just because you say it will, doesn't hold much in terms of merit, without anything to back it up (visually) that makes you think wow!
Wow moments in MMA of obscure arts have happened loads... Machida did it for karate, mvp and Raymond Daniels done it for points fighting. Wonderboy done it for shiney pants kickboxing. Royce gracie did it for BJJ. Khabib and fedor done it for sambo... Etc etc
Fighting is not a secret, it's a sweet science
Ultimately, Wing Chun is a way of training skills, attributes and strategy. It should be as varied as boxing.
Throw any type of punch - hook, uppercut, cross, overhand, do parries, move the head etc- people call it all 'boxing'.
For WC they want a cardboard representation of chain punching or they say 'its not wing chun'.
This is complete rubbish.
My view is, WC will actually look outwardly not that different to boxing or MT in MMA, especially since alot of the more recognizable 'kungfu' WC techniques like finger strikes or chops aren't even allowed. There will be some outward differences but not as much as people think in how it looks.
However, even though it outwardly looks similar in mma, the inner mechanics are totally different than boxing. The way the limbs are used and the way sensitivity of chi sau is trained and power is generated for strikes are different.
But understand that in MMA you will see WC fighters doing straights, hooks, uppercuts, clinch work, elbows etc as you see in MT and dirty boxing- but it is still all WC.
Again I emphasize,
WC is a principle based art -you can punch with fist vertical or horizontal, straight, uppercut or hook, any type of elbow strike or parry it is all still WC, it is about how you use your limbs and the skills and attributes WC develops not how it looks when it is used.
Explantion of the differences despite outwardly looking similar.
Wing Chun is supposed to be a dynamic system.
Alan Orr is one of the few guys out there who gets it,and the fact he does MMA is no surprise.
He describes that way WC has a variety of punches, not just the straight blast for example. Yet mostly you see WC guys standing linear and throwing mainly straights which they don't need to.
So he is using WC correctly, which is why is doesn't 'look' like the limited stereotype version of the art people are used to seeing since that is not what it's supposed to look like anyway.
A highly respected Wing Chun grandmaster who I wont name has told me that 95% or more of the Wing Chun out there is garbage. And it true. People just don't understand the style.
I think I will have to train up a guy eventually to do this.
Will probably start with BKFC since to do MMA needs too many other skill sets and WC may not even get a chance to shine in that environment unless it is good wrestler who can keep it standing.
WC also has the BK lineage I believe so training a fighter for that title would be nice.