The Road to Wing Chun applied in Combat Sports

Outside of Alan, these guys in MMA who are using WC techniques are basically youtubing random shit, trying it out for curiosity and being creative. I guess it's a "superior" system if someone just needs a 4min video to master it instead of hours and years of bag/pads/drilling it
 
Last edited:
Am I missing something? When you sign a waiver before you kickboxing or MMA fight, you are basicly taking responsibility away from the organisation if you were to die. So you are literally signing up for giving and receiving deadly blows to end the fight as quick as possible.

Because there are rules, doesn't mean its light contact sparring. I really don't understand people who think 1 - that they have secret techniques, or 2 - they would have the timing and skill to land them in a real fight (I'd imagine the strike would have to be extremely precise?)

The human body is very resilient, and all of this too dangerous to use crap is a load of nonesense. The only thing that can guarantee to end a fight quickly are nut shots and eye pokes.

What are all these too dangerous for the cage techniques that you keep talking about you are hoping you never have to use in real life? @TheMaster

That's a good point.

One of the coaches in heres mma fighters fractured his tibia first round I believe it was, finished and won the fight.

Compare that to WC and other fantasy martial arts where guys become incapacitated by a single shot. Parry, judo chop, fights over.

Fail


These guys think it's like the movies, guy fights multiple attackers, hits attackers once, they instantly go down and don't get back up. Just like in the movies. Incapacitating slap to the stomach!
 
Simply put Chinese martial arts while still having some useful applications took a long time to actually evolve compared to how say Japanese martial arts evolved, whether that was due to the outlaw of martial arts during the Communist regime, the media mainly concentrating on the striking side while ignoring the wrestling or grappling systems like Shuai Jiao and Chin-Na or just grandmasters being too stubborn to acknowledge their styles might be outdated, either way it took a long time for the CMA scene to see any evolution. Also the fact there's evidence like illustrations of leitai bouts where the competitors not using any of that fancy Kung Fu movements like you see on film.

Then there's the fact that older styles like Wrestling are still effective which makes CMA look even worse despite submission techniques being removed from the wrestling curriculum by many institutions for a long time due to "safety reasons". I was going to add Muay Thai but I heard that too had some TMA aspects that has been downplayed when it became a combat sport but I can't confirm that because I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of Muay Thai so I could be wrong.
 
Simply put Chinese martial arts while still having some useful applications took a long time to actually evolve compared to how say Japanese martial arts evolved, whether that was due to the outlaw of martial arts during the Communist regime, the media mainly concentrating on the striking side while ignoring the wrestling or grappling systems like Shuai Jiao and Chin-Na or just grandmasters being too stubborn to acknowledge their styles might be outdated, either way it took a long time for the CMA scene to see any evolution. Also the fact there's evidence like illustrations of leitai bouts where the competitors not using any of that fancy Kung Fu movements like you see on film.

Then there's the fact that older styles like Wrestling are still effective which makes CMA look even worse despite submission techniques being removed from the wrestling curriculum by many institutions for a long time due to "safety reasons". I was going to add Muay Thai but I heard that too had some TMA aspects that has been downplayed when it became a combat sport but I can't confirm that because I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of Muay Thai so I could be wrong.

Your thinking of muay boran, which is pretty much muay thais version of fantasy flashy bullshit.....think Tony jaa, ong bak stuff. Muay boran came from krabi krabong and krabi krabong or at least what it is today is total movie flashy bullshit.

Sport muay thai is combat tested in the ring, which is why we see it for what it is and not muay boran.....there's bits and pieces of muay boran, that can work similar to WC in that regards, but fails as whole. Guys like saenchai are able to make some of it work.

Muay thai what it is today, is from seeing what works and what doesn't which is why we don't see alligator whips its tail or what not.

The shit you see tony jaa doing ain't happening in real life.

It's a fantasy martial art
 
Your thinking of muay boran, which is pretty much muay thais version of fantasy flashy bullshit.....think Tony jaa, ong bak stuff. Muay boran came from krabi krabong and krabi krabong or at least what it is today is total movie flashy bullshit.

Sport muay thai is combat tested in the ring, which is why we see it for what it is and not muay boran.....there's bits and pieces of muay boran, that can work similar to WC in that regards, but fails as whole. Guys like saenchai are able to make some of it work.

Muay thai what it is today, is from seeing what works and what doesn't which is why we don't see alligator whips its tail or what not.

The shit you see tony jaa doing ain't happening in real life.

It's a fantasy martial art

Thanks for the explanation, I remember hearing about Muay Boran but I kind of forgot about it. I just realized MT was created around the 18th century, I didn't know that.
 
Thanks for the explanation, I remember hearing about Muay Boran but I kind of forgot about it. I just realized MT was created around the 18th century, I didn't know that.

Keep in mind, you have to be very careful when it comes to Muay Boran, as it isn't a TMA with the same meticulous lineage of something like Wing Chun or Crane. Muay Boran you see today is mostly nonsense, not in that it doesn't work, in that it's literally not muay boran. It's made up lineages and made up moves.

What we see in Muay Boran today is largely a modern performance martial art, pretending to be very old.
 
Keep in mind, you have to be very careful when it comes to Muay Boran, as it isn't a TMA with the same meticulous lineage of something like Wing Chun or Crane. Muay Boran you see today is mostly nonsense, not in that it doesn't work, in that it's literally not muay boran. It's made up lineages and made up moves.

What we see in Muay Boran today is largely a modern performance martial art, pretending to be very old.

Krabi krabong has gone the same way.

Both in ancient times were probably a lot different than what we see today.

Elbow the kick, kick that leg before it hits the ground, side kick the supporting leg without ever putting your foot down. I don't get how this stuff can appeal to anyone, minus those with some odd fantasy of what they would do in a fight.

 
Krabi krabong has gone the same way.

Both in ancient times were probably a lot different than what we see today.

Elbow the kick, kick that leg before it hits the ground, side kick the supporting leg without ever putting your foot down. I don't get how this stuff can appeal to anyone, minus those with some odd fantasy of what they would do in a fight.


IIRC Arjan Surat said that his teacher, who knew Boran in the early 1900s didn't know his own lineage from the 1800s, so if he doesn't know it, how would these guys claiming centuries old lineage
 
IIRC Arjan Surat said that his teacher, who knew Boran in the early 1900s didn't know his own lineage from the 1800s, so if he doesn't know it, how would these guys claiming centuries old lineage

My understanding was boran was basically swordless krabong. If you lost your swords on the battlefield, it's what you resorted too. Old style MT has a boran influence and if you look into pradal serey, or bokator, it's pretty much the same as what muay boran is to MT. Bokator is fantasy martial art imo
 
Outside of Alan, these guys in MMA who are using WC techniques are basically youtubing random shit, trying it out for curiosity and being creative. I guess it's a "superior" system if someone just needs a 4min video to master it instead of hours and years of bag/pads/drilling it
Not true at all.
Ferguson has been reported as spending sometimes hours on the wooden dummy in a single session by Eddie Bravo.
He has made it his thing and it has been a part of his longterm training regime for a while now.
And trying any method after just watching it without drilling it properly will likely get you your ass handed to you.

This is less 'wing chun works' as much as it is, hand traps and push kicks to the knee work. Tony's actual application of traps is quite a lot like muay thai, and push kicks to the knee are in savate, muay thai, jkd, wing chun, lots of martial arts.

It's not really an issue of techniques IMO, it's the art. If I tell you to paint something black, you could crush a bunch of charcoal and mix it with water to get your paint, or you could just use paint from the tube, they'll both work but one is going to be far more reliable

Well yes, it is about the fundamental principles at the end of the day.
But the same logic could apply to anything.
"It's not so much boxing that works but hook punches that work"
"It's not so much Muay Thai that works but leg kicks work".
Etc
All of the above styles have to be heavily adapted and changed for MMA or else people are taking elements of them to add to their game.
This is the nature of the sport and the principle of taking what is useful and discarding what is useless.
 
Well yes, it is about the fundamental principles at the end of the day.
But the same logic could apply to anything.
"It's not so much boxing that works but hook punches that work"
"It's not so much Muay Thai that works but leg kicks work".
Etc
All of the above styles have to be heavily adapted and changed for MMA or else people are taking elements of them to add to their game.
This is the nature of the sport and the principle of taking what is useful and discarding what is useless.

That's not really true though is it. I think you know there is a difference between your examples and what I've said. I don't feel like you're arguing in good faith
 
Not true at all.
Ferguson has been reported as spending sometimes hours on the wooden dummy in a single session by Eddie Bravo.
He has made it his thing and it has been a part of his longterm training regime for a while now.
And trying any method after just watching it without drilling it properly will likely get you your ass handed to you.



Well yes, it is about the fundamental principles at the end of the day.
But the same logic could apply to anything.
"It's not so much boxing that works but hook punches that work"
"It's not so much Muay Thai that works but leg kicks work".
Etc
All of the above styles have to be heavily adapted and changed for MMA or else people are taking elements of them to add to their game.
This is the nature of the sport and the principle of taking what is useful and discarding what is useless.

Punches work, kicks work,

Its swirling your hands around to a flashy 10 hit combo bullshit that doesn't work.
 
Lol @ you doing a physical strenuous movement such as running. More like avoid the whole thing and post memes while pissing off ppl on League of Legends <45>

I can move when I have to lmao
 
What we see in Muay Boran today is largely a modern performance martial art, pretending to be very old.

You just described near every "very old" martial art nowadays called TMA. If we do research ancient books near everything leads to them being trained like nowadays boxing, mt etc which kind of makes sense. Nowadays they are just shallow images of that time. We are more in sync with the mindset of these old MAs by doing so called sports ma.
 
Jkd and WC fall into the same category through my eyes. Most people that are big advocates of jkd are in lala land. Good bits and pieces but fails as a whole. It's been tested and exposed as BS rather than proven effective. Now before the jkd guys get their Bruce Lee pants in a bunch. I'll repeat I studied and trained jkd. I used to have Bruce Lee posters, dragons and yin yang stuff on my walls.

View attachment 805405

Jkd guys typically resort to the same old defenses. Too deadly for the ring and no grandmasters left.

Basically Wing Chun seems to have become the current symbol of the common idea that "only sport martial arts are valid".

I am advocating a balanced view.

This goes back to Kano removing very dangerous techniques from Judo to allow them to go at it full on.
Then when his Judo guys fought the traditional ju jitsu guys they usually (not always) whooped them even with the 'dangerous moves' allowed since they were used to live training.
We get it. Not a revelation.

You seem to forget that I started with Judo. I know what live training is. Any of the real fights I've been in (not many but a few) usually I would use grappling.
Grappling has always been one of the bases and I have seen fighting from that.
One of the revelations to me was when I grabbed my old WC instructor in close and he was still able to hit me, hard with the same arm I was holding at the wrist.

Close range combat is their thing. I realized that the integration of the two systems enables one to seriously hurt a grappler from even close range. Likewise it enables one to hit and hurt, then throw a striker if one wishes.

You want WC to be this cliche of flurries like the movies. Probably beacause Bruce Lee was your idol and you were a martial nerd then you discovered MT and your intro to "real fighting" but you went too far the other way.
It's interesting you lump JKD in there as bs.
It was early MMA before MMA in the US. Bruce criticized point karate and "dry land swimming".
Obviously they still want to preserve the writings and connection to Bruce which is part of the issue.

But it naturally lends itself to cross training but more for a real life situation which is probably why u dislike it since we know for you "sport 100% = real life"

Some legit guys who come from JKD are Matt Thornton - he is great.
And another guy who came from a strong JKD background and still does it - with all the Inosanto stick work as well is none other than Erik Paulson.



I never liked it when guys look down on trailblazers and arts that came before just because what we do now has evolved in some ways and surpasses it.
 
Last edited:
Basically Wing Chun seems to have become the current symbol of the common idea that "only sport martial arts are valid".

I am advocating a balanced view.

This goes back to Kano removing very dangerous techniques from Judo to allow them to go at it full on.
Then when his Judo guys fought the traditional ju jitsu guys they usually (not always) whooped them even with the 'dangerous moves' allowed since they were used to live training.
We get it. Not a revelation.

You seem to forget that I started with Judo. I know what live training is. Any of the real fights I've been in (not many but a few) usually I would use grappling.
Grappling has always been one of the bases and I have seen fighting from that.
One of the revelations to me was when I grabbed my old WC instructor in close and he was still able to hit me, hard with the same arm I was holding at the wrist.

Close range combat is their thing. I realized that the integration of the two systems enables one to seriously hurt a grappler from even close range. Likewise it enables one to hit and hurt, then throw a striker if one wishes.

You want WC to be this cliche of flurries like the movies. Probably beacause Bruce Lee was your idol and you were a martial nerd then you discovered MT and your intro to "real fighting" but you went too far the other way.
It's interesting you lump JKD in there as bs.
It was early MMA before MMA in the US. Bruce criticized point karate and "dry land swimming".
Obviously they still want to preserve the writings and connection to Bruce which is part of the issue.

But it naturally lends itself to cross training but more for a real life situation which is probably why u dislike it since we know for you "sport 100% = real life"

Some legit guys who come from JKD are Matt Thornton - he is great.
And another guy who came from a strong JKD background and still does it - with all the Inosanto stick work as well is none other than Erik Paulson.



I never liked it when guys look down on trailblazers and arts that came before just because what we do now has evolved in some ways and surpasses it.


Jkd was not mma. Bruce "concept" was mma. Back in the day people didn't really cross train, they were stuck in whatever they did out of some old school martial art tradition BS. Bruce was like hey screw that, I'll train a little this and a little that. His concept was to mix martial arts.....people have been doing that since then. It has evolved to what it is today, through trial and error and being tested and proven effective in the ring and cage. WC has not although its had just as much as a opportunity as any other art. Given bruce was a precursor to mma and an advocate of WC, you would think that advocacy would have influenced mma, it has not....bruce wasn't advocating MT, yet somehow MT has proven itself to be one of the most effective striking arts on the planet, which is why we see it so much in mma. So something the precursor to mma advocates is gone with the wind and something else dominates due to it being proven effective.

Now were again back to sport application vs real fight.....so your back to the elaborately rewording "too dangerous for the ring"

Your next null argument is sport vs real fight.....how is a boxing match not a real fight? It's not a fake fight. The goal is to KO your opponent. There's just certain rules. Only idiots like to think someone capable of fighting with rules can't fight without rules.

Effective infighting techniques fall under MT and dirty boxing. Like the videos you posted attempting to claim as WC.

WC hasn't proven itself and any attempt is usually reaching out very hard.

You like to make things up: such as the guy open to learning WC has an emotional bias towards it.....sure bud.

I'm expecting WC to be like flurries in the movies? No I'm expecting it to be like the previous video you posted. We just don't see it.

The only martial art nerd in lala land is you advocating WC. Which speaks volumes of yourself, and what you know about an actual "real fight"

What works in the ring works out of the ring.
What does not work outside of the ring, does not work in the ring.

There's things that work out of the ring that would work in the ring but aren't allowed for obvious reasons like eye pokes but shots hair pulling biting.....oh yeah and dim mak death touch lol.

So to summarize your arguments
1) too dangerous for ring
2) no grandmasters

To summarize mine
1) hasn't proven itself
2) your attempts at proving are "reaching"

I'm not going to change your mind. Which I wasn't aiming to do. I feel I have made my point. I'll use what works. You can use what works in theory against compliant opponents that stop fighting after a chop to the neck and a slap to the belly.

Chech out the hand traps to elbows regularly used in MT. Although I wouldn't be surprised if you fail to spot them. The only thing WC has going for it, is a very small percentage of it could carry over to MT. And a WC guy would probably have great sensitivity

 
Too dangerous for the ring and no grandmasters left

I'm sorry dude but someone like bas, kyokushin black belt, lifelong martial artist, fighter, competitor etc. I'm going to take his word over someone advocating nonsense

5:00
Yeah see but bas is only used to fighting in a sport type situation where you got rules! Shot holes in your sport vs "real fight " defense



You can't fake things anymore due to technology, what works works and what doesn't doesn't
 
Last edited:
Back
Top