- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,571
- Reaction score
- 68,912
^^^
This is your brain on CNN.
He specifically excluded those people from his statement referring to peaceful protesters.
-
Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here
THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)
- Thread starter Quipling
- Start date
- Status
^^^
This is your brain on CNN.
He specifically excluded those people from his statement referring to peaceful protesters.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,459
- Reaction score
- 768
To be honest with you, I don't understand MY OWN taxes, so there THAT is. <Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 67,330
- Reaction score
- 100,442
President Trumps dad was born in Germany you know...
At least according to President Trump...
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 26,142
- Reaction score
- 15,143
If you cared to understand, you'd realize the Mueller report tells us there was never a possibility of indictment, regardless of what they found. Charging a sitting president criminally is literally impossible.
Despite Barr's blatant lying about Mueller's intent, it was always meant for Congress adjudication. Which is now where it is.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,459
- Reaction score
- 768
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 26,142
- Reaction score
- 15,143
Literally none of his supporters will address this.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
Another one of those:
From the guy who is still insisting that the report clears Trump!
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 37,449
- Reaction score
- 38,700
I think the only Nazi’s left are old and in South AmericaPresident Trump failed that test when he said there were "Good People (Nazis)". These are people that want to murder me just because God made me with dark skin.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2015
- Messages
- 62,761
- Reaction score
- 31
Huh.
"The President's efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests."
So he failed to obstruct but he tried to. Only his lickspittles' refusal saved him.
"The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
I don't know how you guys are doing your happy dance over this.
"The President's efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests."
So he failed to obstruct but he tried to. Only his lickspittles' refusal saved him.
"The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
I don't know how you guys are doing your happy dance over this.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 25,248
- Reaction score
- 21,743
Greenwald is funny here. He was a being used by the GRU and he fell for it so easily
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,459
- Reaction score
- 768
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2013
- Messages
- 28,351
- Reaction score
- 15,841
Him venting about being pissed the investigation was still going
But of course that will be it
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2015
- Messages
- 62,761
- Reaction score
- 31
We don't know and probably never will. As with his lackey(s) -we don't know who- wouldn't follow his orders -we don't know what-.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,459
- Reaction score
- 768
House Judiciary Committee issues subpoena for 'complete and unredacted' Mueller report
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., issued a subpoena Friday to obtain the "complete and unredacted" version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia report, as well as the underlying materials -- the next step in what is almost certain to be a lengthy political and legal battle between Democrats and Republicans over the report.
"This includes, but is not limited to, all summaries, exhibits, indices, tables of contents or other tables or figures, appendices, supplements, addenda or any other attachments whether written or attached in a separate electronic format," the subpoena says.
Nadler's push comes a day after a redacted version of the report was made public. The White House has hailed the report, which found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in 2016, as a victory.
But Democrats have pointed to Mueller's review of 10 instances where Trump may be considered to have obstructed justice -- although the special counsel did not conclude that Trump committed a crime -- as well as other details in the report as justification for Congress to see the full report, and for Mueller to testify to Congress.
Nadler and other Democrats have been particularly opposed to Attorney General William Barr's decision to release a redacted version of the report to Congress. Barr said that he, along with special counsel, identified four areas of the report that needed redactions, including grand jury material, information the intelligence community believes would reveal intelligence sources and methods, any material that could interfere with ongoing prosecutions, and information that could implicate the privacy or reputational interests of “peripheral players.”
But Nadler has claimed that the committee needs to see the full report, as well as the underlying evidence, in order to determine any further action they may choose to take against the president or his associates.
"My Committee needs and is entitled to the full version of the report and the underlying evidence consistent with past practice," he said in a statement. "The redactions appear to be significant. We have so far seen none of the actual evidence that the Special Counsel developed to make this case. Even the redacted version of the report outlines serious instances of wrongdoing by President Trump and some of his closest associates. It now falls to Congress to determine the full scope of the alleged misconduct and to decide what steps we must take going forward."
Nadler is requesting the information on May 1, a day before Barr is set to appear before the House Judiciary Committee. If the Justice Department doesn't respond, Democrats could hold officials in contempt of Congress or fight it out in court. Nadler's committee also holds the power to launch impeachment proceedings, something that a number of House Democrats and 2020 presidential hopefuls have indicated they may support.
Republicans immediately pushed back on Nadler's demand. Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga., accused him of "rushing to subpoena material" and of disregarding "good faith transparency without even taking the department up on its offer to review material under the redactions."
"As a result, today's subpoena is wildly overbroad," he said. "It commands the department to provide Congress with millions of records that would be plainly against the law to share because the vast majority of these documents came as a result of nearly 2,800 subpoenas from a grand jury that is still ongoing."
Something tells me Nadler will not be getting his wish.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., issued a subpoena Friday to obtain the "complete and unredacted" version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia report, as well as the underlying materials -- the next step in what is almost certain to be a lengthy political and legal battle between Democrats and Republicans over the report.
"This includes, but is not limited to, all summaries, exhibits, indices, tables of contents or other tables or figures, appendices, supplements, addenda or any other attachments whether written or attached in a separate electronic format," the subpoena says.
Nadler's push comes a day after a redacted version of the report was made public. The White House has hailed the report, which found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in 2016, as a victory.
But Democrats have pointed to Mueller's review of 10 instances where Trump may be considered to have obstructed justice -- although the special counsel did not conclude that Trump committed a crime -- as well as other details in the report as justification for Congress to see the full report, and for Mueller to testify to Congress.
Nadler and other Democrats have been particularly opposed to Attorney General William Barr's decision to release a redacted version of the report to Congress. Barr said that he, along with special counsel, identified four areas of the report that needed redactions, including grand jury material, information the intelligence community believes would reveal intelligence sources and methods, any material that could interfere with ongoing prosecutions, and information that could implicate the privacy or reputational interests of “peripheral players.”
But Nadler has claimed that the committee needs to see the full report, as well as the underlying evidence, in order to determine any further action they may choose to take against the president or his associates.
"My Committee needs and is entitled to the full version of the report and the underlying evidence consistent with past practice," he said in a statement. "The redactions appear to be significant. We have so far seen none of the actual evidence that the Special Counsel developed to make this case. Even the redacted version of the report outlines serious instances of wrongdoing by President Trump and some of his closest associates. It now falls to Congress to determine the full scope of the alleged misconduct and to decide what steps we must take going forward."
Nadler is requesting the information on May 1, a day before Barr is set to appear before the House Judiciary Committee. If the Justice Department doesn't respond, Democrats could hold officials in contempt of Congress or fight it out in court. Nadler's committee also holds the power to launch impeachment proceedings, something that a number of House Democrats and 2020 presidential hopefuls have indicated they may support.
Republicans immediately pushed back on Nadler's demand. Ranking Member Doug Collins, R-Ga., accused him of "rushing to subpoena material" and of disregarding "good faith transparency without even taking the department up on its offer to review material under the redactions."
"As a result, today's subpoena is wildly overbroad," he said. "It commands the department to provide Congress with millions of records that would be plainly against the law to share because the vast majority of these documents came as a result of nearly 2,800 subpoenas from a grand jury that is still ongoing."
Something tells me Nadler will not be getting his wish.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,459
- Reaction score
- 768
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,571
- Reaction score
- 68,912
We do know what. He was contemplating firing Mueller. He was advised against it, and took the advice. The end.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 67,330
- Reaction score
- 100,442
This is your brain when you worship a President of the United States and are too afraid to put any actual skin in the game.
Keep on cheering from the sofa at the T.V. Sherbro...
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2015
- Messages
- 62,761
- Reaction score
- 31
They should just give him a dog and then take it away from him.Well THAT certainly clears things up. IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKER!!!
Un-pooch the motherfucker!!
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,459
- Reaction score
- 768
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,571
- Reaction score
- 68,912
- Status
Latest posts
-
-
Media Tom Aspinall responds to Dana refusing to give updates on his eye- Latest: Clark Rogers
-
