- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 45,236
- Reaction score
- 6,620
Tons of it, read up!1. No obstruction. Seems clear at this point.
Tons of it, read up!1. No obstruction. Seems clear at this point.
If only it were that easy. The media and the Dems are too invested in this to let it go any time soon.This is it! This is the thread that is going to conclude the Mueller thread series.
I'm comparing two scenarios where the plausibly innocent believe they are fu***** because the conclusion has already been pre-written, in their minds. You know exactly what I'm pointing out but it's easier to deflect than acknowledge I'm right.
Show me some evidence or additional substance that "I'm fu****" was tied to a specific wrongdoing and I'll be right alongside you. But we both know you don't have that, and therefore, I'm not willing to draw conclusions based on "benefit of the doubt", or lack thereof. Don't be surprised that when you're asked to substantiate and you can't, you get called out. That's fair in my book.
Does the final word come from the SC's office and report?How do you get that? Seems quite the opposite to me.
Also read this https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/donald-trump-mueller-report-end-of-my-presidency/index.html
Now who won't admit they were wrong?
"Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked," Trump said.
Trump became "angry and lambasted" Sessions for recusing himself from the Russia investigation, according to Hunt's notes.
"How could you let this happen, Jeff?" Trump asked his attorney general.
Does the final word come from the SC's office and report?
Does the final word come from the SC's office and report?
I'd thought that was his conclusion.
It happens
Tons of it, read up!
I meant that the Mueller report doesn't find any collusion. At least that's my understanding.Did you mean Collusion or OOJ?
You're right, it's not obstruction it's witnesss tampering
Source in report of witness tampering
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512
I have not read report or reviews of said report. I should get to the report tonight late
I meant that the Mueller report doesn't find any collusion. At least that's my understanding.
That's hilariously faint praise.This is a win for President Trump.
I meant that the Mueller report doesn't find any collusion. At least that's my understanding.
I should have referred to collusion and in fact was in error, referring to OOJ.That's mine understanding as well. You said they didn't find any obstruction though which is different. They went after him for Collusion and obstruction. I only cared about the collusion aspect the OOJ stuff never interested me. Looks like most of the talk on this will now shift towards the OOJ stuff so I probably wont be falling this much anymore.
Angry for what? Doing the right thing? The country should be angry Barr didn't do the same. Barr embarrassed himself and the Justice Department.Absolutely Trump should have been angry with Sessions. It was clear that there was nothing to the Russian collusion story years ago, but Sessions allowed a two year fishing expedition continue on a flimsy basis.
According to Mueller don jr was too stupid to know he was colluding. Hardly a glowing endorsement of innocence.Yeah, no collusion. However, obstruction seems pretty obvious, even if the chain of evidence doesn't add up enough for charges.
![]()