SDMF
Blue Belt
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2009
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
Then how the fuck do they transfer force upwards during a split-squat?
The posterior chain. The split squats do not stress your posterior chain strength like squats do. Do you think your posterior chain is turned off when you do them or something? However, your squat, deadlift, good mornings and basically all your "brute strength" movements would not receive a benefit from split squatting if your posterior chain was weak. So if you are trying to get strong -- the DL and SQ being the most accepted test of lower body strength -- why would you replace the back squat with the inferior split-squat?
More important for what? Back Squats? You don't seem to understand that different movements require strength in different muscles.
More important for just about everything you do related to lifting heavy things. You can call that "functional strength" if you want.
Don't tell me you can't think of better posterior chain exercises...
What, good mornings? Deadlifts? Nothing changes the fact that squats are one of the best movements for overall development. If you replace them with split-squats or lunges you aren't going to get as strong and big as you would with back squats.
You're right ... Split-squats are an isolation movement that only targets the quads ... :icon_neut
They are still a compound movement but considerably more isolated than squats... And it's not the point I was trying to make. Mike Boyle is not arguing that you should supplement your squatting with other movements like split squats. He is saying you should replace them. That's like replacing deadlifts with bent over rows. It's fucking stupid.