- Joined
- Feb 11, 2005
- Messages
- 27,212
- Reaction score
- 39,097
The best thing he did in the last 25 years was a voiceover for a cat video.I still don't understand how Rappaport managed to stay relevant beyond the 90s.
"BLINK MOTHERFUCKER!!!"
The best thing he did in the last 25 years was a voiceover for a cat video.I still don't understand how Rappaport managed to stay relevant beyond the 90s.
Has Jake ever fought someone his size?That's what the article said I read. Beats me if it's true, but doesn't surprise me. Woodley has 6 or 7 KO/TKO on his mma record. One of those was Carlos Condit knee injury. Woodley has a powerful right hand, but take away his wrestling and you don't have some incredible striker. Woodley has always been a wresler. Jake Paul still hasn't faced a pro boxer with real talent. Matter of fact Jake has never faced a pro boxer ever. Jake hits hard and does have lil fundamentals in his boxing aresnal, but he is a long ways in terms of being a solid boxer.
Fair takes for anything subjective. Both were beasts behind the lens for sure but hard to argue Ridley's overall superiority. Tarantino's writing for True Romance is imo, what elevates the film. Tony did a fine job putting that insanity to film though.
lolIt's literally a quote from MSG. Use some critical thinking here man.
His team also admitted to falsifying their original weigh ins. So not even sure he was 216
Oh right, so what are your sources for the fight not selling well? And oh do tell, what was omitted from the article? Why did MSG not refute their statement saying the fight was selling well.lol
I'am using critical thinking that's why I think that article is bullshit, or omitting major parts of the truth
Wake up man. Yeah sure maybe there was a weight issue but no one wanted to see that fight. Fucking no one!
They tried to sell that fight and it wasn't selling so they scrapped it. They saw there "out" and they jumped on it
Even a blind man could see that
Use some critical thinking and look beyond that article. There's more to the story.
Your just not using enough critical thinking![]()
I don't think you know what A and B level actors are.
No, you don't. Rapaport has a successful career spanning decades, with hundreds of credits including dozens of movies. He is more successful than literally 99.9% of actors and is firmly entrenched in the C-list.Yes, I do. You are talking about a guy that was on the Howard Stern wrap up show, because he wasn't a big enough star to get on the main show. Howard has plenty of B level stars. He is a guy that does nothing but bit parts in small shows.
No, you don't. Rapaport has a successful career spanning decades, with hundreds of credits including dozens of movies. He is more successful than literally 99.9% of actors and is firmly entrenched in the C-list.
If you want to pretend that he isn't successful, that's entirely up to you.
Not my fault you know fuck all about pop culture.99% of actors don't get any parts. He gets bit parts. He is a guy that 99.9% of people don't know who he is. I only know who he is since he was always complaining on the wrap up show that Howard wouldn't let him on the main show. You know the one with Howard.
Not my fault you know fuck all about pop culture.
Apparently you don't even know what pop culture means. Gotcha.Pop culture? The guy is over 50. That isn't pop culture. Howard isn't pop culture either. I only know who he is because I'm not in my 20s. Anyone under 30 has never heard of him.
Apparently you don't even know what pop culture means. Gotcha.
You should look up what pop culture is.
And what a successful actor is.
Hey, if you want to pretend that Michael Rapaport is not a successful actor, that's entirely up to you.I just told you what it is. Are you 70 or something? You think a 50 year old is pop culture? You probably think Bonanza is pop culture too.