Reasonable opinion because it absolutely sucked. Often you see Emperor's New Clothes type praise on the shittiest shows/movies here.My wife and I watched it ages ago and both thought it was poor.
Reasonable opinion because it absolutely sucked. Often you see Emperor's New Clothes type praise on the shittiest shows/movies here.My wife and I watched it ages ago and both thought it was poor.
Agreed let's fight them!Reasonable opinion because it absolutely sucked. Often you see Emperor's New Clothes type praise on the shittiest shows/movies here.
I wouldn't say I disliked it(I own it on UHD), the production is very impressive but to me it felt like it would have been better off as a pulpier film, nothing wrong with a Viking revenge story but Eggers seemed to be trying to make something with a bit more substance which I didn't think it really had.Wow. We could not be more at odds over this. The Northman I enjoyed from start to finish, whereas the other was uninteresting and odd for no payoff.
Northman was excellent.If you mean the lead characters race he's shown as being Morgana's son and she's shown as a Romani sorceress, besides that it is obviously a fantasy and race is never mentioned.
Personally I thought this was much better than The Northman, Eggers obcession with just telling the legend as it was ends up with a bit of a bland film for me were as this does feel like more than a museum piece.
Bare in mind its a fairly obtuse atmospheric arthouse film though not some easy to consume blockbuster.
I agree Green Knight not great .......... but the Northman had a good first 30 min then it just became weird , boring, an gross . I actually really wanted to see it and even paid the 20 bucks on Prime to rent early - i don't think I finished it yet. Really dissapointedWow. We could not be more at odds over this. The Northman I enjoyed from start to finish, whereas the other was uninteresting and odd for no payoff.
Exactly!
I watched it alone in the cinema so maybe that effected it, but I didn't get bored, which may be because I'm a history nerd and the faithful production of everything I found particularly exciting. Maybe try again?I agree Green Knight not great .......... but the Northman had a good first 30 min then it just became weird , boring, an gross . I actually really wanted to see it and even paid the 20 bucks on Prime to rent early - i don't think I finished it yet. Really dissapointed
Northman is supposed to be historically accurate ? I think that was well before Ragnar right?I watched it alone in the cinema so maybe that effected it, but I didn't get bored, which may be because I'm a history nerd and the faithful production of everything I found particularly exciting. Maybe try again?
I basically enjoy the Northman for the reasons you mention here. It was an unusual mix of style and realism.I wouldn't say I disliked it(I own it on UHD), the production is very impressive but to me it felt like it would have been better off as a pulpier film, nothing wrong with a Viking revenge story but Eggers seemed to be trying to make something with a bit more substance which I didn't think it really had.
We get some stuff which highlights the lead character and his father obviously not being "good" but ultimately it is a revenge film were furthering the dynastic legacy of the Vikings in the catharsis. Again it felt like a museum piece to me, a telling of the original Amleth story without really having much to say itself were as even as far back as Shakespear was adapting it to tell contemporary drama/morally with Hamlet and many versions of that obviously updated to tell a story of their own time.
Thats why I think The Green Knight is much more successful, it takes a story from a similar kind of era but its a very contemporary telling off it. Not just by having a British Asian lead but the story is really his character is a much more modern look at being a hero, the catharsis is his realising that his grasping for(or being thrust towards) simplistic ideas of heroism/kingship without really having true morally and bravery will be a disaster.
Again though it is obviously a slow and quite obtuse film which askes a good deal of the viewer, I can see it not being for everyone.
A short while after Ragnar I think, a few decades. Northman culture, setting, props, language etc were all fantastic. From what I understand there's liberties taken with the plot and there's mystical stuff, but I've got no horse in the plot race and I like a bit of mysticism.Northman is supposed to be historically accurate ? I think that was well before Ragnar right?