The entertainment factor is at an all time low

The Legendary Scarface

Record since UFC 266 : 60-40
@Black
Joined
Apr 5, 2019
Messages
6,948
Reaction score
9,505
We have Belal, Merab, and also Valentina as fucking champions rn. We also have gotten to a point where fight night cards are literally becoming so trash that they're skippable. This is such a worse product then it was like a year ago. Idk what's going on. This is sickening. I'm disgusted and am ashamed in what this has become. Shit's dying fr.
 
The UFC needs to ban grappling/wrestling and become a striking only combat organisation

Casuals only find striking entertaining
 
UFC doesn't invest. They don't pay and bid for top talent that are free agents. They spam cards with random sub 155 fighters male and female. Just care about broadcasting rights. PPVs numbers don't even get published. Just broadcasting. So they don't put on the best fights anymore.
 
But cool fancy screens though.

Unfortunately wrestling is just too OP in the MMA ruleset. You can just lay in someone's guard doing jack shit and win the round. I wish it counted as a neutral position. Whoever is landing more strikes and attacking more submissions should win the round
 
Idk what's going on.

Thats what happens when UFC can't help fucking with things. The attitude of "lose a fight and you're a fucking bum" and working to push fighters down, along with shit pay if you aren't a gun trash talker = fighters are forced to play it safe.

UFC says tells them it's better to win a boring decision than lose an edge of your seat banger - of course the fighters take note.
 
But cool fancy screens though.

Unfortunately wrestling is just too OP in the MMA ruleset. You can just lay in someone's guard doing jack shit and win the round. I wish it counted as a neutral position. Whoever is landing more strikes and attacking more submissions should win the round
Gravity says top fighter is winning. You can win from bottom but gotta be really good. Tony Kevin. Condit vs McDonald / Ellenberger. It is rare. Cause gravity. Hence top person is winning. Also phisically more tiring being on bottom.
Top guy throwin a strike is stronger, cause... you guessed it, gravity. Punching upwards is weak.
 
Last edited:
The UFC needs to ban grappling/wrestling and become a striking only combat organisation

Casuals only find striking entertaining
Shitty out of context argument.
There's a difference between grapplers that want to win fights by finishing them. Grapplers that advance position, get subs, and look to inflict damage are not the same work horses who hold on to you and make you carry their weight for 85%+ of the fight. That isn't fighting. That's laying on someone for points.

Once you're able to make that distinction, then you won't write goofy comments like that.
 
Gravity says top fighter is winning. You can win from bottom but gotta be really good. Tony Kevin. Condit vs McDonald / Ellenberger. It is rare. Cause gravity. Hence fop person is winning. Also phisically more tiring being on bottom.

Tiring someone should not be scoring. Like causing someone to bite at your feints when striking doesn't score as effective striking, but it is tiring.
 
Tiring someone should not be scoring. Like causing someone to bite at your feints when striking doesn't score as effective striking, but it is tiring.
Biting on a faint =/= getting manhandled in wrestling and kneed to the tighs
 
Back
Top