No wonder you add nothing of value in your retarded posts. Keep white knighting AOC. You're definitely not wasting your life. <Lmaoo>
Specifically. Respond. To. Something. I. Actually. Said. OR. Shut. The. Fuck. UP.
Literally unable to form arguments. O i am laffin.L.O.L.
Not unable. Simply unwilling to engage in proper discourse with someone that said that he is not interested in debate. The only person unable to form logically valid arguments is you considering your appeal to authority which has been pointed out as a logical fallacy. So I thought I'd dumb things down for you to make it easy for you to understand with pictures and all.
Did you guys ever stop to think that maybe if air travel was banned those people who died in Boeing’s new automated death tubes would still be alive?!
Fair enough on the first point.
I understand your reliance on appealing to things such as authority and numbers because you are unable to form your own critical analysis. Just to inform you, logical fallacies are not only for debating. It's for any argument made. All arguments are either logically valid or invalid. Whether you wish to continue your arguments in a debate is your option, but you formed a logically invalid argument to begin with. This was pointed out to you. You tried to confine logical fallacies to "debates only," and this is, once again, an error on your part.
This is such a fucking hilarious cop out, it's incredible. I am not an expert in climate science, you are not an expert in climate science. Were we having a debate about physics, I would defer to the data, opinions, and consensus of physicists. Were we having a debate about biology, I would defer to the opinions and consensus of biologists. I am not a biologist, you are not a biologist, you are not a physicist, I am not a physicist. This is not a matter of subjective opinion. This is a matter of hard scientific fact. If we were having a debate about the morality of homosexuality, or the morality of honor killings, there would be wiggle room for subjective opinion. We're not doing either of those things. This is a matter of measurable, observable, demonstrable scientific fact. There is no room here for your opinions, or my opinions. The matter at hand here is that you're too fucking stupid to grasp that, and I am not.
Nice, but I did not want your pic. Save that for whoever you are trying to woo.
Alright chump, keep LARPing as an expert climate scientist on the internet lmfao.
I'll take this as your admission of defeat. Good luck with your life.
There is no defeat because I am not debating with a faceless retard impersonating a climate scientist on the internet. Keep pretending you're a climate scientist bro
Says the guy who can't form a logically valid argument. Once again, just showing how you lost and keep losing...kind of like Hillary.There is no defeat because I am not debating with a faceless retard impersonating a climate scientist on the internet. Keep pretending you're a climate scientist bro
There is no "argument" because we are not debating a subjective opinion. Your inability to understand the difference between subjective and objective is why you're drowning in this conversation and showing all of us how few functioning brain cells you have left.
Arguments need not necessarily be about subjective opinions. But you're too dumb to understand stuff like that. I understand.
Arguments need not necessarily be about subjective opinions. But you're too dumb to understand stuff like that. I understand.
Oooh. Hillary is too right wing for you? How edgy! L.O.L.
You lost. Get over it.
