- Joined
- Jun 22, 2022
- Messages
- 18,594
- Reaction score
- 14,086
Pavlovich, Volkov ? Blaydes also beat Overeem.Tom Aspinall's best win.
Pavlovich, Volkov ? Blaydes also beat Overeem.Tom Aspinall's best win.
That post was made with @AndrewGolota48 's best brain cells.Pavlovich, Volkov ? Blaydes also beat Overeem.
Pavlovich, Volkov ? Blaydes also beat Overeem.
43 yr old retired fire fighter Stipe and Gane are better than those 3???Those wins are all about the same level I would say. Very good, solid wins. Jones in 2 fights already has a better HW resume though, pretty embarrassing.

Would definitely get less robberies.Score fights as a whole based on total cumulative damage is a hill I will die on.
lmao no he doesn't. His best win is Gane who lost to Volkov and would lose to Blaydes.Those wins are all about the same level I would say. Very good, solid wins. Jones in 2 fights already has a better HW resume though, pretty embarrassing.
lmao no he doesn't. His best win is Gane who lost to Volkov and would lose to Blaydes.
Problem is it's too subjective especially for 5 rounders. If I was the judge I'd just give Kuniev the 3rd round to create poetic justice.
So should we be more liberal with 10-8s and 10-10s? The status quo of almost every round being a 10-9 unless someone is nearly finished leaves you with a guy winning a dominant round 10-9 and potentially losing two toss up rounds that should have been 10-10 to lose a fight he clearly won.Unfortunetly Bladyes did win the fight.
Pride rules, hell no, the Russian dude would have won. But Blaydes wall and stalled his way to a 10-9 in rounds 1 and 3
Gane is 2-0 against Volkov and fought the last one with a triple foot fracture.lmao no he doesn't. His best win is Gane who lost to Volkov and would lose to Blaydes.
Nah, then the complaint would be "he had one good round then did nothing for the rest of the fight". In some instances it would literally be one good strike winning a fightWould definitely get less robberies.