2 points.
1. of course it would be better for muslim women to be in the west opposed to being in muslim countries. nobody is denying that. (muslims countries are shit because of muslim thinking, and musliom women are mistreated largely because of muslim thinking) nobody is making the argument that we should limit muslims immigration for the sake of muslim women. the argument is we should limit muslim immigration for the sake of the citizens already in the west. if living in muslims countries is unsafe for women because of the muslim thinking/practice, then bringing muslims in to the west only makes it more dangerous for the western women. don't believe me? ask marrisa shen, or the 1000's of teenage girls who were raped by the muslim rape circles in the UK.
2. if people were talking about only bringing in women from these countries, instead of single millitary aged men, people would give alot more support to accepting refugees. but that is not what is happening. the murderer got into the country because his brother was granted refugee status 4 years ago, then some church decided to sponsor him and his 2 brothers, one of their wives and their 3 kids. of the 5 refugees we know the gender of 4 of them are male. that doesn't seem like a very good ratio of men:women if we are concerned about helping muslim women from these dumpster countries, does it? so much for prioritizing women and children for refugee status.